| Literature DB >> 29152548 |
Huyen T Nguyen1, Amir Mortazavi2, Kamal S Pohar3, Debra L Zynger4, Lai Wei5, Zarine K Shah1, Guang Jia1,6,7, Michael V Knopp1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is a critical unmet need to predict chemosensitivity in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Quantification of tumor heterogeneity has been shown to be useful in the assessment of therapeutic response. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is derived from diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) to quantify the water diffusivity which characterizes micro-cellularity in tumor tissues.Entities:
Keywords: Bladder cancer; chemotherapeutic response; diffusion-weighted imaging; micro-cellularity; tumor heterogeneity; water diffusivity
Year: 2017 PMID: 29152548 PMCID: PMC5676757 DOI: 10.3233/BLC-170110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bladder Cancer
Fig.1RECIST response of a ypT2aN0 case. Left (axial, coronal, sagittal) T2W images show that the targeted tumor was measured at 4.36 cm in the longest diameter before chemotherapy. Right (axial, coronal, sagittal) T2W images show that the targeted tumor was not seen after chemotherapy.
The distribution of pTN stages among 20 cases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
| ypTN stage | ypT0N0 | ypTisN0 | ypT1N0 | ypT2aN0 | ypT2bN0 | ypT3aN0 | ypT3bN0 | ypT3bN1 |
| # of cases | 8 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Fig.2ADC heterogeneity in the bladder tumor of a responder (upper) vs. a non-responder (lower). Red contours illustrate the ROIs placed on the tumors. The color scale column is given on the right. ADC values are scaled with the color spectrum from the lowest ADC at the bottom to the highest ADC at the top of the column. Please note that higher micro-cellularity underlies lower ADC in tumor tissues. Responder (stage pT1N0): U = 0.08; E = 3.81; Non-responder (stage pT3bN0): U = 0.06; E = 4.12.
E and U in the groups of responders vs. non-responders
| Responders | Non-responders | ||
| ( | (N = 5) | ||
| U (Average±STD) | 0.09±0.02 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.01 |
| E (Average±STD) | 3.71±0.27 | 4.15±0.30 | <0.01 |
Fig.3The significant (P = 0.01) difference in Uniformity between responders and non-responders is illustrated in a boxplot (left) and a scatter plot (right). As shown on the scatter plot, fourteen out of fifteen responders had U > 0.07, four out of five non-responders had U < 0.07.
Fig.4The significant (P < 0.01) difference in Entropy between responders and non-responders is illustrated in a boxplot (left) and a scatter plot (right). The scatter plot demonstrates that fourteen responders had E≤4.0, four non-responders had E > 4.0.