Literature DB >> 29146161

Intraoperative Workflow for All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of Preconditioning and Knot Tying.

Edoardo Monaco1, Samuel Bachmaier2, Mattia Fabbri1, Riccardo Maria Lanzetti3, Coen A Wijdicks2, Andrea Ferretti1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the effect of preconditioning according to intraoperative workflow on the elongation behavior of single-side and fully knotted all-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction configurations in a biomechanical in vitro study.
METHODS: Four full construct all-inside ACL reconstruction groups (n = 8 per group) were tested using porcine tibias and bovine tendons. Groups included both an all-inside configuration with one- (group 1) and both-side knotted adjustable loop-length devices (group 2), without and with performing intraoperative preconditioning (group 1-intraoperative preconditioned [IPC], group 2-IPC). Adjustable loop-length devices for control groups were knotted according to test configurations. Intraoperative preconditioning specimens were further precycled for 10 times at 0.5 Hz and manually retensioned before knotting. All groups underwent dynamic cycling in position and force control mode each for 1,000 cycles at 0.75 Hz according to in vitro loading parameters replicating the in vivo ACL environment. Finally, a load-to-failure test at 50 mm/min was performed.
RESULTS: Intraoperative preconditioning increases initial graft tension for single- (242 ± 22 N vs 174 ± 13 N; P < .0001) and both-side knotted configurations (225 ± 15 N vs 159 ± 10 N; P < .0001) compared with controls and allows maintained graft tension at higher levels until reaching the end of position-controlled cyclic loading. Furthermore, dynamic elongation is reduced for one- (1.93 ± 0.28 vs 0.76 ± 0.12; P < .0001) and both-side knotted (1.84 ± 0.20 vs 0.96 ± 0.32; P < .0001) configurations by 61% and 47%, respectively. No intergroup (group 1 vs group 2 and group 1-IPC vs group 2-IPC) statistically significant differences could be found between one- and both-side knotted configurations.
CONCLUSIONS: All-inside ACL reconstruction with preconditioning according to intraoperative workflow leads to a statistically significant improved mechanical behavior and may allow for optimizing initial graft tension and elongation for all-inside ACL reconstruction to reduce knee laxity. A single-side knotted configuration achieves similar stabilization strength to fully knotted constructs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Graft insertion until tunnel docking increases the intratunnel graft portion that may optimize graft incorporation. Eliminating a suture knot stack may improve intraoperative workflow and reduce postoperative knot irritation.
Copyright © 2017 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29146161     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  7 in total

1.  Flexion deformity and laxity as a function of knee position at the time of tensioning of rigid anatomic hamstring ACL grafts.

Authors:  Peter J C McEwen; Milford McArthur; Sarah G Brereton; William B O'Callaghan; Matthew P R Wilkinson
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2020-10-07

2.  Adjustable- Versus Fixed-Loop Devices for Femoral Fixation in ACL Reconstruction: An In Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Study of Surgical Technique-Based Tibial Fixation and Graft Preparation.

Authors:  Patrick A Smith; Marina Piepenbrink; Shelby K Smith; Samuel Bachmaier; Asheesh Bedi; Coen A Wijdicks
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-04-24

3.  All-Inside Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction via the Transtibial Approach With a Laser-Tip Guide System for Drilling.

Authors:  Toshiaki Takahashi; Seiji Watanabe; Hiromasa Miura
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-07-17

4.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With the All-Inside Technique: Equivalent Outcomes and Failure Rate at Three-Year Follow-Up Compared to a Doubled Semitendinosus-Gracilis Graft.

Authors:  George Kyriakopoulos; Spyros Manthas; Maria Vlachou; Leon Oikonomou; Stamatios A Papadakis; Konstantinos Kateros
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-18

5.  Comparison Between Early and Late Retensioning of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device During Hamstring ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Nam-Hong Choi; Bong-Seok Yang; Hang-Ki Kang; Kyu-Wan Kim; Han-Bit Kim; Brian N Victoroff
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-14

6.  Treatment of Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears-Part 2: The Role of Internal Bracing on Gap Formation and Stabilization of Repair Techniques.

Authors:  Samuel Bachmaier; Gregory S DiFelice; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Wiemi A Douoguih; Patrick A Smith; Lee J Pace; Daniel Ritter; Coen A Wijdicks
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-28

Review 7.  Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rohan Bhimani; Reza Shahriarirad; Keivan Ranjbar; Amirhossein Erfani; Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.