Literature DB >> 29153519

Invited review: Practical feeding management recommendations to mitigate the risk of subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cattle.

E Humer1, R M Petri1, J R Aschenbach2, B J Bradford3, G B Penner4, M Tafaj5, K-H Südekum6, Q Zebeli7.   

Abstract

Rumen health is of vital importance in ensuring healthy and efficient dairy cattle production. Current feeding programs for cattle recommend concentrate-rich diets to meet the high nutritional needs of cows during lactation and enhance cost-efficiency. These diets, however, can impair rumen health. The term "subacute ruminal acidosis" (SARA) is often used as a synonym for poor rumen health. In this review, we first describe the physiological demands of cattle for dietary physically effective fiber. We also provide background information on the importance of enhancing salivary secretions and short-chain fatty acid absorption across the stratified squamous epithelium of the rumen; thus, preventing the disruption of the ruminal acid-base balance, a process that paves the way for acidification of the rumen. On-farm evaluation of dietary fiber adequacy is challenging for both nutritionists and veterinarians; therefore, this review provides practical recommendations on how to evaluate the physical effectiveness of the diet based on differences in particle size distribution, fiber content, and the type of concentrate fed, both when the latter is part of total mixed ration and when it is supplemented in partial mixed rations. Besides considering the absolute amount of physically effective fiber and starch types in the diet, we highlight the role of several feeding management factors that affect rumen health and should be considered to control and mitigate SARA. Most importantly, transitional feeding to ensure gradual adaptation of the ruminal epithelium and microbiota; monitoring and careful management of particle size distribution; controlling feed sorting, meal size, and meal frequency; and paying special attention to primiparous cows are some of the feeding management tools that can help in sustaining rumen health in high-producing dairy herds. Supplementation of feed additives including yeast products, phytogenic compounds, and buffers may help attenuate SARA, especially during stress periods when the risk of a deficiency of physically effective fiber in the diet is high, such as during early lactation. However, the usage of feed additives cannot fully compensate for suboptimal feeding management.
Copyright © 2018 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy cow; physically effective fiber; ruminal pH; subacute rumen acidosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29153519     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  17 in total

1.  Processing Index of Barley Grain and Dietary Undigested Neutral Detergent Fiber Concentration Affected Chewing Behavior, Ruminal pH and Total Tract Nutrient Digestibility of Heifers Fed a High Grain Diet.

Authors:  Tao Ran; Atef M Saleem; Karen A Beauchemin; Gregory B Penner; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Evaluation of active dried yeast in the diets of feedlot steers-I: Effects on feeding performance traits, the composition of growth, and carcass characteristics1.

Authors:  Whitney L Crossland; Jillian T Jobe; Flavio R B Ribeiro; Jason E Sawyer; Todd R Callaway; Luis O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effects of active dry yeast on ruminal pH characteristics and energy partitioning of finishing steers under thermoneutral or heat-stressed environment.

Authors:  Whitney Lynn Crossland; Aaron Bradley Norris; Luis Orlindo Tedeschi; Todd Ryan Callaway
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Evaluation of active dried yeast in the diets of feedlot steers. II. Effects on rumen pH and liver health of feedlot steers1.

Authors:  Whitney Lynn Crossland; Caitlyn M Cagle; Jason E Sawyer; Todd R Callaway; Luis Orlindo Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Processing index of barley grain and dietary undigested neutral detergent fiber concentration affected chewing behavior, ruminal pH, and total tract nutrient digestibility of heifers fed a high-grain diet.

Authors:  Tao Ran; Atef M Saleem; Karen A Beauchemin; Gregory B Penner; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Supplementation of a clay mineral-based product modulates plasma metabolomic profile and liver enzymes in cattle fed grain-rich diets.

Authors:  E Humer; I Kröger; V Neubauer; N Reisinger; Q Zebeli
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Chewing and Drinking Activity during Transition Period and Lactation in Dairy Cows Fed Partial Mixed Rations.

Authors:  Viktoria Brandstetter; Viktoria Neubauer; Elke Humer; Iris Kröger; Qendrim Zebeli
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Supplementation With Phytogenic Compounds Modulates Salivation and Salivary Physico-Chemical Composition in Cattle Fed a High-Concentrate Diet.

Authors:  Sara Ricci; Raul Rivera-Chacon; Renee M Petri; Arife Sener-Aydemir; Suchitra Sharma; Nicole Reisinger; Qendrim Zebeli; Ezequias Castillo-Lopez
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 9.  The Road to Infection: Host-Microbe Interactions Defining the Pathogenicity of Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus Complex Members.

Authors:  Christoph Jans; Annemarie Boleij
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Issues of Feeding Strategy for Lactating Cows in Vietnamese Smallholder Dairy Farms.

Authors:  Nguyen N Bang; Nguyen V Chanh; Nguyen X Trach; Duong N Khang; Ben J Hayes; John B Gaughan; Russell E Lyons; Nguyen T Hai; David M McNeill
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.