Literature DB >> 29153321

Consistency of Spatial Representations in Rat Entorhinal Cortex Predicts Performance in a Reorientation Task.

Shahaf Weiss1, Ghadeer Talhami2, Xenia Gofman-Regev2, Sophia Rapoport2, David Eilam3, Dori Derdikman4.   

Abstract

Goal-directed behavior can be affected by environmental geometry. A classic example is the rectangular arena reorientation task, where subjects commonly confuse opposite but geometrically identical corners [1]. Until recently, little was known about how environmental geometry shapes spatial representations in a neurobehavioral context [2] (although see [3]). In the present study, we asked: Under what circumstances does the internal cognitive map predict behavior? And when does it fail to do so? To this end, we developed a variant of the classical reorientation task that allows for investigation of temporal dynamics of reorientation. We recorded head-direction (HD) cells and grid cells in the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) of rats before, during, and after performing the task. MEC cells showed a bimodal response of being either aligned or rotated, relative to the free-foraging open-field sessions. Alignment was remarkably stable between disorientations and indicative of corner choice as a function of current and past alignment of spatial representations. Accordingly, when the cells showed consistent and properly aligned readout across multiple trials, behavioral choices were better predicted by HD and grid cell readout, with a probability of more than 70%. This was not the case when the cells did not show a stable consistent readout. Our findings indicate that entorhinal spatial representations predict corner choice, contingent on the stability and reliability of their readout. This work sets the stage for further studies on the link between the reliability of the neuronal signal and behavior, with implications for many brain systems in many organisms.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MEC; behavior; cognitive map; entorhinal; grid cells; head-direction cells; memory systems; reorientation; signal reliability; spatial disorientation; spatial perception

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29153321     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  9 in total

1.  Hippocampal Place Fields Maintain a Coherent and Flexible Map across Long Timescales.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Kinsky; David W Sullivan; William Mau; Michael E Hasselmo; Howard B Eichenbaum
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  The head direction cell network: attractor dynamics, integration within the navigation system, and three-dimensional properties.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Jean Laurens
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Is hippocampal remapping the physiological basis for context?

Authors:  John L Kubie; Eliott R J Levy; André A Fenton
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 4.  The Neurocognitive Basis of Spatial Reorientation.

Authors:  Joshua B Julian; Alexandra T Keinath; Steven A Marchette; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Environmental deformations dynamically shift human spatial memory.

Authors:  Alexandra T Keinath; Ohad Rechnitz; Vijay Balasubramanian; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Behavior-dependent directional tuning in the human visual-navigation network.

Authors:  Matthias Nau; Tobias Navarro Schröder; Markus Frey; Christian F Doeller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Mitochondrial Regulation of the Hippocampal Firing Rate Set Point and Seizure Susceptibility.

Authors:  Boaz Styr; Nir Gonen; Daniel Zarhin; Antonella Ruggiero; Refaela Atsmon; Neta Gazit; Gabriella Braun; Samuel Frere; Irena Vertkin; Ilana Shapira; Michal Harel; Leore R Heim; Maxim Katsenelson; Ohad Rechnitz; Saja Fadila; Dori Derdikman; Moran Rubinstein; Tamar Geiger; Eytan Ruppin; Inna Slutsky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Disrupted neural correlates of anesthesia and sleep reveal early circuit dysfunctions in Alzheimer models.

Authors:  Daniel Zarhin; Refaela Atsmon; Antonella Ruggiero; Halit Baeloha; Shiri Shoob; Oded Scharf; Leore R Heim; Nadav Buchbinder; Ortal Shinikamin; Ilana Shapira; Boaz Styr; Gabriella Braun; Michal Harel; Anton Sheinin; Nitzan Geva; Yaniv Sela; Takashi Saito; Takaomi Saido; Tamar Geiger; Yuval Nir; Yaniv Ziv; Inna Slutsky
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 9.  Goal-directed interaction of stimulus and task demand in the parahippocampal region.

Authors:  Su-Min Lee; Seung-Woo Jin; Seong-Beom Park; Eun-Hye Park; Choong-Hee Lee; Hyun-Woo Lee; Heung-Yeol Lim; Seung-Woo Yoo; Jae Rong Ahn; Jhoseph Shin; Sang Ah Lee; Inah Lee
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.899

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.