Dan A Greenberg1,2, Wendy J Palen2, Arne Ø Mooers1. 1. Department of Biological Sciences and Crawford Laboratory of Evolutionary Studies Simon Fraser University Burnaby BC Canada. 2. Department of Biological Sciences and Earth to Ocean Research Group Simon Fraser University Burnaby BC Canada.
Abstract
The fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (B. dendrobatidis) has emerged as a major agent of amphibian extinction, requiring conservation intervention for many susceptible species. Identifying susceptible species is challenging, but many aspects of species biology are predicted to influence the evolution of host resistance, tolerance, or avoidance strategies towards disease. In turn, we may expect species exhibiting these distinct strategies to differ in their ability to survive epizootic disease outbreaks. Here, we test for phylogenetic and trait-based patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection risk and infection intensity among 302 amphibian species by compiling a global data set of B. dendrobatidis infection surveys across 95 sites. We then use best-fit models that associate traits, taxonomy and environment with B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity to predict host disease mitigation strategies (tolerance, resistance, avoidance) for 122 Neotropical amphibian species that experienced epizootic B. dendrobatidis outbreaks, and noted species persistence or extinction from these events. Aspects of amphibian species life history, habitat use and climatic niche were consistently linked to variation in B. dendrobatidis infection patterns across sites around the world. However, predicted B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity based on site environment and species traits did not reveal a consistent pattern between the predicted host disease mitigation strategy and extinction outcome. This suggests that either tolerant or resistant species may have no advantage in ameliorating disease during epizootic events, or that other factors drive the persistence of amphibian populations during chytridiomycosis outbreaks. These results suggest that using a trait-based approach may allow us to identify species with resistance or tolerance to endemic B. dendrobatidis infections, but that this approach may be insufficient to ultimately identify species at risk of extinction from epizootics.
The fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (B. dendrobatidis) has emerged as a major agent of amphibian extinction, requiring conservation intervention for many susceptible species. Identifying susceptible species is challenging, but many aspects of species biology are predicted to influence the evolution of host resistance, tolerance, or avoidance strategies towards disease. In turn, we may expect species exhibiting these distinct strategies to differ in their ability to survive epizootic disease outbreaks. Here, we test for phylogenetic and trait-based patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection risk and infection intensity among 302 amphibian species by compiling a global data set of B. dendrobatidis infection surveys across 95 sites. We then use best-fit models that associate traits, taxonomy and environment with B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity to predict host disease mitigation strategies (tolerance, resistance, avoidance) for 122 Neotropical amphibian species that experienced epizootic B. dendrobatidis outbreaks, and noted species persistence or extinction from these events. Aspects of amphibian species life history, habitat use and climatic niche were consistently linked to variation in B. dendrobatidis infection patterns across sites around the world. However, predicted B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity based on site environment and species traits did not reveal a consistent pattern between the predicted host disease mitigation strategy and extinction outcome. This suggests that either tolerant or resistant species may have no advantage in ameliorating disease during epizootic events, or that other factors drive the persistence of amphibian populations during chytridiomycosis outbreaks. These results suggest that using a trait-based approach may allow us to identify species with resistance or tolerance to endemic B. dendrobatidis infections, but that this approach may be insufficient to ultimately identify species at risk of extinction from epizootics.
Identifying the most at‐risk species in a community has emerged as a key goal in conservation to direct limited funding to those species most in need (Bottrill et al., 2008). Comparative analyses that can link aspects of species biology and exposure to threats can potentially be used to predict risk for data‐poor species and understudied regions (Bland, Collen, Orme, & Bielby, 2015; Cardillo & Meijaard, 2012). These analyses can then be used to identify species that are susceptible to population declines and so that are most likely to benefit from management intervention.Amphibians are one of the most threatened vertebrate classes, with thousands of species at risk of extinction (Hoffmann et al., 2010; Stuart et al., 2004). A major driver of amphibian extinction is the disease chytridiomycosis, caused by the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (B. dendrobatidis) (Berger et al., 1998; Stuart et al., 2004). Over a hundred amphibian species may have already been driven to extinction by this disease (Skerratt et al., 2007), and B. dendrobatidis ‐induced declines continue across the world (Catenazzi, Lehr, Rodriguez, & Vredenburg, 2011; Hirschfeld et al., 2016; Woodhams et al., 2008). There is concern that future extinctions may occur through the spread of different B. dendrobatidis strains, particularly virulent strains to naïve regions (Fisher & Garner, 2007; Kolby et al., 2015; Skerratt et al., 2007), or through the emergence of new fungal pathogens (Martel et al., 2014). Not all species are equally susceptible to B. dendrobatidis infection or the disease chytridiomycosis (Gahl, Longcore, & Houlahan, 2012; Searle et al., 2011), and patterns of both B. dendrobatidis infection and associated population declines vary widely among taxonomic groups (Baláž et al., 2014; Bancroft et al., 2011; Stuart et al., 2004). Therefore, understanding both the mechanistic basis of susceptibility and how to identify susceptible species a priori is a key question for proactive management strategies such as establishing amphibian ex situ holdings before B. dendrobatidis spreads to the few remaining naïve regions (Mendelson et al., 2006; Olson et al., 2013).The disease susceptibility of any host is the product of its ability to avoid exposure to the pathogen, its ability to resist infection when pathogens are encountered, and its tolerance of the pathological effects of infection (Medzhitov, Schneider, & Soares, 2012). These axes of disease susceptibility are recognized as representing distinct evolutionary strategies to cope with disease by either limiting potential infections or offsetting the fitness consequences of infections, with presumed trade‐offs associated with each strategy (Råberg, Sim, & Read, 2007; Roy & Kirchner, 2000). In turn, these different strategies predict different patterns of pathogen infection risk (i.e., the probability of both encountering and becoming