Literature DB >> 29152576

Meningococcal Antigen Typing System (MATS)-Based Neisseria meningitidis Serogroup B Coverage Prediction for the MenB-4C Vaccine in the United States.

Gowrisankar Rajam1, Maria Stella2, Ellie Kim1, Simon Paulos1, Giuseppe Boccadifuoco2, Laura Serino2, George Carlone1, Duccio Medini2.   

Abstract

Neisseria meningitidis is the most common cause of bacterial meningitis in children and young adults worldwide. A 4-component vaccine against N. meningitidis serogroup B (MenB) disease (MenB-4C [Bexsero]; GSK) combining factor H binding protein (fHBP), neisserial heparin binding protein (NHBA), neisserial adhesin A (NadA), and PorA-containing outer membrane vesicles was recently approved for use in the United States and other countries worldwide. Because the public health impact of MenB-4C in the United States is unclear, we used the meningococcal antigen typing system (MATS) to assess the strain coverage in a panel of strains representative of serogroup B (NmB) disease in the United States. MATS data correlate with killing in the human complement serum bactericidal assay (hSBA) and predict the susceptibility of NmB strains to killing in the hSBA, the accepted correlate of protection for MenB-4C vaccine. A panel of 442 NmB United States clinical isolates (collected in 2000 to 2008) whose data were down weighted with respect to the Oregon outbreak was selected from the Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs; CDC, Atlanta, GA) laboratory. MATS results examined to determine strain coverage were linked to multilocus sequence typing and antigen sequence data. MATS predicted that 91% (95% confidence interval [CI95], 72% to 96%) of the NmB strains causing disease in the United States would be covered by the MenB-4C vaccine, with the estimated coverage ranging from 88% to 97% by year with no detectable temporal trend. More than half of the covered strains could be targeted by two or more antigens. NHBA conferred coverage to 83% (CI95, 45% to 93%) of the strains, followed by factor H-binding protein (fHbp), which conferred coverage to 53% (CI95, 46% to 57%); PorA, which conferred coverage to 5.9%; and NadA, which conferred coverage to 2.5% (CI95, 1.1% to 5.2%). Two major clonal complexes (CC32 and CC41/44) had 99% strain coverage. The most frequent MATS phenotypes (39%) were fHbp and NHBA double positives. MATS predicts over 90% MenB-4C strain coverage in the United States, and the prediction is stable in time and consistent among bacterial genotypes. IMPORTANCE The meningococcal antigen typing system (MATS) is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based system that assesses the levels of expression and immune reactivity of the three recombinant MenB-4C antigens and, in conjunction with PorA variable 2 (VR2) sequencing, provides an estimate of the susceptibility of NmB isolates to killing by MenB-4C-induced antibodies. MATS assays or similar antigen phenotype analyses assume importance under conditions in which analyses of vaccine coverage predictions are not feasible with existing strategies, including large efficacy trials or functional antibody screening of an exhaustive strain panel. MATS screening of a panel of NmB U.S. isolates (n = 442) predicts high MenB-4C vaccine coverage in the United States.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MATS; MenB-4C; NHBA; NadA; Neisseria meningitidis; PorA; SBA; fHbp

Year:  2017        PMID: 29152576      PMCID: PMC5687916          DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00261-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  mSphere        ISSN: 2379-5042            Impact factor:   4.389


