| Literature DB >> 29150421 |
Thierry Facon1, Meletios A Dimopoulos2, Angela Dispenzieri3, John V Catalano4, Andrew Belch5, Michele Cavo6, Antonello Pinto7, Katja Weisel8, Heinz Ludwig9, Nizar J Bahlis10, Anne Banos11, Mourad Tiab12, Michel Delforge13, Jamie D Cavenagh14, Catarina Geraldes15, Je-Jung Lee16, Christine Chen17, Albert Oriol18, Javier De La Rubia19, Darrell White20, Daniel Binder21, Jin Lu22, Kenneth C Anderson23, Philippe Moreau24, Michel Attal25, Aurore Perrot26, Bertrand Arnulf27, Lugui Qiu28, Murielle Roussel29, Eileen Boyle1, Salomon Manier1, Mohamad Mohty30, Herve Avet-Loiseau31, Xavier Leleu32, Annette Ervin-Haynes33, Guang Chen33, Vanessa Houck33, Lotfi Benboubker34, Cyrille Hulin35.
Abstract
This FIRST trial final analysis examined survival outcomes in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) treated with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone until disease progression (Rd continuous), Rd for 72 weeks (18 cycles; Rd18), or melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT; 72 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; primary comparison: Rd continuous vs MPT). Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary endpoint (final analysis prespecified ≥60 months' follow-up). Patients were randomized to Rd continuous (n = 535), Rd18 (n = 541), or MPT (n = 547). At a median follow-up of 67 months, PFS was significantly longer with Rd continuous vs MPT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.79; P < .00001) and was similarly extended vs Rd18. Median OS was 10 months longer with Rd continuous vs MPT (59.1 vs 49.1 months; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.92; P = .0023), and similar with Rd18 (62.3 months). In patients achieving complete or very good partial responses, Rd continuous had an ≈30-month longer median time to next treatment vs Rd18 (69.5 vs 39.9 months). Over half of all patients who received second-line treatment were given a bortezomib-based therapy. Second-line outcomes were improved in patients receiving bortezomib after Rd continuous and Rd18 vs after MPT. No new safety concerns, including risk for secondary malignancies, were observed. Treatment with Rd continuous significantly improved survival outcomes vs MPT, supporting Rd continuous as a standard of care for patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00689936 and EudraCT as 2007-004823-39.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29150421 PMCID: PMC5774211 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-795047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113