infected by a pathogen) and intensity (i.e., the pathogen load) for sympatric hosts within an infected community (Roy & Kirchner, 2000). Avoidant species are those that minimize their risk of pathogen contact, primarily through behaviours that may limit overlap between host and pathogen in the environment (e.g., avoidance of water; Rowley & Alford, 2007). Species adopting an avoidance strategy should have a relatively low risk of infection due to low pathogen encounter rates, but when infected suffer a high infection intensity due to a lack of resistance mechanisms. If pathogen encounter rates are high, and largely unavoidable, then selection may favour alternative tactics based on resistance or tolerance mechanisms (Donnelly, White, & Boots, 2015; Roy & Kirchner, 2000). Resistant species could have high or low infection risk (depending on their ability to resist initial infection), but generally exhibit comparatively low intensity infections. Tolerant species are expected to exhibit both high infection risk and high infection intensity, but unexpectedly low mortality. Finally, species with both low infection risk and intensity could exhibit either an avoidance or resistance strategy. Species fitting this profile could also possess elements of both strategies by retaining resistance mechanisms while avoiding the pathogen, but this strategy is likely to be rare given expected trade‐offs. It is generally expected that highly tolerant or resistant species are typically less susceptible to population‐level decline associated with emerging infectious diseases (Reeder, Pessier, & Vredenburg, 2012; Woodhams et al., 2006), and therefore, these species would be of low priority for proactive conservation management.The disease outcome for any infected host is dictated by the interactions between host susceptibility, pathogen virulence and their environmental context (James et al., 2015). This complex interaction can confound our ability to understand why certain species suffer a higher pathogen burden when comparing across distinct pathogen strains and geographic locations. However, examining patterns of relative infection risk and intensity across hosts from the same infected community, and therefore experiencing the same pathogen and environmental conditions, may allow us to identify patterns of infection consistent with these evolutionary disease mitigation strategies (Figure 1). If we assume that hosts in these infected communities have the same potential exposure to the pathogen, then differences in infection prevalence across hosts can be attributed to differences in infection risk and differences in infection intensity can reflect their ability to resist or tolerate the pathogen when infected. Comparing infection patterns across hosts, sampled in the same space and time, provides the opportunity to test whether aspects of hosts' biology may be associated with a particular disease mitigation strategy.
Figure 1
Conceptual outline for predicted patterns of pathogen infection risk and intensity for different host strategies to manage disease. Tolerant hosts would be characterized by a high risk and high infection intensity, as these hosts invest in ameliorating the fitness costs of infection. Resistant hosts are expected to have higher risk, but low levels of infection. Avoidant hosts will have low infection risk, but when infected, suffer a high infection intensity due to a lack of resistance mechanisms. Finally, a host with both lower risk and lower infection intensity could be resistant, avoidant, or both
Conceptual outline for predicted patterns of pathogen infection risk and intensity for different host strategies to manage disease. Tolerant hosts would be characterized by a high risk and high infection intensity, as these hosts invest in ameliorating the fitness costs of infection. Resistant hosts are expected to have higher risk, but low levels of infection. Avoidant hosts will have low infection risk, but when infected, suffer a high infection intensity due to a lack of resistance mechanisms. Finally, a host with both lower risk and lower infection intensity could be resistant, avoidant, or bothIt has been established that some amphibian species appear to be more tolerant to B. dendrobatidis infection (Reeder et al., 2012; Searle et al., 2011), while others possess various mechanisms to resist infection (Ellison et al., 2015; Eskew, Worth, Foley, & Todd, 2015), and differences in species ability to avoid infection can arise from their ecology and behaviour (Burrowes, Martes, Torres‐Ríos, & Longo, 2017; Richards‐Zawacki, 2010; Rowley & Alford, 2007). A diverse set of traits appear to influence these disease mitigation strategies in amphibians, including immune system defences (Ellison et al., 2015; Savage & Zamudio, 2011), antimicrobrial peptides (Woodhams et al., 2006) and skin microbiota (Harris, James, Lauer, Simon, & Patel, 2006), which have all been linked to variation in susceptibility to chytridiomycosis. Many other aspects of species biology, including their life history, ecology, behaviour or physiology, also have the potential to influence the evolution of avoidance, resistance and tolerance strategies (Han, Schmidt, Bowden, & Drake, 2015; Johnson et al., 2012; Nowakowski et al., 2016). Although ecological traits offer a less direct, mechanistic link to avoidance, resistance and tolerance, data for these traits are more readily available for a broad range of species compared to the few species that have been directly assessed for B. dendrobatidis susceptibility (Ellison et al., 2015; Gahl et al., 2012; Searle et al., 2011). If particular biological traits are consistently associated with avoidance, resistance or tolerance strategies, then this may provide a shortcut to identify susceptible species in amphibian assemblages at risk of B. dendrobatidis outbreaks.Patterns of population declines and local extinctions among species following B. dendrobatidis epizootics have given us some insight into the particular traits that appear to confer susceptibility to chytridiomycosis (Bielby, Cooper, Cunningham, Garner, & Purvis, 2008; Lips, Reeve, & Witters, 2003; Smith, Lips, & Chase, 2009). Traits associated with species decline due to chytridiomycosis include aquatic habitats, small geographic range size, large body size and low fecundity (Bielby et al., 2008; Lips et al., 2003). Physiology has emerged as another important component of infection risk, as species with high thermal tolerance can both preferentially select higher temperatures to help clear infections (a resistance mechanism) or reduce their exposure to the pathogens by occupying microhabitats outside the thermal growth range of B. dendrobatidis (an avoidance mechanism) (Catenazzi, Lehr, & Vredenburg, 2014; Nowakowski et al., 2016; Richards‐Zawacki, 2010). A species overall exposure to B. dendrobatidis in its environment may also subsume any effects of host biology on patterns of both infection and population decline (Murray & Skerratt, 2012; Murray et al., 2011), and therefore, exposure is important to account for given that B. dendrobatidis infection risk can vary considerably across environments (Liu, Rohr, & Li, 2012). Evolutionary history may be related to B. dendrobatidis ‐induced extinctions, with conflicting evidence suggesting that B. dendrobatidis epizootics either homogenize