INTRODUCTION

Neisseria meningitidis, responsible for a global annual disease burden of ~50,000 deaths and as many long-term disabilities, is currently the most common cause of bacterial meningitis in children and young adults (1, 2). In the United States, serogroup B (NmB) strains cause approximately 30% of disease in all age groups, including adolescents, and >60% of cases in infants aged <1 year. Licensed conjugate vaccines have been successful in reducing the circulation and disease burden of serogroups A, C, W, and Y (3). However, serogroup B has presented unique challenges in vaccine development due to the similarity between the NmB capsular polysaccharide and a human neural cell adhesion molecule, which creates the risk of generating an autoimmune reaction (4, 5). The reverse vaccinology approach, starting from the genomic information determined for the bacterium, has enabled the identification of noncapsular protein surface antigens that could help prevent invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by any capsular serogroup (6, 7). These included neisserial adhesin A (NadA), neisserial heparin-binding antigen (NHBA), and factor H-binding protein (fHbp), which, in combination with New Zealand strain outer membrane vesicles (NZ OMV) harboring the PorA P1.4 antigen, constitute the N. meningitidis serogroup B 4-component (MenB-4C) vaccine (Bexsero; GSK). MenB-4C was the first broad-coverage MenB vaccine based on recombinant proteins (8) and is the only one approved (in January 2013) for use in individuals 2 months of age and above by the European Medicines Agency (8). In January 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved this vaccine for use in persons 10 to 25 years of age. Subsequently, the U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended the use of MenB vaccines for all persons >10 years of age in certain high-risk groups and suggested its use for adolescents 16 to 23 years of age (9, 10). Efficacy studies to demonstrate the benefit of meningococcal vaccines are not feasible due to the relatively low incidence of the disease. Efficacy of glycoconjugate vaccines against serogroups A, C, Y, and W was estimated using the serum bactericidal antibody assay with rabbit (rSBA) or human complement (hSBA) (11, 12) accepted as a surrogate of protection in the clinical evaluation of meningococcal vaccines (13, 14). Extrapolating this approach to NmB poses significant challenges. The meningococcal genome’s plasticity facilitates adaptation of surface structures to changing environments through a variety of genetic mechanisms (15–17) and generates a high variability of sequence and level of surface expression for protein antigens, affecting strain susceptibility to vaccine-induced antibodies. To predict the effectiveness of a MenB vaccine, a large panel of bacterial isolates representative of meningococcal disease in the United States would need to be tested in hSBA versus a significant number of subjects, thus requiring large volumes of serum and human complement. This would be a challenging undertaking, especially in infant populations. To overcome these limitations, the meningococcal antigen typing system (MATS) was developed and standardized across public health laboratories worldwide (18, 19). The MATS combines a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure the immunologic cross-reactivity and quantity of antigen expression for three MenB-4C protein antigens (fHbp, NadA, and NHBA) with genetic typing of the PorA variable 2 (VR2) region to determine the immune recognition potential for the OMV component. MATS typing for each antigen correlates with killing in the hSBA and predicts the susceptibility of NmB strains to killing in the hSBA, i.e., the strain coverage of the MenB-4C vaccine (18). MATS has been shown to be a conservative predictor of strain coverage by the MenB-4C vaccine in infants and adolescents (20). In addition, MATS coverage was shown to correlate with high rates of individual seroprotection (21). MATS has been used to predict MenB-4C strain coverage in multiple countries, including Canada and countries in Europe (22–25), using cross-sectional panels of strain isolated from meningococcal disease cases in the respective countries during one or two epidemiological years. So far, however, the MenB-4C strain coverage has not been estimated in the United States; neither has the longitudinal stability of such predictions been examined. In this study, we evaluated a longitudinal panel of 442 U.S. NmB disease isolates (collected in 2000 to 2008) that were selected by the Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs; CDC) laboratory that are representative of serogroup B meningococcal disease in the United States (26). MATS analysis was performed on each NmB isolate, and the results were correlated with antigen genotyping data to determine MenB-4C strain coverage in the United States and to analyze its longitudinal trends from 2000 to 2008.

RESULTS

PorA VR2 subtype 4, covered by the OMV component of the MenB-4C vaccine (18), was identified in 23 strains (5.3%), while PorA subtypes 16 and 14 (each approximately 20%) predominated in 2000 to 2008 (Fig. 1A).
FIG 1 

MenB-4C antigen frequency distribution in NmB U.S. isolates (n = 442). (A) Prevalence of PorA VR2 subtypes. Most of the NmB isolates belonged to the PorA 16 VR2 subtype (20.4%), followed by the PorA 14 VR2 subtype (19.9%). PorA VR2 subtype 4 is expressed in 5.9% of the isolates. (B) Frequency distribution of fHbp MATS relative potencies (RPs). Among the U.S. NmB isolates tested, 262/442 (59%) expressed fHbp above the MATS lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) (gray bars). (C) Frequency distribution of NHBA MATS relative potencies (RPs) among the U.S. NmB isolates (n = 442). A total of 440 of the NmB isolates tested expressed NHBA above the MATS LLOQ (gray bars). (D) Frequency distribution of NadA MATS relative potencies (RPs). Among the U.S. NmB isolates tested, only 132 of 442 (30%) expressed NadA above the MATS LLOQ (gray bars).

