| Literature DB >> 29152236 |
Marta Bou1,2, Gerd M Berge3, Grete Baeverfjord3, Trygve Sigholt4, Tone-Kari Østbye1, Bente Ruyter1,2.
Abstract
The present study aimed to determine the minimum requirements of the essential n-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) that can secure their health under challenging conditions in sea cages. Individually tagged Atlantic salmon were fed 2, 10 and 17 g/kg of EPA + DHA from 400 g until slaughter size (about 3·5 kg). The experimental fish reared in sea cages were subjected to the challenging conditions typically experienced under commercial production. Salmon receiving the lowest EPA + DHA levels showed lower growth rates in the earlier life stages, but no significant difference in final weights at slaughter. The fatty acid composition of various tissues and organs had remarkably changed. The decreased EPA + DHA in the different tissue membrane phospholipids were typically replaced by pro-inflammatory n-6 fatty acids, most markedly in the skin. The EPA + DHA levels were maintained at a higher level in the liver and erythrocytes than in the muscle, intestine and skin. After delousing at high water temperatures, the mortality rates were 63, 52 and 16 % in the salmon fed 2, 10 and 17 g/kg EPA + DHA. Low EPA + DHA levels also increased the liver, intestinal and visceral fat amount, reduced intervertebral space and caused mid-intestinal hyper-vacuolisation. Thus, 10 g/kg EPA + DHA in the Atlantic salmon diet, a level previously regarded as sufficient, was found to be too low to maintain fish health under demanding environmental conditions in sea cages.Entities:
Keywords: ARA, arachidonic acid; Aquafeed; DHA; EFA, essential fatty acid; EPA; Essential fatty acids; Fish nutritional requirements; NL, neutral lipid; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PL, phospholipid; PS, phosphatidylserine; VLC, very-long-chain; VO, vegetable oil
Year: 2017 PMID: 29152236 PMCID: PMC5672314 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2017.28
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Sci ISSN: 2048-6790
Ingredients and proximate composition of the experimental diets (7 mm)
| 2 g/kg EPA + DHA | 10 g/kg EPA + DHA | 17 g/kg EPA + DHA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation (%) | |||
| Poultry meal | 18·00 | 18·00 | – |
| Fish meal | – | – | 15·00 |
| Krill meal | 3·00 | 3·00 | 3·00 |
| Poultry oil | 15·00 | 6·51 | – |
| Rapeseed oil | 7·50 | 5·00 | 9·83 |
| Linseed oil | 5·00 | 5·00 | – |
| Fish oil | – | 11·08 | 17·19 |
| Soya protein concentrate | 24·97 | 25·00 | 25·00 |
| Wheat | 11·20 | 10·81 | 12·00 |
| Wheat gluten | – | – | 1·00 |
| Maize gluten | 5·00 | 5·00 | 7·00 |
| Pea protein | 5·14 | 6·15 | – |
| Horse beans dehulled | – | – | 8·05 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 1·24 | 1·21 | 1·90 |
| Amino acids | 1·09 | 0·44 | 0·83 |
| Vitamin C, 35 % | – | – | 0·06 |
| Vitamin E, 50 % | – | – | 0·03 |
| Process additives | 0·33 | 0·33 | 0·28 |
| Ethoxyquin 66·6 %, dry | 0·02 | 0·02 | – |
| Lucatin pink | 0·04 | 0·04 | 0·04 |
| Vitamin and minerals | – | – | 0·40 |
| Vitamin NOFIMA | 2·00 | 2·00 | – |
| Mineral NOFIMA | 0·52 | 0·52 | – |
| Yttrium | 0·05 | 0·05 | 0·05 |
| Chemical composition | |||
| DM (%) | 95·2 | 96·3 | 95·3 |
| Fat (%) | 32·4 | 34·5 | 31·6 |
| Proteins (%) | 37·3 | 36·1 | 36·2 |
| Ash (%) | 6·0 | 6·1 | 6·4 |
| Gross energy (MJ/kg) | 24·3 | 24·4 | 23·8 |
GePro.
Mix of North Atlantic and South American fish meal.
Aker BioMarine.
Rapeseed oil, crude.
Linseed oil, crude.
North Atlantic fish oil, mainly capelin.