amphibian diversity (Smith et al., 2009), or alternatively cause phylogenetically random extinctions (Crawford, Lips, & Bermingham, 2010). This suggests that a combination of species traits and evolutionary history, when accounting for exposure and environmental conditions, may allow us to identify evolutionary strategies of avoidance, resistance and tolerance among species, and link these strategies to risk of extinction from chytridiomycosis epizootics.There have been no direct tests of whether tolerance, resistance or avoidance strategies are correlated with differential survival from chytridiomycosis epizootics across species, but we can derive some predictions from both observation and theory. It has been observed that tolerant species can persist in infected sites despite the extinction of more susceptible species (Reeder et al., 2012; Retallick, McCallum, & Speare, 2004), suggesting that tolerant species may have a higher survival probability during chytridiomycosis epizootics. For resistant species, survival may depend on whether hosts can sustain the fitness costs of resistance when infection rates and, subsequently infection intensity, increase during epizootic events (Briggs, Knapp, & Vredenburg, 2010; Roy & Kirchner, 2000), or if these heightened rates of transmission may overwhelm host defences leading to mortality. We may expect that avoidant species may disproportionately suffer during epizootics due to low investment in resistance or tolerance mechanisms (Medzhitov et al., 2012); however, if these avoidant hosts can consistently limit exposure, this may increase their probability of survival relative to resistant or tolerant species. Understanding how extinction risk varies across these distinct disease strategies is critical if we aim to manage species based on their ability to resist, tolerate or avoid B. dendrobatidis infections.Here, we take advantage of the numerous surveys for B. dendrobatidis that have been conducted across the globe to compile a data set of 95 amphibian assemblages representing 302 species that have been exposed to B. dendrobatidis (Figure 2). We use this data set to ask how differences in hosts' evolutionary history and traits, while accounting for pathogen and environmental context, contribute to B. dendrobatidis infection risk and infection intensity within these assemblages. We further explore whether trait profiles related to tolerance, avoidance or resistance are associated with survival during B. dendrobatidis epizootics using our models to predict B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity for 122 species from five sites in the Neotropics that have experienced B. dendrobatidis ‐induced local extinctions and compare that to patterns of species loss. This approach allows us to examine how species traits relate to disease mitigation strategies, and retrospectively ask whether these traits can in turn explain regional patterns of species decline and extinction from B. dendrobatidis epizootics.
Figure 2
Global map illustrating the 95 amphibian assemblages surveyed for Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis from the literature, with each point scaled to the number of species and coloured according to the site‐level infection prevalence
Global map illustrating the 95 amphibian assemblages surveyed for Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis from the literature, with each point scaled to the number of species and coloured according to the site‐level infection prevalence
METHODS
We followed a multistep analytical approach: analysing global phylogenetic patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity, modelling the role of traits, taxonomy, environment and exposure, and subsequently predicting B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity for species from sites experiencing local extinctions in the Neotropics to evaluate if regional extinction patterns differ among the predicted evolutionary strategies (e.g. tolerance, avoidance, resistance) of hosts towards disease (Figure 1).
Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection data
We conducted a survey of literature spanning the initial discovery of B. dendrobatidis (Berger et al., 1998) up to December 2014, including published journal articles and electronic theses, to identify studies containing information on B. dendrobatidis infection prevalence (proportion of individuals infected) across multiple species within a given location. We also considered data from the Global B. dendrobatidis ‐Mapping Project (www.bd-maps.net
; Olson et al., 2013), grouping species entries with the same listed sampling date and location as a single site and study for our analysis. We only included B. dendrobatidis prevalence data for a species if it had at least five postmetamorphic individuals tested in a given site to ensure a sufficient sampling effort to estimate infection risk and to focus on the postmetamorphic life stages that experience different infection dynamics and experience a much greater fitness cost to infection (Briggs et al., 2010). We only included sites with at least two species present to compare how infection risk varies between species experiencing the same pathogen strain and environmental conditions. We also only included sites with a minimum total infection prevalence of 10% to prevent zero inflation due to low exposure. Only PCR‐based assays of B. dendrobatidis infection were considered for consistency. Finally, sampling had to have occurred over the same sampling period (as determined by the author—e.g., those from different sample seasons or years were excluded) for all species within a site to control for the potential variation in pathogen strains and environmental conditions that could confound comparisons between hosts. The vast majority of studies were in systems where B. dendrobatidis infections are presumed to be endemic due to a lack of mass mortality at the specific time point of sampling, although in many cases epizootic events may have occurred before or after B. dendrobatidis sampling occurred. When estimates of zoospore loads, measured in genomic equivalents, were available from tested individuals, we also retained this information to model infection intensity.Our literature search yielded a total of 47 studies that met our criteria. This data set (infection prevalence) represents a total of 20,512 swabbed individuals from 504 species‐by‐site observations (median = 18; range = 5–814 per species by site). In total, this data set covers 302 amphibian species from 42 families and includes 95 sites located across seven biogeographic realms (Figure 2). A subset of 19 studies also contained records of zoospore loads from infected individuals (infection intensity), representing 3,381 individuals from 188 species‐by‐site observations (median = 6; range = 1–470), covering 139 species from 33 families in 34 sites.
Phylogenetic patterns
To examine patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection in relation to phylogeny, we placed the 302 species on a time‐scaled phylogeny from Pyron and Wiens (2011). Sixty‐six species absent from this phylogeny were placed using close relatives (Table S1). To test if taxonomic affiliations can capture any phylogenetic signal in B. dendrobatidis infection patterns, we also created a phylogeny based on taxonomy (Fig. S1).