MenB-4C antigen frequency distribution in NmB U.S. isolates (n = 442). (A) Prevalence of PorA VR2 subtypes. Most of the NmB isolates belonged to the PorA 16 VR2 subtype (20.4%), followed by the PorA 14 VR2 subtype (19.9%). PorA VR2 subtype 4 is expressed in 5.9% of the isolates. (B) Frequency distribution of fHbp MATS relative potencies (RPs). Among the U.S. NmB isolates tested, 262/442 (59%) expressed fHbp above the MATS lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) (gray bars). (C) Frequency distribution of NHBA MATS relative potencies (RPs) among the U.S. NmB isolates (n = 442). A total of 440 of the NmB isolates tested expressed NHBA above the MATS LLOQ (gray bars). (D) Frequency distribution of NadA MATS relative potencies (RPs). Among the U.S. NmB isolates tested, only 132 of 442 (30%) expressed NadA above the MATS LLOQ (gray bars). Among the NmB U.S. isolates tested, the specific genotype of fHbp protein included in MenB-4C, variant 1 and peptide 1, was identified in 144 of 442 strains (33%). Among the fHbp variant 1 results, the most common peptides were peptides 1, 13, and 4 (33%, 7.2%, and 5.0%, respectively) (see Table 2). The most common factor H-binding protein variant 2 peptides were peptides 19, 24, and 16 (11%, 7.2%, and 5.0%, respectively); all other variant 2 and 3 peptides were identified in less than 5% of isolates (see Table 2). MATS detected quantifiable fHbp expression in 262/442 (59%) isolates (Fig. 1B). The NmB isolates with nonquantifiable MATS relative potencies (RP) for fHbp harbored fHbp variants 2 and 3, which were not included in the MenB-4C vaccine. NHBA expression was detected in 440 (95%) NmB isolates with a quantifiable MATS RP. NHBA peptides 5, 20, 10, 29, 3, and 21 were predominant in the U.S. NmB isolates (see Table 3). The specific genotype of NHBA included in the MenB-4C vaccine is peptide 2. This specific genotype was identified in only 42 of 442 (9.5%) isolates, but MATS demonstrated the immune reactivity of anti-NHBA antibodies with the majority (n = 440) of test isolates, irrespective of the NHBA genotype (Fig. 1C).
TABLE 2 

Distribution of most frequent factor H-binding protein variant and peptide identities in the panel of 442 NmB strains

VariantfHbppeptideIDaFrequency(n = 442)% of totalPredicted coverage(95% CI) by fHbpPredicted coverage(95% CI) by all antigens
11b1443399 (99–99)99 (99–99)
13255.724 (0–76)68 (52–92)
4225.0100 (91–100)100 (100–100)
14173.894 (47–100)100 (94–100)
11081.8100 (100–100)100 (100–100)
1261.4100 (17–100)100 (67–100)
Other IDs429.581 (57–86)100 (74–100)
Total for variant 12646089 (77–95)97 (89–99)
2194811094 (56–98)
24327.2091 (41–100)
16225.0082 (27–86)
21132.9092 (62–100)
25112.59.1 (0–9.1)55 (36–64)
33171.6086 (0–86)
3051.1080 (60–100)
7651.10100 (100–100)
2/3Other IDs357.9066 (43–83)
Total for variants 2 and 3178400.5 (0–0.5)83 (46–91)

ID, identification number in PubMLST Neisseria sequence typing database. fHbp, factor H-binding protein.

Subvariant included in MenB-4C multicomponent vaccine.

TABLE 3 

Distribution of the most frequent neisserial heparin-binding antigen peptides in the panel of 442 strains

NHBA peptide IDaFrequency (n = 442)% of totalPredicted coverage (95% CI) by NHBAPredicted coverage (95% CI) by all antigens
512729%87% (31%–100%)100% (98%–100%)
20439.7%98% (53%–100%)98% (63%–100%)
2b429.5%100% (93%–100%)100% (100%–100%)
10296.6%97% (55%–100%)97% (55%–100%)
29265.9%92% (31%–100%)96% (42%–100%)
3265.9%100% (88%–100%)100% (96%–100%)
21255.7%84% (40%–92%)88% (40%–96%)
1184.1%100% (100%–100%)100% (100%–100%)
Other (n = 47)10624%50% (21%–71%)69% (41%–84%)

ID, identification number in PubMLST Neisseria sequence typing database.

Peptide included in the MenB-4C multicomponent vaccine.

The nadA gene was harbored by 170/442 (39%) strains, and 78% of these isolates (132/170) expressed NadA with quantifiable MATS RP (Fig. 1D). Figure 2 summarizes the results of the MenB-4C strain coverage analysis performed. Results indicated that 91% (95% confidence interval [CI95], 72% to 96%) of the NmB U.S. isolates are predicted to be covered by the MenB-4C vaccine. While 5.7% (25/442) of the isolates had three antigens covered (RP > positive bacterial threshold [PBT] and/or PorA = P1.4), 42% (184/442) and 44% (194/442) had two antigens and one antigen covered, respectively (Fig. 2A). NHBA alone or in combination with another antigen(s) had RP values that were greater than the PBT values determined for 83% (CI95, 45% to 93%) of the NmB isolates followed by fHbp with 53% (CI95, 46% to 57%). The proportions of MATS-predicted coverage for PorA and NadA were 5.9% and 2.5% (CI95, 1.1% to 5.2%), respectively (Fig. 2B). In the case of NadA, the low contribution may have been due to the growth conditions in use for MATS testing, which repress nadA expression (27, 28). Having four antigens and two possible states (MATS positive or negative) each, 24=16 antigen combinations or MATS phenotypes can be observed. As shown in Fig. 2C, only 5 of the 16 phenotypes were observed with a frequency of >1%, accounting overall for 96% of the panel. The most frequent MATS phenotype was the double-positive phenotype for fHbp and NHBA antigens, followed by NHBA positive, negative for all antigens, fHbp positive, and triple positive for fHbp, NHBA, and PorA.
FIG 2 

