Literature DB >> 29150011

Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for loss-of-function in the early chick embryo.

Shashank Gandhi1, Michael L Piacentino1, Felipe M Vieceli1, Marianne E Bronner2.   

Abstract

The advent of CRISPR/Cas9 has made genome editing possible in virtually any organism, including those not previously amenable to genetic manipulations. Here, we present an optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 for application to early avian embryos with improved efficiency via a three-fold strategy. First, we employed Cas9 protein flanked with two nuclear localization signal sequences for improved nuclear localization. Second, we used a modified guide RNA (gRNA) scaffold that obviates premature termination of transcription and unstable Cas9-gRNA interactions. Third, we used a chick-specific U6 promoter that yields 4-fold higher gRNA expression than the previously utilized human U6. For rapid screening of gRNAs for in vivo applications, we also generated a chicken fibroblast cell line that constitutively expresses Cas9. As proof of principle, we performed electroporation-based loss-of-function studies in the early chick embryo to knock out Pax7 and Sox10, key transcription factors with known functions in neural crest development. The results show that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion causes loss of their respective proteins and transcripts, as well as predicted downstream targets. Taken together, the results reveal the utility of this optimized CRISPR/Cas9 method for targeted gene knockout in chicken embryos in a manner that is reproducible, robust and specific.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; Chick embryos; Knockout; Neural crest; gRNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29150011      PMCID: PMC5728388          DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  60 in total

1.  The chick embryo as a model system for analyzing mechanisms of development.

Authors:  D K Darnell; G C Schoenwolf
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Controlling morpholino experiments: don't stop making antisense.

Authors:  Judith S Eisen; James C Smith
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Usage of putative chicken U6 promoters for vector-based RNA interference.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kudo; Shizuyo Sutou
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 4.  In situ hybridization analysis of chick embryos in whole-mount and tissue sections.

Authors:  Hervé Acloque; David G Wilkinson; M Angela Nieto
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.441

5.  Out with the old, in with the new: reassessing morpholino knockdowns in light of genome editing technology.

Authors:  Stefan Schulte-Merker; Didier Y R Stainier
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo.

Authors:  V HAMBURGER; H L HAMILTON
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 1.804

7.  Stable integration and conditional expression of electroporated transgenes in chicken embryos.

Authors:  Yuki Sato; Toshiharu Kasai; Shinichi Nakagawa; Koji Tanabe; Tadayoshi Watanabe; Koichi Kawakami; Yoshiko Takahashi
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases.

Authors:  Shengdar Q Tsai; Zongli Zheng; Nhu T Nguyen; Matthew Liebers; Ved V Topkar; Vishal Thapar; Nicolas Wyvekens; Cyd Khayter; A John Iafrate; Long P Le; Martin J Aryee; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Efficient Genome Editing in Chicken DF-1 Cells Using the CRISPR/Cas9 System.

Authors:  Yichun Bai; Linjie He; Pengcheng Li; Kun Xu; Simin Shao; Chonghua Ren; Zhongtian Liu; Zehui Wei; Zhiying Zhang
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system.

Authors:  Baohui Chen; Luke A Gilbert; Beth A Cimini; Joerg Schnitzbauer; Wei Zhang; Gene-Wei Li; Jason Park; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Jonathan S Weissman; Lei S Qi; Bo Huang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  28 in total

1.  Reprogramming Axial Level Identity to Rescue Neural-Crest-Related Congenital Heart Defects.

Authors:  Shashank Gandhi; Max Ezin; Marianne E Bronner
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  Multiplex clonal analysis in the chick embryo using retrovirally-mediated combinatorial labeling.

Authors:  Weiyi Tang; Yuwei Li; Shashank Gandhi; Marianne E Bronner
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  Transcriptome profiling of the cardiac neural crest reveals a critical role for MafB.

Authors:  Saori Tani-Matsuhana; Felipe Monteleone Vieceli; Shashank Gandhi; Kunio Inoue; Marianne E Bronner
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 4.  Embryonic Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) as a Model of Cardiac Biology and Development.

Authors:  José G Vilches-Moure
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 5.  In Ovo Gain- and Loss-of-Function Approaches to Study Gut Morphogenesis.

Authors:  Bhargav D Sanketi; Natasza A Kurpios
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 6.  MAPK and PI3K signaling: At the crossroads of neural crest development.

Authors:  Colin J Dinsmore; Philippe Soriano
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 7.  Cut loose and run: The complex role of ADAM proteases during neural crest cell development.

Authors:  Dominique Alfandari; Lisa A Taneyhill
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 2.487

8.  Leukocyte receptor tyrosine kinase interacts with secreted midkine to promote survival of migrating neural crest cells.

Authors:  Felipe Monteleone Vieceli; Marianne E Bronner
Journal:  Development       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  The connectome of neural crest enhancers reveals regulatory features of signaling systems.

Authors:  Ana Paula Azambuja; Marcos Simoes-Costa
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 12.270

10.  Genome and epigenome engineering CRISPR toolkit for in vivo modulation of cis-regulatory interactions and gene expression in the chicken embryo.

Authors:  Ruth M Williams; Upeka Senanayake; Mara Artibani; Gunes Taylor; Daniel Wells; Ahmed Ashour Ahmed; Tatjana Sauka-Spengler
Journal:  Development       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.