Fatty acid composition (% of total) in the experimental diets
| 2 g/kg EPA + DHA | 10 g/kg EPA + DHA | 17 g/kg EPA + DHA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 : 0 | 1·0 | 3·3 | 4·5 |
| 16 : 0 | 14·2 | 11·9 | 8·3 |
| 18 : 0 | 4·2 | 3·2 | 1·5 |
| 20 : 0 | 0·3 | 0·3 | 0·4 |
| Σ SFA | 20·8 | 19·3 | 15·1 |
| 16 : 1 | 2·8 | 4·5 | 5·4 |
| 18 : 1 | 1·2 | 1·6 | 2·2 |
| 18 : 1 | 38·1 | 26·2 | 26·8 |
| 20 : 1 | 0·8 | 7·0 | 10·5 |
| 22 : 1 | 0·1 | 0·8 | 1·3 |
| 22 : 1 | 0·4 | 8·1 | 12·5 |
| 24 : 1 | 0·1 | 0·3 | 0·6 |
| Σ MUFA | 44·1 | 49·8 | 60·8 |
| 18 : 2 | 21·1 | 13·1 | 8·1 |
| 18 : 3 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·1 |
| 20 : 2 | 0·1 | 0·2 | 0·2 |
| 20 : 4 | 0·3 | 0·2 | 0·2 |
| Σ | 21·8 | 13·7 | 8·6 |
| 18 : 3 | 11·4 | 11·4 | 4·2 |
| 20 : 4 | 0·2 | 0·8 | 1·2 |
| 20 : 5 | 0·4 | 2·4 | 3·6 |
| 22 : 5 | 0·1 | 0·2 | 0·4 |
| 22 : 6 | 0·3 | 1·1 | 2·1 |
| Σ | 12·4 | 15·8 | 11·6 |
| Σ PUFA | 34·2 | 29·5 | 20·1 |
Also includes 12 : 0, 15 : 0, 17 : 0 and 24 : 0.
Also includes 14 : 1n-5, 15 : 1, 16 : 1n-5, 16 : 1n-9, 17 : 1n-7, 20 : 1n-7 and 22 : 1n-7.
Also includes 20 : 3n-6.
Also includes 18 : 3n-4.
Fig. 1.Radiography: detail of vertebral lesions. (a) Fused vertebrae, lesion located under the dorsal fin; (b) platyspondylia, located in caudal spine; (c) missing intervertebral space, lesion located in cranial spine. Dotted lines indicate the extent of the lesions.
Performance and tissue lipid content in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed three different dietary levels (2, 10 or 17 g/kg) of EPA + DHA from 400 g to slaughter size
(Mean values with their standard errors using individual fish as the statistical unit (n 50))
| 2 g/kg EPA + DHA | 10 g/kg EPA + DHA | 17 g/kg EPA + DHA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Mean | Mean | ANOVA: | ||||
| IBW (g) – start tanks on land | 369 | 12 | 356 | 14 | 341 | 14 | 0·35 |
| BW (g) – start sea cages | 1095b | 26 | 1183b | 31 | 1326a | 43 | <0·0001 |
| FBW (g) | 3346 | 80 | 3526 | 158 | 3515 | 200 | 0·65 |
| Length (cm) | 612 | 4·5 | 620 | 9·0 | 621 | 10·7 | 0·71 |
| HSI (%) | 1·27 | 0·02 | 1·30 | 0·04 | 1·23 | 0·03 | 0·19 |
| CSI (%) | 0·11 | 0·001 | 0·11 | 0·002 | 0·11 | 0·002 | 0·10 |
| Liver fat (%) | 9·1a | 0·72 | 6·8b | 0·51 | 7·6a,b | 0·37 | 0·02 |
| Muscle fat (%)* | 15·0a | 0·40 | 16·4a,b | 0·56 | 17·9b | 0·50 | 0·0006 |
| Intestine fat (%)* | 15·0a | 1·65 | 8·8b | 0·64 | 11·0a,b | 1·50 | 0·01 |
| Visceral fat score | 3·3a | 0·2 | 2·6b | 0·2 | 2·9a,b | 0·2 | 0·01 |
IBW, initial body weight; BW, body weight; FBW, final body weight; HSI, hepatosomatic index; CSI, cardiosomatic index.
a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference test).
* For muscle and intestine fat content, thirty fish were used.