MenB-4C vaccine strain coverage potential among the U.S. NmB isolates (n = 442). (A) Among the U.S. NmB isolates tested, 194/442 (44%) expressed one antigen (1Ags), 184/442 (42%) two antigens (2Ags), and 25/442 (5.7%) three antigens (3Ags) at levels over the PBT thresholds for the respective antigens. Overall, MATS estimates 91% coverage of the 4CMenB vaccine among U.S. NmB isolates. 0Ags, no antigens. (B) Contribution of individual antigens to 4CMenB coverage of the U.S. NmB isolates (n = 442). NHBA conferred maximum coverage potentials, with 83% of NHBA-positive strains exhibiting PBT values over the threshold, followed by fHbp (53%), PorA (5.9%), and NadA (2.5%). (C) Frequency of MATS phenotypes among the U.S. NmB isolates. The most frequent combination was represented by MATS double positives for fHbp and NHBA antigens (39%) followed by MATS single positives for NHBA antigen (36%). The MATS-negative phenotype accounted for 9%.

MenB-4C vaccine strain coverage potential among the U.S. NmB isolates (n = 442). (A) Among the U.S. NmB isolates tested, 194/442 (44%) expressed one antigen (1Ags), 184/442 (42%) two antigens (2Ags), and 25/442 (5.7%) three antigens (3Ags) at levels over the PBT thresholds for the respective antigens. Overall, MATS estimates 91% coverage of the 4CMenB vaccine among U.S. NmB isolates. 0Ags, no antigens. (B) Contribution of individual antigens to 4CMenB coverage of the U.S. NmB isolates (n = 442). NHBA conferred maximum coverage potentials, with 83% of NHBA-positive strains exhibiting PBT values over the threshold, followed by fHbp (53%), PorA (5.9%), and NadA (2.5%). (C) Frequency of MATS phenotypes among the U.S. NmB isolates. The most frequent combination was represented by MATS double positives for fHbp and NHBA antigens (39%) followed by MATS single positives for NHBA antigen (36%). The MATS-negative phenotype accounted for 9%. Data corresponding to predicted strain coverage by year of strain isolation in the United States from 2000 to 2008 are shown in Fig. 3 (see also Table S1 in the supplemental material). Point estimates of predicted strain coverage were similar across different years, and the 95% CIs largely overlapped. Lower levels of strain coverage were seen in the isolates collected in 2006 and 2008 (88%) and 2000 (89%); higher levels of strain coverage were seen in 2001 (97%) and 2004 (95%). A 2-sided chi-square test was used to test the differences across years in the predicted MATS coverage and in the upper and lower limit of the 95% CIs. No statistical significant difference across years was observed (P value = 0.567, P value = 0.457, and P value = 0.654, respectively). A linear regression model was used to test the strain coverage stability over time, and no statistically significant trend was observed either (P value = 0.222; Table S2), indicating high and consistently stable strain coverage in the United States over almost a decade.
FIG 3 

MATS coverage of NmB strains isolated in the United States during 2000 to 2008 by at least 1 antigen (95% CI) by year. Comparisons of point estimates of predicted strain coverage across groups did not identify any statistically significant difference (P = 0.567).

MATS coverage of NmB strains isolated in the United States in 2000 to 2008 by at least 1 antigen (95% CI) classified by year of strain isolation. Download TABLE S1, PDF file, 0.1 MB. Linear regression results for the analysis of temporal trends. Download TABLE S2, PDF file, 0.05 MB. MATS coverage of NmB strains isolated in the United States during 2000 to 2008 by at least 1 antigen (95% CI) by year. Comparisons of point estimates of predicted strain coverage across groups did not identify any statistically significant difference (P = 0.567). Data corresponding to the predicted strain coverage classified by clonal complex (CC) are shown in Table 1. Two major CCs accounting for more than half of the circulating strains (CC32 and CC41/44) had predicted strain coverage of 99% (CI95, 98% to 100% and 73% to 100%, respectively). The two other CCs with frequencies of >5%, CC162 and CC35, also had high levels of strain coverage (91% and 85%, respectively) but with broader confidence intervals (CI95, 53% to 100% and 29% to 92%, respectively), suggesting antigenic variability. Minor CCs had high strain coverage (between 50% and 89%), too.
TABLE 1 

Distribution of clonal complexes in the panel of 442 NmB strains

Clonal complexFrequency(n = 442)% of totalPredicted % coverage (95% CI)by all antigens
CC321623799 (98–100)
CC41/441232899 (73–100)
CC162439.791 (53–100)
CC35245.485 (29–92)
CC269194.368 (32–89)
CC6092.089 (67–100)
CC21361.450 (33–50)
Unassigneda255.764 (32–76)
Other (n = 14)317.068 (55–84)

Unassigned, the sequence type (ST) of strains in this collection has been identified, but the ST belongs to no clonal complex (CC).

