Shigeru Takagi1, Takashi Sato2, Satoshi Watanabe2, Osamu Tanifuji3, Tomoharu Mochizuki3, Go Omori4, Naoto Endo3. 1. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, 1-754 Asahimachidori Cuo-ku, Niigata, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan. m01a045c-shigeru@hotmail.co.jp. 2. Niigata Medical Center, Niigata, Japan. 3. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, 1-754 Asahimachidori Cuo-ku, Niigata, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan. 4. Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Abnormalities of lower extremity alignment (LEA) in recurrent patella dislocation (RPD) have been studied mostly by two-dimensional (2D) procedures leaving three-dimensional (3D) factors unknown. This study aimed to three-dimensionally examine risk factors for RPD in lower extremity alignment under the weight-bearing conditions. METHODS: The alignment of 21 limbs in 15 RPD subjects was compared to the alignment of 24 limbs of 12 healthy young control subjects by an our previously reported 2D-3D image-matching technique. The sagittal, coronal, and transverse alignment in full extension as well as the torsional position of the femur (anteversion) and tibia (tibial torsion) under weight-bearing standing conditions were assessed by our previously reported 3D technique. The correlations between lower extremity alignment and RPD were assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis. The difference of lower extremity alignment in RPD between under the weight-bearing conditions and under the non-weight-bearing conditions was assessed. RESULTS: In the sagittal and coronal planes, there was no relationship (statistically or by clinically important difference) between lower extremity alignment angle and RPD. However, in the transverse plane, increased external tibial rotation [odds ratio (OR) 1.819; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.282-2.581], increased femoral anteversion (OR 1.183; 95% CI 1.029-1.360), and increased external tibial torsion (OR 0.880; 95% CI 0.782-0.991) were all correlated with RPD. The tibia was more rotated relative to femur at the knee joint in the RPD group under the weight-bearing conditions compared to under the non-weight-bearing conditions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that during weight-bearing, alignment parameters in the transverse plane related to the risk of RPD, while in the sagittal and coronal plane alignment parameters did not correlate with RPD. The clinical importance of this study is that the 3D measurements more directly, precisely, and sensitively detect rotational parameters associated with RPD and hence predict risk of RPD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: Abnormalities of lower extremity alignment (LEA) in recurrent patella dislocation (RPD) have been studied mostly by two-dimensional (2D) procedures leaving three-dimensional (3D) factors unknown. This study aimed to three-dimensionally examine risk factors for RPD in lower extremity alignment under the weight-bearing conditions. METHODS: The alignment of 21 limbs in 15 RPD subjects was compared to the alignment of 24 limbs of 12 healthy young control subjects by an our previously reported 2D-3D image-matching technique. The sagittal, coronal, and transverse alignment in full extension as well as the torsional position of the femur (anteversion) and tibia (tibial torsion) under weight-bearing standing conditions were assessed by our previously reported 3D technique. The correlations between lower extremity alignment and RPD were assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis. The difference of lower extremity alignment in RPD between under the weight-bearing conditions and under the non-weight-bearing conditions was assessed. RESULTS: In the sagittal and coronal planes, there was no relationship (statistically or by clinically important difference) between lower extremity alignment angle and RPD. However, in the transverse plane, increased external tibial rotation [odds ratio (OR) 1.819; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.282-2.581], increased femoral anteversion (OR 1.183; 95% CI 1.029-1.360), and increased external tibial torsion (OR 0.880; 95% CI 0.782-0.991) were all correlated with RPD. The tibia was more rotated relative to femur at the knee joint in the RPD group under the weight-bearing conditions compared to under the non-weight-bearing conditions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that during weight-bearing, alignment parameters in the transverse plane related to the risk of RPD, while in the sagittal and coronal plane alignment parameters did not correlate with RPD. The clinical importance of this study is that the 3D measurements more directly, precisely, and sensitively detect rotational parameters associated with RPD and hence predict risk of RPD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Daniel E Redziniak; David R Diduch; William M Mihalko; John P Fulkerson; Wendy M Novicoff; Shahin Sheibani-Rad; Khaled J Saleh Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Donald G Eckhoff; David J Jacofsky; Bryan D Springer; Michael Dunbar; Jeffrey J Cherian; Randa K Elmallah; Michael A Mont; Kenneth A Greene Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: P Kaiser; F Loth; R Attal; M Kummann; P Schuster; F Riechelmann; M Schlumberger Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Alex E White; Peters T Otlans; Dylan P Horan; Daniel B Calem; William D Emper; Kevin B Freedman; Fotios P Tjoumakaris Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-05-20