Fatty acid composition (mg/g) in the fillet of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed different levels of EPA and DHA for 13 months
(Mean values with their standard errors; thirty fish are behind the analysis in each dietary group, being each sample originated from a pooled sample from two fish (n 15))
| 2 g/kg EPA + DHA | 10 g/kg EPA + DHA | 17 g/kg EPA + DHA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Mean | Mean | ||||
| 14 : 0 | 1·3c | 0·09 | 3·1b | 0·11 | 5·0a | 0·17 |
| 16 : 0 | 13·5 | 0·45 | 14·2 | 0·45 | 13·1 | 0·40 |
| 18 : 0 | 4·5a | 0·15 | 4·1a | 0·12 | 2·9b | 0·08 |
| Σ SFA | 19·8 | 0·66 | 22·0 | 0·70 | 21·7 | 0·66 |
| 16 : 1 | 3·0c | 0·12 | 4·9b | 0·17 | 6·5a | 0·21 |
| 18 : 1 | 1·9c | 0·10 | 2·6b | 0·11 | 3·4a | 0·08 |
| 18 : 1 | 40·2 | 1·29 | 36·2 | 1·03 | 39·1 | 1·24 |
| 20 : 1 | 2·1c | 0·20 | 6·7b | 0·24 | 12·4a | 0·48 |
| 22 : 1 | 0·9c | 0·21 | 6·0b | 0·25 | 12·5a | 0·64 |
| Σ MUFA | 51·7c | 1·69 | 61·6b | 1·86 | 79·5a | 2·57 |
| 18 : 2 | 19·0c | 0·62 | 15·8b | 0·40 | 12·8a | 0·38 |
| 20 : 3 | 0·8a | 0·06 | 0·6b | 0·04 | 0·5b | 0·01 |
| 20 : 4 | 0·5a | 0·01 | 0·4b | 0·02 | 0·3c | 0·01 |
| Σ | 22·2a | 0·73 | 18·4b | 0·48 | 15·1c | 0·44 |
| 18 : 3 | 8·7b | 0·28 | 9·8a | 0·28 | 4·6c | 0·16 |
| 20 : 5 | 1·5c | 0·07 | 2·5b | 0·12 | 3·2a | 0·19 |
| 22 : 5 | 0·5c | 0·02 | 0·8b | 0·04 | 1·3a | 0·04 |
| 22 : 6 | 1·6c | 0·09 | 2·8b | 0·08 | 3·9a | 0·08 |
| EPA + DHA | 3·1c | 0·14 | 5·3b | 0·16 | 7·1a | 0·23 |
| Σ | 12·7b | 0·41 | 16·7a | 0·41 | 13·6b | 0·39 |
| 1·8a | 0·03 | 1·1b | 0·01 | 1·1b | 0·01 | |
a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference test).
Also includes 15 : 0, 17 : 0, 20 : 0 and 24 : 0.
Also includes 14 : 1n-5, 16 : 1n-5, 16 : 1n-9, 17 : 1n-7, 20 : 1n-7, 20 : 1n-11, 22 : 1 n-7 and 24 : 1n-9.
Also includes 18 : 3n-6 and 20 : 2n-6.
Also includes 20 : 3n-3.
Fatty acid composition (% of total) in the liver of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed different levels of EPA and DHA for 13 months
(Mean values with their standard errors; thirty fish are behind the analysis in each dietary group, being each sample originated from a pooled sample from two fish (n 15))
| Liver PL | Liver NL | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 g/kg EPA + DHA | 10 g/kg EPA + DHA | 17 g/kg EPA + DHA | 2 g/kg EPA + DHA | 10 g/kg EPA + DHA | 17 g/kg EPA + DHA | |||||||
