| Literature DB >> 29145853 |
Kevin M Raible1,2, Bhaswati Sen1,2, Nancy Law1, Tiffany E Bias1, Christopher L Emery1,3, Garth D Ehrlich1,2,4,5,6, Suresh G Joshi7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acinetobacter baumannii is a nosocomial pathogen which is establishing as a major cause of morbidity and mortality within the healthcare community. The success of this pathogen is largely due to its ability to rapidly gain resistance to antimicrobial therapies and its capability to persist in an abiotic environment through the production of a biofilm. Our tertiary-care hospital has showed high incidence of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) isolates.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; Biofilm; CRAB; Carbapenem resistance; Colonization; Integrase; Integron cassette; MLST; Multilocus sequence typing; Multiple drug resistance; OXA-23; OXA-40; OXA-51; Plasmid; β-lactamase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29145853 PMCID: PMC5691885 DOI: 10.1186/s12941-017-0248-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ISSN: 1476-0711 Impact factor: 3.944
Demographics of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii positive patients
| Features | 2010–2011 isolates | 2015 isolates |
|---|---|---|
| Number of isolates | 16 | 10 |
| Average age of patient (yr) | 47.8 ± 19.1 | 55.6 ± 15.1 |
| Male (%) | 62 | 50 |
| ICU patients (%) | 37 | 50 |
| Nosocomial infections (%) | 37 | 60 |
Antibiogram showing percent resistant isolates of different isolate groups (old and new, clinical source, and clonal lineage) against tested antimicrobial agents
| Ampicillin/sulbact (%) | Imipinem (%) | Meropenem (%) | Amikacin (%) | Levofloxacin (%) | Gentamicin (%) | Cefepime (%) | Tobramicin (%) | Trimeth-Sulfametho (%) | Piperacilin (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Old (n = 16) | 68 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 93 | 93 | 88 | 93 | 93 |
| New (n = 10) | 40 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 100 | 10 | 90 | 100 |
| Urine (n = 3) | 66 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Sp (n = 10) | 90 | 100 | 100 | 70 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 90 | 100 |
| Blood (n = 3) | 66 | 100 | 100 | 66 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 100 | 100 |
| Tx/Wound (n = 10) | 40 | 100 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 50 | 90 | 40 | 90 | 90 |
| #229 (n = 12) | 75 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 92 | 100 | 83 | 83 | 92 |
| #2 (n = 14) | 57 | 100 | 100 | 85 | 100 | 71 | 92 | 28 | 100 | 100 |
The antimicrobial agents included were ampicillin/sulbactam, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, cefepime, tobramycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and piperacillin
PCR results for 26 CRAB isolates
| Isolate | Source | MIC | MLST Type | TEM | SHV | PER | KPC | VEB | CTX | MBL | EDTA DDS | ADC-7 | ISaba1 + ADC-7 | ampC | ISaba1 + ampC | OXA-23 | OXA-24 | OXA-40 | OXA-51 | ISaba1 + OXA-51 | OXA-58 | ICA1 | int123 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | Sp | 16 | 229 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 25 | Sp | 16 | 229 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 28 | T | 8 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | + |
| 32 | U | 32 | 229 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 39 | Sp | 16 | 229 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 42 | T | 16 | 229 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 51 | T | 16 | 229 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 52 | U | 16 | 229 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 56 | U | 32 | 229 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 57 | U | 8 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | + |
| 58 | T | > 256 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – |
| 61 | U | 16 | 229 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 62 | Sp | 16 | 229 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 64 | T | 32 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | – | – |
| 65 | B | 16 | 2 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 68 | Sp | 8 | 229 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | + |
| 220 | T | 32 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | – | + |
| 222 | B | 64 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | – | + |
| 223 | Sp | 32 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 224 | T | 64 | 229 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 225 | T | 32 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | – | + |
| 226 | T | 32 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 229 | Sp | 32 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| 231 | Sp | 64 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | – | + |
| 232 | T | > 256 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | + | – | – | + |
| 235 | T | 32 | 2 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | – | + |
Primer sets targeting β-lactamase genes (displayed by Ambler class), insertion sequence (ISAba1), and mobile gene elements. Source (Sp sputum, T tissue/wound, U urine, B blood); MIC meropenem (≤ 2 μg/mL = Sensitive, ≥ 8 μg/mL = Resistant); KPC (KPC subtypes 1, 2, 5, 10); CTX (CTX-M subtypes 1, 2 8, 9, 25); MBL metallo-β-lactamase (DIM, GIM, IMP, NDM, SIM, SPM, VIM); EDTA DDS double disk synergy assay, ICA1 class 1 integron cassette array, int123, conserved region of integrases 1, 2, and 3. All PCR reactions run in duplicate with proper control strains
Fig. 1Biofilm production of CRAB isolates at 24 h (48 h data not shown) in 96-well polystyrene plate using Crystal Violet staining method. a Biofilm production with isolates grouped as old and new isolates (*p = 0.03). b Isolates grouped by clinical source exhibited non-significant value, may be due to lack of clonal heterogeneity. c CRAB isolates showing biofilm production, grouped by MLST sequence type/strain type (*p = 0.04)