Distribution of clonal complexes in the panel of 442 NmB strains Unassigned, the sequence type (ST) of strains in this collection has been identified, but the ST belongs to no clonal complex (CC). Tables 2 and 3 report predicted strain coverage by genotype of the fHbp and NHBA antigens, respectively. Within fHbp variant 1 (60% of the panel), fHbp covered >90% of all major peptides corresponding to identification numbers (IDs) in the PubMLST Neisseria sequence typing database with the exception of ID 13 (fHbp coverage, 24% [CI95, 0% to 76%]; 6% of the isolates) and 81% of the minor IDs, for an overall 89% coverage by fHbp. Within fHbp variants 2 and 3 (40% of the panel), fHbp provided almost no coverage, and yet each antigenic variant was significantly (50% to 100%) covered by other MenB-4C antigens, for an overall 83% coverage by non-fHbp MenB-4C antigens. Within the eight major NHBA peptide IDs (IDs 5, 20, 2, 10, 29, 3, 21, and 1, accounting for three-quarters of the circulating strains), NHBA provided consistently high (84% to 100%) coverage. Coverage by NHBA for minor peptide IDs was also high (69% [CI95, 41% to 84%]). Distribution of most frequent factor H-binding protein variant and peptide identities in the panel of 442 NmB strains ID, identification number in PubMLST Neisseria sequence typing database. fHbp, factor H-binding protein. Subvariant included in MenB-4C multicomponent vaccine. Distribution of the most frequent neisserial heparin-binding antigen peptides in the panel of 442 strains ID, identification number in PubMLST Neisseria sequence typing database. Peptide included in the MenB-4C multicomponent vaccine. Due to the low number of isolates with levels of NadA MATS relative potency above the positive bacterial threshold (PBT; see Materials and Methods), the relationship between strain coverage and antigen genotype was not investigated for this antigen.