Trait predictors
We identified 14 biological traits explaining species life history (N = 3), climatic niche (N = 4), behaviour (N = 3) and habitat use (N = 4), which may all influence susceptibility to B. dendrobatidis infections based on the current literature (Table 1; details in Appendix A). All traits were scored at the species level, as detailed population‐level trait data are unavailable for the vast majority of cases.
Table 1
Species‐level trait predictors used to model amphibian Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection prevalence (N = 302 species) and infection intensity (N = 139 species), and for assessing disease strategies of amphibians in epizootic sites (N = 122 species). The predicted positive (+), negative (−) or neutral (=), associations of each trait to avoidance, resistance and tolerance disease mitigation strategies is indicated
Predictor (units)
Type
Description
Predicted association with each disease strategy
Avoidance
Resistance
Tolerance
Body size (mm)
Life history
Mean or mid‐point of male SVL
−
=
+
Clutch size (eggs per clutch)
Life history
Mid‐point of min and max number
=
−
−
Age to sexual Maturity (years)
Life history
Mean time to sexual maturity
−
+
+
Larval habitat (categorical)
Habitat
OP:opportunistic (ponds and streams); PB:ponds; SB:streams; TR:terrestrial
Mean annual temp across a species geographic range (Bio1)
+
+
=
Thermal niche breadth (°C)
Climatic niche
Mean difference between max and min temp across a species range (Bio7)
+
+
=
Hydric niche position (mm)
Climatic niche
Mean annual precipitation across a species range (Bio12)
−
=/+
=/+
Hydric niche breadth (0‐inf)
Climatic niche
Coefficient of variation in precipitation in a species range (Bio15)
+
+
=
Parental care (factor)
Behaviour
Presence (1) or absence (0) of parental care of young
−
+
=
Migratory (factor)
Behaviour
Presence (1) or absence (0) of migratory behaviour
−
=
=
Breeding system (factor)
Behaviour
Presence of explosive (1) or prolonged (0) breeding systems
−/+
−/+
=
Species‐level trait predictors used to model amphibian Batrachochytrium dendrobatidisinfection prevalence (N = 302 species) and infection intensity (N = 139 species), and for assessing disease strategies of amphibians in epizootic sites (N = 122 species). The predicted positive (+), negative (−) or neutral (=), associations of each trait to avoidance, resistance and tolerance disease mitigation strategies is indicatedAmphibian natural history still has many gaps, and only 107 species (35%) in our data set had complete coverage for all traits (Table S2). To maximize our coverage to infer trait‐based patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection, we imputed missing data for species where we could not collect all traits from the literature. We used two established methods of phylogenetic imputation to estimate missing traits (Penone et al., 2014; Guenard, 2015); the details are in Appendix A. We evaluated the predictive accuracy for each trait using 10‐fold cross‐validation and took the average of five runs for the final imputed traits (Table S3).
Environmental predictors
Temperature and precipitation are known to influence the distribution and prevalence of B. dendrobatidis in wild amphibian populations (James et al., 2015; Murray et al., 2011; Nowakowski et al., 2016). We hypothesized that the traits conferring susceptibility to B. dendrobatidis infection may differ depending on environmental context. To incorporate trait–environment interactions, we created a climate index for each site (n = 95) by extracting 19 temperature and precipitation bioclimatic layers averaged over a 10 km radius around each site (Hijmans, Cameron, Parra, Jones, & Jarvis, 2005). These 19 correlated bioclimatic variables were decomposed into two major principal components that together described 70.2% of the variation. The first principal component loaded positively for warmer, aseasonal and rainy sites (54.0% of variation), and the second principal component loaded positively for annual precipitation and rainfall seasonality (16.2% of variation; Table S4).
Extinction data set
The consequences of B. dendrobatidis epizootics have been well documented in the Neotropics, providing an opportunity to test whether traits associated with resistance or tolerance strategies also confer a survival advantage during chytridiomycosis epizootics. For five sites where a known chytridiomycosis epizootic had occurred, we recorded species local persistence or extinction (Catenazzi et al., 2011; Crawford et al., 2010; Lips, 1998, 1999; Woodhams et al., 2008). This data set represented 122 species (20 species also in training data set; mean 30.6 species per site), with species loss ranging from 40% to 78.3% of total richness across sites (mean 55.2%). We collected the same trait and environmental data for each species and site as in the training data set.
Analysis
Phylogenetic signal of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infections
To first assess whether there was evidence for biology or evolutionary history affecting B. dendrobatidis infection prevalence and logarithmic zoospore load, we estimated Pagel's λ using the package MCMCglmm (Hadfield, 2010), which allowed us to control for site‐level exposure. Models were run for 1 × 106 generations with a burn in of 1 × 105 and a sampling interval of 200. For B. dendrobatidis prevalence, a binomial error distribution was used, and for infection intensity, we modelled the logarithmic genomic equivalents of B. dendrobatidis zoospores with a Gaussian error distribution. Both models used general uninformative priors. Site, study and phylogeny were all included as random effects. Pagel's λ was calculated as the estimated variance explained by the phylogeny relative to residual variance (Hadfield & Nakagawa, 2010).
