Literature DB >> 29146829

Is bridging therapy still required in stroke due to carotid artery terminus occlusions?

Chrysanthi Papagiannaki1, Hubert Desal2, Romain Bourcier2, Pierre-Louis Alexandre2, François Eugène3, Béatrice Delasalle-Guyomarch4, Benoit Guillon5, Basile Kerleroux6, Suzana Saleme7, Gaultier Marnat8, Samy Boucebci9, Mahmood Mirza10, Jean-Christophe Ferré3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Studies comparing endovascular stroke treatment using mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with or without prior IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPa) have included only 30% of internal carotid artery terminus occlusions (ICA-O), a known predictor of recanalization failure with IV tPa.
OBJECTIVE: To carry out a retrospective multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients to investigate the impact of intravenous thrombolysis on ICA-O by comparing patients treated with MT alone or bridging therapy (BT).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with ICA-O treated with MT alone or BT were retrospectively examined and compared. Demographic data, vascular risk factors, treatment modalities, complications, technical and clinical outcomes were recorded. A propensity score (PS) analysis was used to compare modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) between groups.
RESULTS: 141 consecutive patients (60% BT/40% MT) were included between January 2014 and June 2016. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3, distal emboli, and median number of passes between the groups. There was a significant difference between BT and MT groups in the median time between imaging and groin puncture (median 97 min vs 75, p=0.007), the rate of ICH (44% vs 27%, p=0.05), but not for symptomatic ICH (18% vs 13%, p=0.49). With PS, there was a trend towards a higher rate of ICH (OR=2.3, 95% CI 0.9 to 5.9, p=0.09) in the BT group compared with the MT alone group, with no difference in mRS score ≤2 at 3 months (OR=1.6, 95% CI 0.7 to 3.7, p=0.29).
CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between patients receiving bridging therapy versus direct thrombectomy. Bridging therapy delayed time to groin puncture and increased ICH rate. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  stroke; thrombectomy; thrombolysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29146829     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  7 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy with pre-intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lu Fan; Lin Zang; Xiaodong Liu; Jian Wang; Jianting Qiu; Yujie Wang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion; should we cross that bridge? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 36,123 patients.

Authors:  Hazem S Ghaith; Mohamed Elfil; Mohamed Diaa Gabra; Asmaa Ahmed Nawar; Mohamed Sameh Abd-Alkhaleq; Khaled M Hamam; Lara Ebrahim Aboelnasr; Esraa Ayman Elgezery; Mohamed Hosny Osman; Hanaa Elsayed; Sarya Swed; Ulrick Sidney Kanmounye; Ahmed Negida
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.830

3.  Direct Thrombectomy versus Bridging for Patients with Emergent Large-Vessel Occlusions.

Authors:  Ronen R Leker; Jose E Cohen; David Tanne; David Orion; Gregory Telman; Guy Raphaeli; Jacob Amsalem; Jonathan Y Streifler; Hen Hallevi; Pavel Gavriliuc; Natan M Bornstein; Anat Horev; Nour Eddine Yaghmour
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2018-07-04

4.  Clinical and Neuroimaging Outcomes of Direct Thrombectomy vs Bridging Therapy in Large Vessel Occlusion: Analysis of the SELECT Cohort Study.

Authors:  Amrou Sarraj; James Grotta; Gregory W Albers; Ameer E Hassan; Spiros Blackburn; Arthur Day; Clark Sitton; Michael Abraham; Chunyan Cai; Mark Dannenbaum; Deep Pujara; William Hicks; Ronald Budzik; Nirav Vora; Ashish Arora; Bader Alenzi; Wondwossen G Tekle; Haris Kamal; Osman Mir; Andrew D Barreto; Maarten Lansberg; Rishi Gupta; Sheryl Martin-Schild; Sean Savitz; Georgios Tsivgoulis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 11.800

5.  Does Intravenous Thrombolysis Influence the Time of Recanalization and Success of Mechanical Thrombectomy during the Acute Phase of Cerebral Infarction?

Authors:  Guillaume Charbonnier; Louise Bonnet; Benjamin Bouamra; Fabrice Vuillier; Giovanni Vitale; Thierry Moulin; Elisabeth Medeiros De Bustos; Alessandra Biondi
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis Extra       Date:  2020-04-28

6.  Endovascular Recanalization for Acute Internal Carotid Artery Terminus Occlusion: A Subgroup Analysis From the Direct-MT Trial.

Authors:  Yingying Zhang; Lei Zhang; Yongwei Zhang; Zifu Li; Yongxin Zhang; Pengfei Xing; Wenhuo Chen; Shouchun Wang; Tianxiao Li; Pengfei Yang; Jianmin Liu
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Association of Time From Stroke Onset to Groin Puncture With Quality of Reperfusion After Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data From 7 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Romain Bourcier; Mayank Goyal; David S Liebeskind; Keith W Muir; Hubert Desal; Adnan H Siddiqui; Diederik W J Dippel; Charles B Majoie; Wim H van Zwam; Tudor G Jovin; Elad I Levy; Peter J Mitchell; Olvert A Berkhemer; Stephen M Davis; Imad Derraz; Geoffrey A Donnan; Andrew M Demchuk; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Michael Kelly; Yvo B Roos; Reza Jahan; Aad van der Lugt; Marieke Sprengers; Stephane Velasco; Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt; Wagih Ben Hassen; Paul Burns; Scott Brown; Emmanuel Chabert; Timo Krings; Hana Choe; Christian Weimar; Bruce C V Campbell; Gary A Ford; Marc Ribo; Phil White; Geoffrey C Cloud; Luis San Roman; Antoni Davalos; Olivier Naggara; Michael D Hill; Serge Bracard
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 18.302

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.