DISCUSSION

Molecular epidemiology is a component of bacterial surveillance programs that is important for understanding the incidence and diversity of the Neisseria meningitidis isolates collected in the United States. In order to predict the possible vaccine coverage potential, it is critical to assess the expression of vaccine antigens in the representative N. meningitidis isolates. A major limitation of the molecular approach to determine the potential for strain coverage by a vaccine is that it has not been possible thus far to obtain information about the expression levels of the protein encoded in the bacteria from genetic data. Expression of the protein is necessary if the bacteria are to be targeted by protective antibodies directed against the antigen of interest. Studies to characterize the geographic and temporal distribution of the vaccine antigens among the members of the N. meningitidis population in the United States are important to understand the disease dynamics and strategies for deployment of MenB vaccines. Considering the importance of antigen diversity and level of expression in predicting MenB-4C vaccine coverage, MATS was used to assess the expression and cross-reactivity to vaccine-induced antibodies of MenB-4C antigens among the isolates selected in this study as representative of NmB meningococcal disease in the United States. MATS predicted MenB-4C vaccine coverage of over 90% of circulating NmB strains in the United States. For the first time globally, strain coverage was estimated for a significant period of time and was found to be consistent over a 9-year time period (2000 to 2008). Among the MenB-4C vaccine antigens, NHBA alone was shown to contribute to strain coverage in over 80% of the isolates in a consistent manner across antigen genotypes. In contrast, fHbp coverage potential (53%) was restricted to the variant 1 antigen genotypes, as the NmB isolates harboring fHbp variants 2 and 3 were MATS negative for this antigen. Nonetheless, 83% of the fHbp variant 2/3 strains were covered by other MenB-4C antigens, suggesting the importance of the multiple vaccine components. MATS represents a conservative predictor of strain coverage in relation to hSBA as it does not take into account synergy of combinations of antigens or the contribution of other components present in the outer membrane vesicles (20, 29). Also, MATS does not factor in the interactions between antigens present at levels below the PBT. This is particularly relevant for MenB-4C vaccine as it contains multiple components that may provide a greater synergistic effect even when the individual components are present at levels below the bactericidal threshold (30). Genetic diversity among the endemic NmB isolates is well documented (24). This diversity is also seen in virulence genes that are vaccine targets. Possible changes in the expression profiles of these genes in response to genotypic variations cannot be ruled out. A change in the virulence factor’s structure might impact its immune reactivity, jeopardizing the positive outcome of vaccination. Evidence for this can be drawn from the MATS data obtained in this study with reference to fHbp, whose immune reactivity was restricted by the variant class of this gene that corresponds to vaccine antigen. Only those strains expressing variant 1 and its subclasses had expressed immune susceptibility to the vaccine. In contrast, NHBA, despite the molecular variations in the gene that encode the target peptides, was found to show immune reactivity to antibodies induced by the major and minor peptide IDs. Microbes are under constant evolutionary pressure posed by several factors, including vaccines. Given the possibility of genotypic changes in a particular virulence gene in response to vaccine pressure, an ideal vaccine should have inherent fail-safe mechanisms. One such strategy is to create a multicomponent vaccine such as MenB-4C. The presence of multiple components in MenB-4C vaccine implies that coverage may be maintained for strains that express multiple antigens in the event of mutation or loss of expression of a single antigen. It was previously noted that the bactericidal activity is increased for strains expressing two or more of the vaccine antigens at levels higher than the positive bactericidal threshold (18). Although this study was limited to the evaluation of NmB strains circulating up to 2009, the stability of the strain coverage prediction over the 9-year period investigated suggests that no major differences should be expected in the ensuing years. Also, all genetic lineages significantly represented in the country were covered at levels of >85%, suggesting that temporal oscillations in the frequency of clonal complexes would not affect significantly the MenB-4C strain coverage. Postimplementation surveillance capable of monitoring both genetic (antigens or full-genome sequencing) and phenotypic (MATS) variations will be the key to quick adaptation of the public health strategy to the potential response of the pathogen to vaccination (31), especially when joined with dynamic modeling techniques that quantify in nearly real time the effectiveness of immunization campaigns (32). Also, adopting the same tools and standards for bacterial typing implementation worldwide, earlier epidemiological evidence from one country could help in preventive adjustments of the implementation strategy in other areas. In September 2015, the United Kingdom was the first country to introduce MenB-4C into the national infant immunization program, offering the vaccine to all infants born after 1 July 2015, with a 2-plus-1 schedule at 2, 4, and 12 months and with two small catch-up cohorts for infants born between 1 May and 30 June (3, 4, and 12 months and 4 and 12 months). A detailed multifaceted plan is in place for enhanced meningococcal disease surveillance in England that will provide invaluable data on the usefulness of MATS for monitoring vaccine impact, characterizing meningococci causing meningococcal disease in both vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts and the impact on meningococcal disease in infants. The reduced infant schedule implemented from September 2015 in the United Kingdom national immunization program provided the first evidence of effectiveness of 83% for a two-dose vaccine against all NmB disease, equivalent to a vaccine effectiveness of 94% against the most highly predicted NmB disease-preventable strains (33). This vaccine effectiveness measured in the field exceeds significantly the MATS coverage predictions for the United Kingdom (67% in 2014/2015, representing the last year prior to mass vaccination). Considering the higher (91%) MATS strain coverage predictions in the United States, the effectiveness of MenB-4C vaccination in the United States could be potentially superior to the UK results, particularly considering the burden of disease in the infant population for which a direct link was established between MATS strain coverage and pooled hSBA titers and individual seroprotection (21). Recently, the FDA approved the use of MenB-4C before licensure to control several outbreaks in U.S. universities (34). The FDA subsequently licensed MenB-4C for the age group of 10 to 25 years, and the ACIP recommended its use for all persons of age 10 and older in high-risk groups (9). No cases of meningococcal disease caused by N. meningitidis serogroup B have been reported among vaccinated students, although the numbers were too low to allow statistically powered determinations of efficacy (34). A recent immunogenicity study conducted among U.S. college students during a NmB outbreak indicated that 87% to 100% of vaccinated students showed immunoreactivity to reference NmB strains compared to modest (66.1%) reactivity to the NmB outbreak strain (35). This difference in the levels of immune reactivity among the MenB-4C seropositives reconfirms our incomplete understanding of strain susceptibility to vaccine-induced bactericidal activity and the tendency of hSBA to underestimate the vaccine efficacy (36). Additional data regarding the breadth and duration of protection provided by meningococcal B vaccine will be key in the decision-making process pertaining to vaccine dosage and schedule. This report has provided a detailed breakdown of molecular characterization and MATS results for U.S. invasive NmB strains, estimating a high level of strain coverage for the MenB-4C vaccine in the United States. Overall, the data provide a useful baseline for monitoring MenB-4C. However, due to anticipated changes in the distribution of clonal complexes and antigen genotypes over time, continuous detailed surveillance and monitoring of the antigen expression of circulating strains will be needed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strain selection and classification.

A representative panel of 442 U.S. NmB isolates collected by the Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs; CDC) in 2000 to 2008 were tested in MATS. Among these U.S. isolates, representation of fHbp 1.1 was weighted to account for higher rates of serogroup B and overall meningococcal disease occurring in Oregon. Multilocus sequence types, clonal complexes, and antigen genotypes for these isolates had previously been determined (26). The U.S. isolates (n = 442) tested in this study included the major clonal complexes of endemic U.S. NmB strains. Clonal complexes CC32 (37%), CC41/44 (28%), and CC162 (9.7%) accounted for the majority of the strains (Table 1).

Genotypic classification of antigens.