Boosted regression trees
Following our phylogenetic analysis, we used the machine learning technique of boosted regression trees (BRTs) to model B. dendrobatidis infection prevalence and intensity. We cannot include fine‐grained phylogenetic signal with this method, but we note that taxonomic groupings (Order, Family and Genus) capture much of the signal (see Appendix A). BRTs have many advantages in that they fit numerous simple models, allow for interactions between variables and permit nonlinear responses from predictors (Bland et al., 2015; Elith, Leathwick, & Hastie, 2008). We modelled B. dendrobatidis prevalence as the logit‐transformed proportion of infected individuals per species per site with a Gaussian error distribution, and each measure of infection prevalence was weighted by the total number of sampled individuals. For B. dendrobatidis infection risk, we used the mean logarithmic genomic equivalents of B. dendrobatidis across individuals for each species per site with a Gaussian error distribution and weighted each estimate by the number of infected individuals. We modelled B. dendrobatidis infection prevalence and intensity based on 14 functional traits (Table 1), two site‐level environmental descriptors and taxonomic classifications for Family (N = 42) and Order (N = 3). Body size, clutch size and age at maturity were log‐transformed to improve their distributions, and discrete variables and taxon were coded as dummy variables. To account for differential exposure between sites, we included total site‐level infection prevalence of all species as an offset in the model; each species is modelled as under‐ or over‐infected relative to all species in that assemblage. We optimized the BRTs by varying the learning rate and tree complexity (final model for infection risk: lr = 0.002, tc = 10, bag fraction = 0.5; infection intensity: lr = 0.002, tc = 9, bag fraction = 0.5) and assessed model fit based on the mean residual and cross‐validated deviance. As BRTs have a stochastic model building process, we averaged the variable importance and fitted response for each predictor from five runs with the same tuning parameters.
Patterns of extinction
To determine whether traits associated with B. dendrobatidis infection also predispose species to extinction during chytridiomycosis epizootics, we used our models to predict B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity for species in five Neotropical amphibian communities that experienced epizootic extinction events. We averaged the predicted output from five BRT models. We tested whether avoidance, resistance or tolerance strategies were associated with a greater survival probability from chytridiomycosis epizootics by separating species into different strategies based on their predicted infection risk and intensity. We delineated the different evolutionary strategies for disease mitigation (e.g. avoidance, resistance, resistance/avoidance or tolerance, Figure 1) in our predicted data set, based on relative B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity across species, by creating quadrants using the median predicted infection risk and median predicted infection intensity and assigning populations to each quadrant. To verify the accuracy of this method, we identified eight species from the literature that are known to be susceptible, resistant or tolerant to B. dendrobatidis and estimated their predicted infection patterns and subsequent disease mitigation strategy, which performed reasonably well in discriminating species (see Table S7; Fig. S5). We conducted a chi‐square test to determine if the proportion of species that went extinct in each quadrant, representing these different evolutionary strategies, differed from what would be expected by chance. We also conducted tests at the site‐level, which were qualitatively the same (Fig. S6). All analyses were conducted in R v3.3.2.
RESULTS
Phylogenetic patterns of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection
Across 302 species of amphibians, we found that there was a moderate level of phylogenetic signal in B. dendrobatidis infection prevalence (Pagel's λ = 0.516, 95% highest posterior density intervals: 0.37, 0.59; Fig. S2), even when accounting for shared geography. For infection intensity, there was a low level of phylogenetic signal in the logarithmic genomic equivalents of zoospores across 139 species (Pagel's λ = 0.216, 95% HPD: 0.12, 0.33; Fig. S3).
Predictors of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection prevalence
Variation in Batrachochytrium dendrobatidisinfection prevalence across amphibians was explained in part by differences in many functional traits (pseudo‐R
2 = 0.47, range = 0.43–0.50; Figure 3), most with small individual effects (Figure 3). In order of importance (Table S5), species from climates with high rainfall seasonality (i.e., broad hydric niche breadth) had higher infection risk across sites (high: 19%–21%, low: 11%–12%; Figure 3a). Amphibians with a greater association with aquatic habitats (aquatic index) had greater risk of B. dendrobatidis infection (19%–22%), although fully aquatic species had lower risk (10.6%; Figure 3b). Contrary to our prediction, species that are highly specialized to one habitat had a lower risk of infection (8%) than species with broader habitat associations (18%–21%; Figure 3c).
Figure 3
Partial dependence plots illustrating the marginal effect (effect on risk, when all other predictors are averaged) of the top 12 predictors of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection prevalence, shown in order of variable importance (indicated by value in parenthesis for each predictor). Background histograms indicate the count distribution of each predictor across the 302 species or 95 sites. Lines indicate the average fitted response across five model runs, and shaded intervals indicate the minimum and maximum fitted response. (a) Hydric niche breadth, (b) Aquatic index, (c) Habitat breadth, (d) Site environment: principle component 1 (see methods for explanation), (e) Age at sexual maturity, (f) Clutch size, (g) Body size, (h) Site environment: principle component 2, (i) Thermal niche position, (j) Thermal niche breadth, (k) Hydric niche position, (l) Breeding system
Partial dependence plots illustrating the marginal effect (effect on risk, when all other predictors are averaged) of the top 12 predictors of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidisinfection prevalence, shown in order of variable importance (indicated by value in parenthesis for each predictor). Background histograms indicate the count distribution of each predictor across the 302 species or 95 sites. Lines indicate the average fitted response across five model runs, and shaded intervals indicate the minimum and maximum fitted response. (a) Hydric niche breadth, (b) Aquatic index, (c) Habitat breadth, (d) Site environment: principle component 1 (see methods for explanation), (e) Age at sexual maturity, (f) Clutch size, (g) Body size, (h) Site environment: principle component 2, (i) Thermal niche position, (j) Thermal niche breadth, (k) Hydric niche position, (l) Breeding systemConsidering life history, small‐bodied species (<20 mm SVL) had a slightly lower risk of infection (16%–17% vs. 18%–20%; Figure 3g), while those species with a rapid sexual maturation (<1 year) had a higher risk of infection (22%–26% vs. 17%–18%). Species with small clutches, fewer than 20 eggs per clutch (risk: 16.6%) and moderately large clutches (1,000–2,500 eggs; risk = 16%) had lower infection risk than their counterparts (17%–20%; Figure 3e).Aspects of the site‐level climate and species environmental niches influenced patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection. Across the 95 sites, amphibian assemblages experiencing warm, less seasonal temperatures (PC1; Figure 3d) and moderate precipitation (PC2; Figure 3h and k) had higher risk of infection compared to other environments. Amphibians that inhabit cooler thermal environments (~10–16°C) had higher risk of infection than species from warmer climates (18.8%–20.6% vs. 17.5%–18%; Figure 3i). Similar to rainfall, species from thermally variable environments also had higher rates of infection (19%–20.5% vs. 15%–17%; Figure 3j). The only behavioural trait that had a strong effect was breeding system: explosive breeders had a lower risk of B. dendrobatidis infection (14.2% vs. 20.6%; Figure 3l).Despite the moderate phylogenetic signal in B. dendrobatidis infection prevalence, factors describing taxonomic groupings contributed little to the trait‐dominated BRT models (Table S5). Species from the families Ranidae and Hyperoliidae had a slightly greater, and Bufonidae and Hylidae a slightly lower, risk of infection, although the weak influence of all taxonomic predictors (2.6%) indicates that the raw phylogenetic signal is largely capturing trait variation (Table S5).
