Literature DB >> 29145647

Trends and Correlates of Waterpipe use in the European Union: Analysis of Selected Eurobarometer Surveys (2009-2017).

Filippos T Filippidis1,2, Mohammed Jawad1, Constantine I Vardavas2,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the trends and correlates of waterpipe use between 2009 and 2017 in the 28 European Union (EU) member states.
METHODS: We analyzed data from wave 72.3 (2009, n = 27788); wave 77.1 (2012, n = 26751); wave 82.4 (2014, n = 27801); and wave 87.1 (2017, n = 27901) of the Eurobarometer survey. Representative samples of EU residents aged ≥15 years were asked to report ever use of waterpipe. Regular waterpipe use, i.e., at least once a month was also assessed in 2017. Associations of ever and current use with sociodemographic factors were assessed with multilevel logistic regression.
RESULTS: The prevalence of ever waterpipe use in the EU increased from 11.6% in 2009 to 16.3% in 2014 before dropping to 12.9% in 2017, but there was wide variation between EU member states, ranging from 2.3% (Croatia, 2009) to 41.7% (Latvia, 2017). Regular waterpipe use was highest in Austria (3.6%), Latvia (2.5%) and Belgium (2.0%) in 2017. Respondents aged 15-24 years were 11.43 times more likely (95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.71 to 12.21) to have ever used waterpipe compared to those 55 years and older. Regular and ever waterpipe use were also more likely among current and former cigarette smokers. Males (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.58 to 1.70) and those living in urban areas (aOR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.30 to 1.42) were more likely to have ever used waterpipe.
CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of EU citizens, especially young men, have tried waterpipe. Regular use is relatively limited, but more systematic surveillance is required to monitor trends across the EU. IMPLICATIONS: Data on waterpipe use in the European Union are scarce. The prevalence of ever waterpipe use in the EU increased from 11.6% in 2009 to 16.3% in 2014 before dropping to 12.9% in 2017, with wide variation between EU member states. Males, those living in urban areas, younger respondents, and current or former cigarette smokers were more likely to be ever or regular users of waterpipe.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29145647     DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  5 in total

1.  Transitions from and to roll-your-own tobacco, perceptions and health beliefs among smokers: findings from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys.

Authors:  Filippos T Filippidis; Pete Driezen; Christina N Kyriakos; Paraskevi Katsaounou; Ioanna Petroulia; Charis Girvalaki; Marcela Fu; Esteve Fernández; Ute Mons; Antigona C Trofor; Tibor Demjén; Krzysztof Przewoźniak; Witold A Zatoński; Geoffrey T Fong; Yannis Tountas; Constantine I Vardavas
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Price elasticity of demand of non-cigarette tobacco products: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Jawad; John Tayu Lee; Stanton Glantz; Christopher Millett
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Do pictorial health warnings on waterpipe tobacco packs matter? Recall effectiveness among Egyptian waterpipe smokers & non-smokers.

Authors:  Aya Mostafa; Heba Tallah Mohammed; Rasha Saad Hussein; Wafaa Mohamed Hussein; Mahmoud Elhabiby; Wael Safwat; Sahar Labib; Aisha Aboul Fotouh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Shishas: Another Way of Tobacco Smoking… Another Source of Exposure to Toxic Compounds.

Authors:  Marcela Fu; Ariadna Feliu; Esteve Fernández
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Adolescents' Perceptions of Harmfulness of Tobacco and Tobacco-like Products in Finland.

Authors:  Salma El-Amin; Jaana M Kinnunen; Arja Rimpelä
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.