The classification of fHbp followed the scheme available on the PubMLST Neisseria sequence typing database (http://pubmlst.org/neisseria/), which separates peptide subvariants into three major variant classifications: variants 1, 2, and 3. Unique NHBA peptides and nadA variants were numbered as previously described (37, 38). PorA subtyping had been previously performed by PCR amplification and sequencing of the VR2 region of the gene (26). PorA variants had been assigned therein according to variable region 2 (VR2) sequences on the PubMLST Neisseria sequence typing database.

Meningococcal antigen typing system (MATS) ELISA.

The MATS ELISA methodology (18), reagents, reference strains, and recombinant antigens were supplied by Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Siena, Italy (now part of the GSK group of companies). Briefly, bacteria were cultured overnight on chocolate agar (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and were suspended in Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.4. Empigen BB detergent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was added to the bacterial suspension to reach a final dilution of 1:11, and this suspension was incubated at 45°C for 1 h for bacterial inactivation. Twofold serial dilutions of bacterial extract in MH broth with Empigen were carried out in ELISA plates (Costar, Corning, NY) that had been precoated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies against fHbp, NHBA, or NadA. The plates were incubated for 1 h at 37°C and then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)–0.05% Tween. The plates were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with biotinylated antigen-specific rabbit polyclonal antibody to detect the primary antibody-bound antigens. After being washed, the plates were developed with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) and o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (OPD; Sigma). The reaction was stopped with 4N H2SO4 and read at 492 nm. A reference strain for each antigen (H44/76 for fHbp, NGH38 for NHBA, and 5/99 for NadA) was also included in the respective microtiter plates. Results were analyzed with StatLIA software (Brendan Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). The relative potency (RP) for each unknown strain was calculated by comparing the fit of the five-parameter logistic regression curves to 2-fold serial dilutions of extracts from the reference strain and the unknown strain. The reference strain for each antigen was assigned an arbitrary value of 100.

Estimation of NmB strain coverage.

In a previous study, it was shown that the presence of at least one antigen with a relative potency (RP) value greater than the positive bactericidal threshold (PBT; 0.021 for fHbp, 0.294 for NHBA, and 0.009 for NadA) or the presence of PorA P1.4 correlated with bactericidal activity in the hSBA by pooled sera taken after immunization (18). Therefore, the MATS data could be used to predict strain coverage by the multicomponent MenB-4C vaccine. Strains that did not meet these criteria were deemed not covered. In this study, the predicted strain panel coverage was defined as the proportion of strains with a MATS relative potency value greater than the positive bactericidal threshold value for one or more antigens and/or with PorA P1.4. It should be noted that the PBT was set using pooled sera from infants and that strain coverage predictions do not account for variations in the individual seroresponses.

Statistical analysis.

As described in the MATS interlaboratory standardization study (19), empirical estimates of the 95% CIs for the positive bactericidal thresholds were derived with a log-normal approximation based on the overall ranges of assay reproducibility (0.014 to 0.031 for fHbp, 0.169 to 0.511 for NHBA, and 0.004 to 0.019 for NadA). These values were used to define the 95% CIs of the strain coverage data. No CI was calculated for coverage by the PorA antigen, as the typing was performed genotypically (VR2 = P1.4). All statistical evaluations were performed using R statistical software (http://www.r-project.org) version 2.13.1.
  38 in total

Review 1.  Reverse vaccinology.

Authors:  R Rappuoli
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.934

2.  A universal vaccine for serogroup B meningococcus.

Authors:  Marzia M Giuliani; Jeannette Adu-Bobie; Maurizio Comanducci; Beatrice Aricò; Silvana Savino; Laura Santini; Brunella Brunelli; Stefania Bambini; Alessia Biolchi; Barbara Capecchi; Elena Cartocci; Laura Ciucchi; Federica Di Marcello; Francesca Ferlicca; Barbara Galli; Enrico Luzzi; Vega Masignani; Davide Serruto; Daniele Veggi; Mario Contorni; Maurizio Morandi; Alessandro Bartalesi; Vanda Cinotti; Donatella Mannucci; Francesca Titta; Elisa Ovidi; Jo Anne Welsch; Dan Granoff; Rino Rappuoli; Mariagrazia Pizza
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Distribution and genetic variability of three vaccine components in a panel of strains representative of the diversity of serogroup B meningococcus.

Authors:  Stefania Bambini; Alessandro Muzzi; Per Olcen; Rino Rappuoli; Mariagrazia Pizza; Maurizio Comanducci
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Pooled-sera hSBA titres predict individual seroprotection in infants and toddlers vaccinated with 4CMenB.

Authors:  Sonia Budroni; Annett Kleinschmidt; Philip Boucher; Duccio Medini
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Bactericidal antibody against a representative epidemiological meningococcal serogroup B panel confirms that MATS underestimates 4CMenB vaccine strain coverage.