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | |||||||
| 16 : 0 | 10·7b | 0·33 | 12·8a | 0·56 | 12·2a | 0·32 | 7·9b | 0·30 | 10·2a | 0·40 | 9·9a | 0·27 |
| 18 : 0 | 6·7a | 0·13 | 6·2a | 0·19 | 4·5b | 0·12 | 6·4a | 0·21 | 4·8b | 0·15 | 4·1b | 0·20 |
| Σ SFA | 18·2b | 0·41 | 20·2a | 0·67 | 18·7a,b | 0·38 | 16·1b | 0·46 | 17·9b | 0·52 | 17·6a,b | 0·46 |
| 16 : 1 | 1·5b | 0·12 | 1·9b | 0·16 | 2·4a | 0·10 | 3·1c | 0·15 | 4·3b | 0·22 | 5·0a | 0·10 |
| 18 : 1 | 29·2a | 0·79 | 21·7b | 0·99 | 20·6b | 0·52 | 41·4a | 1·45 | 31·7b | 1·07 | 28·8b | 0·75 |
| 20 : 1 | 1·8c | 0·06 | 3·8b | 0·22 | 5·8a | 0·20 | 3·2c | 0·12 | 6·1b | 0·28 | 8·6a | 0·31 |
| Σ MUFA | 34·9a | 0·92 | 30·4b | 1·26 | 32·8a,b | 0·80 | 52·0 | 1·39 | 48·1 | 1·50 | 51·4 | 1·08 |
| 18 : 2 | 11·9a | 0·26 | 7·5b | 0·15 | 5·3c | 0·12 | 14·1a | 0·37 | 10·1b | 0·16 | 7·2c | 0·28 |
| 20 : 3 | 3·4a | 0·14 | 1·5b | 0·05 | 0·8c | 0·04 | 1·7a | 0·12 | 0·8b | 0·04 | 0·6b | 0·07 |
| 20 : 4 | 5·0a | 0·14 | 3·1b | 0·14 | 1·5c | 0·05 | 1·0 | 0·18 | 0·7 | 0·12 | 0·6 | 0·09 |
| Σ | 22·3a | 0·36 | 13·7b | 0·15 | 8·8c | 0·15 | 19·3a | 0·41 | 13·4b | 0·24 | 10·0c | 0·26 |
| 18 : 3 | 3·2a | 0·13 | 2·8b | 0·14 | 1·1c | 0·04 | 4·8b | 0·16 | 5·7a | 0·16 | 2·5c | 0·08 |
| 20 : 4 | 0·1c | 0·01 | 0·6b | 0·04 | 0·7a | 0·02 | 0·2c | 0·05 | 1·2b | 0·07 | 1·5a | 0·06 |
| 20 : 5 | 6·3c | 0·21 | 9·1b | 0·36 | 10·6a | 0·22 | 1·8b | 0·25 | 4·0a | 0·46 | 3·9a | 0·29 |
| 22 : 5 | 2·3c | 0·10 | 2·8b | 0·10 | 3·1a | 0·04 | 0·4b | 0·06 | 0·8a | 0·12 | 0·9a | 0·11 |
| 22 : 6 | 8·9c | 0·34 | 16·0b | 0·56 | 18·9a | 0·38 | 1·0b | 0·18 | 3·4a | 0·72 | 3·1a | 0·35 |
| Σ | 21·2c | 0·48 | 31·7b | 0·67 | 34·7a | 0·50 | 8·6c | 0·56 | 15·7a | 1·14 | 12·3b | 0·66 |
| 1·06a | 0·03 | 0·43b | 0·01 | 0·25c | 0·01 | 2·32a | 0·10 | 0·90b | 0·05 | 0·83b | 0·03 | |
| Σ Fatty acids (mg/g) | 15·3 | 0·8 | 14·0 | 1·0 | 14·2 | 0·7 | 23·6a | 3·4 | 14·0b | 2·2 | 13·3b | 1·3 |
PL, phospholipids; NL, neutral lipids.
a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference test).
Also includes 14 : 0, 15 : 0, 17 : 0, 20 : 0 and 22 : 0.
Also includes 14 : 1n-5, 15 : 1, 16 : 1n-9, 17 : 1n-7, 18 : 1n-7, 18 : 1n-11 and 24 : 1n-9.
Also includes 18 : 3n-6 and 20 : 2n-6.
Also includes 18 : 3n-3 and 20 : 3n-3.
