| Literature DB >> 29146975 |
Wei-Wei Li1,2, Jin-Jun Shan1,2, Li-Li Lin1,2, Tong Xie1,2, Li-Li He3, Yan Yang4, Shou-Chuan Wang5.
Abstract
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection in infants is a global problem and the liver is a target organ of HCMV invasion. However, the mechanism by which HCMV causes different types of liver injury is unclear, and there are many difficulties in the differential diagnosis of HCMV infantile cholestatic hepatopathy (ICH) and extrahepatic biliary atresia (EHBA). We established a non-targeted gas chromatography-mass spectrometry metabolomics method in conjunction with orthogonal partial least squares-discriminate analysis based on 127 plasma samples from healthy controls, and patients with HCMV infantile hepatitis, HCMV ICH, and HCMV EHBA to explore the metabolite profile of different types of HCMV-induced liver injury. Twenty-nine metabolites related to multiple amino acid metabolism disorder, nitrogen metabolism and energy metabolism were identified. Carbamic acid, glutamate, L-aspartic acid, L-homoserine, and noradrenaline for HCMV ICH vs. HCMV EHBA were screened as potential biomarkers and showed excellent discriminant performance. These results not only revealed the potential pathogenesis of HCMV-induced liver injury, but also provided a feasible diagnostic tool for distinguishing EHBA from ICH.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29146975 PMCID: PMC5691185 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16051-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics in three HCMV induced liver injury sub groups of the study. Values are given as mean ± SD or number of individuals (%). aP value of chi-square test. bP value of Kruskal–Wallis test. cP value of Dunn’s post hoc test.
| Variables | HCMV IH | HCMV ICH | HCMV EHBA | P valuea | IH | IH | ICH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 22) | (n = 39) | (n = 26) | |||||
| Gender(female,%) | 5(22.7%) | 10(25.6%) | 10(38.5%) | 0.412466 | |||
| GCV use,% | 12(54.5%) | 27(69.2%) | 8(30.8%) | 0.00959 | |||
| P valueb | |||||||
| Age,month | 3.29 ± 1.69 | 2.38 ± 0.94 | 3.29 ± 2.03 | 0.024297 | 0.017954 | 0.611361 | 0.034049 |
| BMI | 17.83 ± 2.68 | 15.46 ± 2.70 | 16.33 ± 3.59 | 0.019104 | 0.014970 | 0.144924 | 0.312676 |
| ALT,U/L | 142.45 ± 133.92 | 175.66 ± 145.62 | 197.45 ± 156.12 | 0.176783 | 0.241394 | 0.054314 | 0.441319 |
| AST,U/L | 112.78 ± 100.91 | 246.68 ± 267.23 | 278.84 ± 150.89 | 0.000030 | 0.001060 | 0.000013 | 0.059016 |
| TBIL,umol/L | 11.16 ± 7.31 | 133.66 ± 85.87 | 162.42 ± 71.43 | 6.18E-12 | 1.17E-10 | 3.26E-09 | 0.023635 |
| DBIL,umol/L | 3.14 ± 2.57 | 81.37 ± 65.19 | 104.51 ± 48.10 | 2.49E-12 | 1.17E-10 | 3.26E-09 | 0.003823 |
| TBA,umol/L | 23.95 ± 30.85 | 102.20 ± 85.02 | 124.02 ± 52.82 | 3.69E-09 | 8.23E-08 | 1.39E-07 | 0.027206 |
| GGT,U/L | 110.54 ± 77.58 | 199.16 ± 221.16 | 363.48 ± 458.25 | 0.026581 | 0.028307 | 0.01968 | 0.252247 |
| ALP,U/L | 291.59 ± 132.70 | 595.58 ± 289.98 | 514.46 ± 250.45 | 0.000002 | 3.82E-07 | 0.000344 | 0.311748 |
| ALB,g/L | 37.27 ± 4.49 | 35.40 ± 5.40 | 36.98 ± 5.62 | 0.311954 | 0.326273 | 0.943610 | 0.138464 |
| LDH,U/L | 335.19 ± 75.96 | 401.61 ± 120.26 | 432.04 ± 352.01 | 0.094866 | 0.021247 | 0.360049 | 0.391435 |
| PT,S | 10.28 ± 0.96 | 11.89 ± 3.59 | 12.18 ± 3.29 | 0.010994 | 0.057359 | 0.002440 | 0.179165 |
| WBC,109/L | 11.79 ± 6.01 | 11.92 ± 3.95 | 15.46 ± 12.34 | 0.427630 | 0.372848 | 0.220980 | 0.513357 |
| NH3,umol/L | 64.58 ± 17.18 | 82.74 ± 48.21 | 76.58 ± 40.84 | 0.100737 | 0.052500 | 0.493167 | 0.132249 |
Figure 1Differential metabolites and pathways related to HCMV induced liver injury. (a), PCA 3D Score plots of the HCMV IH group, HCMV ICH group, HCMV EHBA group and NC. (b), OPLS-DA 3D Score plots of the four groups. (c), Venn diagram of the differential metabolites in different HCMV induced liver injury groups compared with the NC. (d), the summary of aberrant pathways in HCMV induced liver injury, as analyzed by MetaboAnalyst 3.0.
Figure 2The summary of aberrant pathways in HCMV induced liver injury, as analyzed by MetaboAnalyst 3.0.
Figure 3Boxplots showing up-regulated and down-regulated metabolites that could be used to differentiate HCMV ICH for HCMV EHBA.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 4Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve model of clinical indicators and metabolites to discriminate HCMV IH, HCMV ICH from HCMV EHBA.
Figure 5A simple diagram to illustrate the metabolites disturbance in HCMV induced liver injury infants. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.