Authors:  Giacomo Frosi; Alessia Biolchi; Morena Lo Sapio; Fabio Rigat; Stefanie Gilchrist; Jay Lucidarme; Jamie Findlow; Ray Borrow; Mariagrazia Pizza; Marzia Monica Giuliani; Duccio Medini
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Meningococcal polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccines.

Authors:  Matthew D Snape; Andrew J Pollard
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 25.071

7.  Additive and synergistic bactericidal activity of antibodies directed against minor outer membrane proteins of Neisseria meningitidis.

Authors:  Vincent E Weynants; Christiane M Feron; Karine K Goraj; Martine P Bos; Philippe A Denoël; Vincent G Verlant; Jan Tommassen; Ian R A Peak; Ralph C Judd; Michael P Jennings; Jan T Poolman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Use of Serogroup B Meningococcal Vaccines in Adolescents and Young Adults: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2015.

Authors:  Jessica R MacNeil; Lorry Rubin; Temitope Folaranmi; Ismael R Ortega-Sanchez; Manisha Patel; Stacey W Martin
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  A novel phase variation mechanism in the meningococcus driven by a ligand-responsive repressor and differential spacing of distal promoter elements.

Authors:  Matteo M E Metruccio; Eva Pigozzi; Davide Roncarati; Francesco Berlanda Scorza; Nathalie Norais; Stuart A Hill; Vincenzo Scarlato; Isabel Delany
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  Human immunity to the meningococcus. I. The role of humoral antibodies.

Authors:  I Goldschneider; E C Gotschlich; M S Artenstein
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1969-06-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  13 in total

1.  Meningococcal Vaccination: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2020.

Authors:  Sarah A Mbaeyi; Catherine H Bozio; Jonathan Duffy; Lorry G Rubin; Susan Hariri; David S Stephens; Jessica R MacNeil
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2020-09-25

2.  Genetic Diversity of Meningococcal Serogroup B Vaccine Antigens among Carriage Isolates Collected from Students at Three Universities in the United States, 2015-2016.

Authors:  Henju Marjuki; How-Yi Chang; Nadav Topaz; Melissa J Whaley; Jeni Vuong; Alexander Chen; Laurel T Jenkins; Fang Hu; Susanna Schmink; Adam C Retchless; Jennifer D Thomas; Anna M Acosta; Lucy A McNamara; Heidi M Soeters; Sarah Mbaeyi; Xin Wang
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 7.867

3.  Potential Coverage of the 4CMenB Vaccine against Invasive Serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis Isolated from 2009 to 2013 in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Robert M Mulhall; Desiree Bennett; Robert Cunney; Ray Borrow; Jay Lucidarme; Jamie Findlow; Keith A Jolley; James Bray; Martin C J Maiden; Monica Moschioni; Laura Serino; Maria Stella; Duccio Medini
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.389

Review 4.  The Development of a Vaccine Against Meningococcus B Using Reverse Vaccinology.

Authors:  Vega Masignani; Mariagrazia Pizza; E Richard Moxon
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Meningococcal Group B Vaccine For The Prevention Of Invasive Meningococcal Disease Caused By Neisseria meningitidis Serogroup B.

Authors:  Irene Rivero-Calle; Peter Francis Raguindin; Jose Gómez-Rial; Carmen Rodriguez-Tenreiro; Federico Martinón-Torres
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  The Serogroup B Meningococcal Vaccine Bexsero Elicits Antibodies to Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Evgeny A Semchenko; Aimee Tan; Ray Borrow; Kate L Seib
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  US College Students Are at Increased Risk for Serogroup B Meningococcal Disease.

Authors:  Gary S Marshall; Amanda F Dempsey; Amit Srivastava; Raul E Isturiz
Journal:  J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.164

8.  Culture-Confirmed Invasive Meningococcal Disease in Canada, 2010 to 2014: Characterization of Serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis Strains and Their Predicted Coverage by the 4CMenB Vaccine.

Authors:  Raymond S W Tsang; Dennis K S Law; Rosita De Paola; Maria Giuliani; Maria Stella; Jianwei Zhou; Saul Deng; Giuseppe Boccadifuoco; Marzia Monica Giuliani; Laura Serino
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.389

9.  Genomic Characterization of Invasive Meningococcal Serogroup B Isolates and Estimation of 4CMenB Vaccine Coverage in Finland.

Authors:  Margherita Bodini; Alessandro Brozzi; Maria Giuliani; Hanna Nohynek; Anni Vainio; Markku Kuusi; Rosita De Paola; Mariagrazia Pizza; Duccio Medini; Maija Toropainen; Laura Serino; Alessandro Muzzi
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.389

Review 10.  Broad vaccine protection against Neisseria meningitidis using factor H binding protein.

Authors:  Jamie Findlow; Christopher D Bayliss; Peter T Beernink; Ray Borrow; Paul Liberator; Paul Balmer
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.