Fatty acid composition (% of total) in the erythrocytes of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed different levels of EPA and DHA for 13 months
(Mean values with their standard errors; thirty fish are behind the analysis in each dietary group, being each sample originated from a pooled sample from two fish (n 15))
| 2 g/kg EPA + DHA | 10 g/kg EPA + DHA | 17 g/kg EPA + DHA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Mean | Mean | ||||
| 16 : 0 | 16·2b | 0·19 | 17·1a | 0·12 | 16·4b | 0·15 |
| 18 : 0 | 7·5a | 0·19 | 6·5b | 0·23 | 5·7c | 0·18 |
| Σ SFA | 24·5 | 0·23 | 25·0 | 0·27 | 24·5 | 0·33 |
| 18 : 1 | 1·4c | 0·01 | 1·6b | 0·04 | 1·9a | 0·04 |
| 18 : 1 | 13·7a | 0·35 | 11·2b | 0·44 | 8·9c | 0·37 |
| 20 : 1 | 1·1c | 0·03 | 2·5b | 0·21 | 3·8a | 0·11 |
| Σ MUFA | 17·3 | 0·50 | 17·6 | 0·68 | 17·8 | 0·46 |
| 18 : 2 | 10·2a | 0·29 | 6·4b | 0·15 | 4·0c | 0·13 |
| 18 : 3 | 0·4a | 0·03 | 0·1b | 0·02 | 0·1b | 0·05 |
| 20 : 2 | 1·4a | 0·04 | 1·0b | 0·04 | 0·8c | 0·02 |
| 20 : 3 | 3·4a | 0·08 | 1·2b | 0·03 | 0·6c | 0·02 |
| 20 : 4 | 5·4a | 0·14 | 3·0b | 0·12 | 1·9c | 0·09 |
| Σ | 20·8a | 0·34 | 11·6b | 0·12 | 7·3c | 0·18 |
| 18 : 3 | 3·1a | 0·09 | 2·6b | 0·21 | 1·0c | 0·04 |
| 20 : 3 | 0·8a | 0·04 | 0·6b | 0·02 | 0·2c | 0·02 |
| 20 : 5 | 9·6c | 0·23 | 12·4b | 0·39 | 14·1a | 0·31 |
| 22 : 5 | 3·7 | 0·10 | 3·5 | 0·11 | 3·8 | 0·10 |
| 22 : 6 | 16·4c | 0·54 | 22·7b | 0·77 | 27·6a | 0·36 |
| Σ | 33·7c | 0·72 | 42·2b | 0·73 | 47·1a | 0·58 |
| 0·62a | 0·02 | 0·28b | 0·01 | 0·16c | 0·00 | |
a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference test).
Also includes 12 : 0, 14 : 0 and 17 : 0.
Also includes 16 : 1n-7, 18 : 1n-11 and 24 : 1n-9.
Also includes 20 : 4n-3.
Fig. 2.Fatty acids (FA; measured as the percentage of total FA) in the intestine and skin phospholipid classes phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylinositol (PI) of salmon fed three different dietary levels: 2, 10 or 17 g/kg EPA + DHA from 400 g to slaughter size. Data are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. A total of thirty fish are behind the analysis in each dietary group, being each sample originated from a pooled sample from two fish (n 15).
Fig. 3.Intestinal health score based on the method developed by BioMar. All sampled fish were evaluated (n 50).
Fig. 4.Histology of mid-intestinal mucosa in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). (a) Normal mucosa, tip of mucosal fold. (b) Mucosa with increased vacuolisation in supranuclear region of enterocytes (stars). Lu, intestinal lumen; Nu, nuclei of enterocytes; Go, goblet cells (mucus production); arrowheads, basal lamina. Haematoxylin and eosin, 600×.
Radiography of fish at the end of the experiment*
(Mean values with their standard errors and percentages; n 50)
| 2 g/kg EPA + DHA | 10 g/kg EPA + DHA | 17 g/kg EPA + DHA | Average mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No remark (%) | 38a | 35a | 56b | 45 |
| Fusions (%) | 9·2 | 11·6 | 16·5 | 12·9 |
| Average size of lesion | ||||
| Mean | 3·0 | 3·0 | 4·9 | 4·0 |
| | 1·7 | 1·5 | 3·3 | |
| Platyspondylia (%) | 4·6 | 8·7 | 3·3 | 5·3 |
| Average size of lesion | ||||
| Mean | 25 | 8·8 | 21 | 16 |
| | 9·2 | 5·7 | 9·2 | |
| Missing intervertebral space (%) | 30·8a | 30·4a | 6·6b | 20·9 |
| Average size of lesion | ||||
| Mean | 4·1 | 3·9 | 4·7 | 4·1 |
| | 1·9 | 1·6 | 1·2 | |
| Length:height ratio of vertebrae | ||||
| Mean | 0·95a | 0·96a,b | 0·97b | 0·96 |
| | 0·035 | 0·042 | 0·035 | |
| Reduced length:height ratio (%) | 27 | 27 | 22 | 25 |
a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference test).
* Classification of lesions into main groups (presented as percentage of fish in group) and quantification of size of lesion (no. of affected vertebrae per fish with this type of lesion). Length:height ratio was measured in five vertebrae per fish (vertebrae no. 32–36).
Fig. 5.Radiography: detail of vertebrae with different length:height ratios. (a) Vertebra with normal proportions, length:height ratio about 1; (b) vertebra with reduced length, length:height ratio 0·92. Outlines of structures are indicated by dotted lines.