Predictors of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection intensity
For the intensity of B. dendrobatidis infections (zoospore loads), there was a high degree of variation explained by a combination of traits and site environment (pseudo‐R
2 = 0.736, range = 0.731–0.741; Figure 4). Species life history appeared to play an important role in patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection intensity across infected amphibian assemblages. The most influential predictor of zoospore loads was species clutch size (Table S6), the intensity of infections was higher in highly fecund species and particularly for those with clutch sizes of over 3,000 eggs (Figure 4a). In contrast to patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection prevalence, large‐bodied amphibians in infected sites had lower infection intensities compared to small‐bodied species (<35 mm; Figure 4c). Age at sexual maturity was less important in terms of explaining differential infection intensity compared to infection prevalence among species, but those species maturing in 1.5–2.5 years had slightly higher zoospore loads (Figure 4h).
Figure 4
Partial dependence plots illustrating the marginal effect on infection intensity of the top 12 predictors, shown in order of variable importance (indicated by value in parenthesis for each predictor). Background histograms indicate the count distribution of each predictor across the 139 species or 34 sites. Lines indicate the average fitted response across five model runs, and shaded intervals indicate the minimum and maximum fitted response. (a) Clutch size, (b) Hydric niche position, (c) Body size, (d) Aquatic Index, (e) Thermal niche breadth, (f) Hydric niche breadth, (g) Site environment: principle component 1, (h) Thermal niche position, (i) Age at Sexual Maturity, (j) Habitat Breadth, (k) Site environment: principle component 2, (l) Adult habitat: Semi‐aquatic
Partial dependence plots illustrating the marginal effect on infection intensity of the top 12 predictors, shown in order of variable importance (indicated by value in parenthesis for each predictor). Background histograms indicate the count distribution of each predictor across the 139 species or 34 sites. Lines indicate the average fitted response across five model runs, and shaded intervals indicate the minimum and maximum fitted response. (a) Clutch size, (b) Hydric niche position, (c) Body size, (d) Aquatic Index, (e) Thermal niche breadth, (f) Hydric niche breadth, (g) Site environment: principle component 1, (h) Thermal niche position, (i) Age at Sexual Maturity, (j) Habitat Breadth, (k) Site environment: principle component 2, (l) Adult habitat: Semi‐aquaticAspects of species climatic niches were also consistently linked to B. dendrobatidis zoospore loads across amphibian assemblages. Rainfall across each species range was associated with infection intensity, where species that live in dry environments (<1,000 mm of precipitation annually) had lower zoospore loads within infected assemblages (Figure 4b). Thermal niche breadth and hydric niche breadth were both positively associated with infection intensity (Figure 4e, f), indicating that species occurring in highly variable environments, in terms of temperature and rainfall, typically had higher levels of infection. Infection intensity was also lower for species that occur in warmer environments (Figure 4i). Site‐level temperature (PC 1) and rainfall (PC2) also influenced infection levels, with higher infection intensity in warmer, less seasonal sites (Figure 4g) and for sites with high levels of precipitation (Figure 4k).With regard to habitat associations, species that had a greater association with aquatic habitats had higher B. dendrobatidis zoospore loads relative to more terrestrial species (Figure 4d), and species with semi‐aquatic adult habitats had an overall greater intensity of infection (Figure 4l). Similar to B. dendrobatidis infection risk, habitat specialists actually had a lower intensity of infections than their generalist counterparts (Figure 4j).Taxonomy and behavioural traits both contributed little to explaining patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection intensity in these models, with variable importance totalling 2.15% and 5.05%, respectively (Table S6).
Extinction patterns from chytridiomycosis epizootics
When we predicted the relative infection risk and intensity for species from sites experiencing chytridiomycosis epizootics in the Neotropics, we found that there was no clear link between predicted disease mitigation strategy and local extinction outcome (Figure 5). There was a trend for species predicted to be in the quadrant of high infection risk and low intensity, matching a “resistant” strategy, to be more likely to go extinct (Figure 5), but this pattern did not deviate significantly from our null expectation at α = 0.05 (Χ
= 7.08, df = 3, p = .069).
Figure 5
Predicted Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity for 153 populations of 122 species from five sites experiencing chytridiomycosis epizootics in the Neotropics. Blue points indicate populations that persisted through epizootics, while red points indicate populations that went locally extinct. Populations were assigned to a quadrant of the plot based on median risk and intensity to delineate tolerant, resistant, avoidant or resistant/avoidant strategies. There was no significant difference in the proportion of surviving populations across these quadrants (Χ
= 7.08, df = 3, p = .069)
Predicted Batrachochytrium dendrobatidisinfection risk and intensity for 153 populations of 122 species from five sites experiencing chytridiomycosis epizootics in the Neotropics. Blue points indicate populations that persisted through epizootics, while red points indicate populations that went locally extinct. Populations were assigned to a quadrant of the plot based on median risk and intensity to delineate tolerant, resistant, avoidant or resistant/avoidant strategies. There was no significant difference in the proportion of surviving populations across these quadrants (Χ
= 7.08, df = 3, p = .069)
DISCUSSION
Across a broad diversity of sites and species, we found consistent patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity both with evolutionary history and across a diverse set of species life history and ecological traits. Together with local environment, and accounting for exposure, these components can explain nearly half the variation in B. dendrobatidis prevalence (pseudo‐R
2 = 0.47) and over three quarters of the variation in B. dendrobatidis infection intensity (pseudo‐R
2 = 0.736). Using these global models to predict whether the amphibian species that persist through chytridiomycosis epizootics in the Neotropics exhibited tolerant, resistant or avoidance trait profiles, we found no clear patterns indicating that extinction risk differed across these inferred host disease strategies. This could indicate that the models are unable to accurately identify these different disease mitigation strategies, that these strategies are unrelated to extinction risk from chytridiomycosis epizootics or that other factors may ultimately be more important than these strategies in dictating population persistence during these events.The functional traits that influenced either risk or intensity of B. dendrobatidis infection were broadly consistent with prior studies that have focused on habitat, life history and geographic associations (Bancroft et al., 2011; Bielby et al., 2008; Lips et al., 2003; Murray & Skerratt, 2012), but importantly our results highlight the relative importance of these traits for explaining patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection. Species climatic niches, which may reflect differences in species physiology, typically had high variable importance in both B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity models. Species from highly seasonal environments, in terms of both rainfall and temperature, had both a higher risk of B. dendrobatidis infection and greater zoospore loads. This indicates that amphibians from highly seasonal environments may tend towards tolerance phenotypes, a strategy that may be beneficial to cope with high pathogen transmission during seasonal aggregations for breeding (Lenker, Savage, Becker, Rodriguez, & Zamudio, 2014). Thermal physiology has been linked with infection risk (Catenazzi et al., 2014; Nowakowski et al., 2016), but here we show that species water economy may also be key, as both precipitation seasonality and total rainfall were important for B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity. Species adapted to perennially dry environments may be able to avoid B. dendrobatidis zoospores by selecting drier environments (Zumbado‐Ulate, Bolaños, Gutiérrez‐Espeleta, & Puschendorf, 2014), or tolerance to desiccation may provide a means to reduce zoospore loads (Terrell, Engbrecht, Pessier, & Lannoo, 2014). This indicates that species thermal physiology and water economy may directly influence host resistance and tolerance to B. dendrobatidis, but challenge experiments with controlled laboratory exposures will be needed to clarify these relationships in a comparative framework (Gahl et al., 2012; Searle et al., 2011).Amphibian life history and habitat preferences were also important for both infection risk and intensity. Species with high productivity and rapid maturation had a greater risk of B. dendrobatidis infection, possibly due to trade‐offs between investment in growth and reproduction versus pathogen defence mechanisms (Han et al., 2015; Johnson et al., 2012). Certain life history traits, such as body size, were associated with a higher infection risk but a lower infection intensity indicating that large‐bodied species, such as bullfrogs (Eskew et al., 2015), may generally exhibit a higher resistance towards B. dendrobatidis infection. However, it is interesting to note that for the most part these same large‐bodied, and potentially resistant, species also appeared to be more likely to decline during epizootics in the Neotropics (Lips et al., 2003). This coincides with our result where species exhibiting a phenotype correlated with infection patterns consistent with resistance had the highest proportion of declining populations, and therefore, resistance may not lower extinction risk during epizootics. Habitat associations indicate that both B. dendrobatidis infection risk and intensity increase with both habitat generalism and a greater dependence on aquatic habitats (as inferred through the aquatic index), coincident with other studies indicating aquatic species are more susceptible to B. dendrobatidis (Bielby et al., 2008; Lips et al., 2003). Whether this indicates a tolerance phenotype for these aquatic, generalist species, or simply a much higher exposure to zoospores, needs additional investigation. These trait associations with B. dendrobatidis infection identified in our models have implications for managing amphibians in sites where B. dendrobatidis is endemic. In particular, species fitting a high B. dendrobatidis risk trait profile may be expected to experience heightened mortality and persistent fitness consequences (Chatfield et al., 2013; Pilliod et al., 2010). Similarly, these traits can potentially be used to identify species that pose a B. dendrobatidis biosecurity threat as targets for monitoring or control of human‐mediated transport (Kriger & Hero, 2009). In terms of identifying species susceptible to extinction from B. dendrobatidis epizootics, however, these traits appear unable to differentiate resilient and susceptible amphibian species.Despite the associations between species traits and patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection, we found no link between the traits our models identified as driving variation in B. dendrobatidis infections with the population persistence of amphibians in chytridiomycosis epizootics in the Neotropics. The heightened transmission of B. dendrobatidis infections during epizootic events (Briggs et al., 2010), or the exceptional virulence of introduced B. dendrobatidis strains (Piovia‐Scott et al., 2015), may mean that many of the avoidance traits influencing infection risk may simply become irrelevant under epizootic conditions because few species are able to escape infection. Even tolerant or resistant species likely have limits to infection intensity that may be exceeded under epizootic conditions (Bielby, Fisher, Clare, Rosa, & Garner, 2015; Briggs et al., 2010), leading to subsequent decline. Indeed, our results suggest that resistant phenotype species may be the most at risk of extinction during epizootic events, and this may be due to the fitness costs of resisting infection when pathogen encounter rates are high. However, as these disease mitigation strategies can be achieved through multiple mechanisms (i.e., antimicrobial peptides, microbiome, immune systems), it is possible that species exhibiting these different mechanisms have alternative risks of decline during epizootics. We may be obscuring these fine‐scale mechanistic differences by grouping together species that achieve tolerance or resistance through various pathways, and therefore comparing the response to B. dendrobatidis of resistant and tolerant species that invoke different underlying mechanisms would be an important future study. If species biology is unrelated to epizootic extinction risk, we would expect random patterns of extinction with respect to evolutionary history. However, an additional analysis of our testing data set indicates a moderately high phylogenetic signal in extinction (Pagel's λ = 0.52; see Appendix A), implying that host evolutionary history in these sites partly influences species survival during epizootics. This suggests that a different set of traits, perhaps relating to aspects of population dynamics rather than disease susceptibility (Tobler, Borgula, & Schmidt, 2012), may determine the ultimate population‐level consequences of chytridiomycosis. Similarly, the postepizootic time frame may matter: species that differ in disease mitigation strategies could have differential time frames for population recovery and recolonization of enzootic sites (Knapp et al., 2016; Scheele et al., 2014). Identifying the traits that underlie persistence, and whether different disease strategies (tolerance, resistance, avoidance and their mechanisms) have different levels of extinction risk during epizootics, will be key to clarifying the mechanisms leading to decline from B. dendrobatidis outbreaks.If species traits influence the risk and intensity of B. dendrobatidis infections under endemic conditions, but ultimately do not predict susceptibility to local extinction during epizootic events, how then do we proceed to prioritize amphibians for proactive management? There have been several interesting patterns that have emerged since amphibian assemblages were first devastated by epizootic events. There is evidence that a response to selection towards B. dendrobatidis tolerance and resistance is occurring in wild amphibian populations (Savage & Zamudio, 2011, 2016) and that acquired immunity from previous exposure to the pathogen can enhance survival (McMahon et al., 2014). Second, there is evidence that pathogenicity of virulent B. dendrobatidis strains can potentially decline over time (Refsnider, Poorten, Langhammer, Burrowes, & Rosenblum, 2015), suggesting that both hosts and pathogens may eventually attain some level of equilibrium. Finally, these two points are strengthened by cases where amphibian species previously devastated by chytridiomycosis are recolonizing sites where B. dendrobatidis is still endemic (Knapp et al., 2016; Sapsford, Voordouw, Alford, & Schwarzkopf, 2015; Scheele et al., 2014). Together, these lines of evidence suggest that while B. dendrobatidis susceptibility is important, other mechanisms may be just as important for ultimately determining species fates in environments where B. dendrobatidis is introduced.If we consider how management could best prepare for B. dendrobatidis epizootics, all this suggests we might do well to focus on identifying species that are restricted to environments and habitats with high B. dendrobatidis exposure and may not be able to escape initial introductions of virulent B. dendrobatidis strains (Murray & Skerratt, 2012). Species with at least some populations located in sites with low potential for B. dendrobatidis colonization are more likely to be buffered from global extinction (Puschendorf et al., 2011; Zumbado‐Ulate et al., 2014). Therefore, it may be more effective to shift focus away from species‐level susceptibility and instead towards the overall risk of B. dendrobatidis introduction to amphibian assemblages, ensuring that species in at‐risk sites have potential disease refugia within their distribution and in turn the ability to adapt and recolonize over time.Confronting the modern biodiversity crisis requires innovative tools to inform efficient management decisions. Although both traits and evolutionary history underlie patterns of B. dendrobatidis infection in amphibians, these traits may have limited potential to predict which species will be lost during future chytridiomycosis epizootics at local and regional scales. The lack of association between predicted disease strategy and epizootic extinction risk clarifies that a different approach from identifying and focusing efforts on susceptible species may be warranted to prevent global extinctions from B. dendrobatidis introductions. Conservation efforts may be most efficient by focusing on species that entirely overlap with environments that favour B. dendrobatidis introduction (Murray & Skerratt, 2012; Puschendorf et al., 2011); for other species, we may simply expect that although significant population losses will likely occur, eventually both pathogen and host may be able to achieve coexistence.
DATA ACCESSIBILITY
The full data sets including disease and trait data analysed for this study are archived in the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.t54h6Click here for additional data file.
Authors: A Martel; M Blooi; C Adriaensen; P Van Rooij; W Beukema; M C Fisher; R A Farrer; B R Schmidt; U Tobler; K Goka; K R Lips; C Muletz; K R Zamudio; J Bosch; S Lötters; E Wombwell; T W J Garner; A A Cunningham; A Spitzen-van der Sluijs; S Salvidio; R Ducatelle; K Nishikawa; T T Nguyen; J E Kolby; I Van Bocxlaer; F Bossuyt; F Pasmans Journal: Science Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Vojtech Baláž; Judit Vörös; Petr Civiš; Jiri Vojar; Attila Hettyey; Endre Sós; Róbert Dankovics; Robert Jehle; Ditte G Christiansen; Frances Clare; Matthew C Fisher; Trenton W J Garner; Jon Bielby Journal: Conserv Biol Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 6.560
Authors: Jonathan E Kolby; Kristine M Smith; Sara D Ramirez; Falitiana Rabemananjara; Allan P Pessier; Jesse L Brunner; Caren S Goldberg; Lee Berger; Lee F Skerratt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: C Guilherme Becker; Molly C Bletz; Sasha E Greenspan; David Rodriguez; Carolina Lambertini; Thomas S Jenkinson; Paulo R Guimarães; Ana Paula A Assis; Robert Geffers; Michael Jarek; Luís Felipe Toledo; Miguel Vences; Célio F B Haddad Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 5.349