Literature DB >> 29143599

Epistasis, physical capacity-related genes and exceptional longevity: FNDC5 gene interactions with candidate genes FOXOA3 and APOE.

Noriyuki Fuku1, Roberto Díaz-Peña2,3, Yasumichi Arai4, Yukiko Abe4, Hirofumi Zempo5, Hisashi Naito5, Haruka Murakami6, Motohiko Miyachi6, Carlos Spuch7, José A Serra-Rexach8, Enzo Emanuele9, Nobuyoshi Hirose5, Alejandro Lucia10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Forkhead box O3A (FOXOA3) and apolipoprotein E (APOE) are arguably the strongest gene candidates to influence human exceptional longevity (EL, i.e., being a centenarian), but inconsistency exists among cohorts. Epistasis, defined as the effect of one locus being dependent on the presence of 'modifier genes', may contribute to explain the missing heritability of complex phenotypes such as EL. We assessed the potential association of epistasis among candidate polymorphisms related to physical capacity, as well as antioxidant defense and cardiometabolic traits, and EL in the Japanese population. A total of 1565 individuals were studied, subdivided into 822 middle-aged controls and 743 centenarians.
RESULTS: We found a FOXOA3 rs2802292 T-allele-dependent association of fibronectin type III domain-containing 5 (FDNC5) rs16835198 with EL: the frequency of carriers of the FOXOA3 rs2802292 T-allele among individuals with the rs16835198 GG genotype was significantly higher in cases than in controls (P < 0.05). On the other hand, among non-carriers of the APOE 'risk' ε4-allele, the frequency of the FDNC5 rs16835198 G-allele was higher in cases than in controls (48.4% vs. 43.6%, P < 0.05). Among carriers of the 'non-risk' APOE ε2-allele, the frequency of the rs16835198 G-allele was higher in cases than in controls (49% vs. 37.3%, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The association of FDNC5 rs16835198 with EL seems to depend on the presence of the FOXOA3 rs2802292 T-allele and we report a novel association between FNDC5 rs16835198 stratified by the presence of the APOE ε2/ε4-allele and EL. More research on 'gene*gene' and 'gene*environment' effects is needed in the field of EL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APOE; Ageing; Centenarians; Exceptional longevity; FNDC5; FOXO3A

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29143599      PMCID: PMC5688477          DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4194-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Background

Exceptional longevity (EL), defined as reaching 100+ years of age, is a generally accepted model of healthy aging with major age-related diseases usually delayed [1], and sometimes even avoided, in centenarians [2]. Age at death during adulthood has a heritability of ~ 25% [3] and consequently EL is likely to be, at least in part, a heritable phenotype. However, genome wide association studies (GWAS) of individuals with EL have mostly yielded poor results, with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) and/or forkhead box O3A (FOXOA3) genes being usually the only variants achieving genome-wide significance [3], although there is no unanimity for FOXOA3 [4]. The APOE ε4-allele, which is linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular and Alzheimer’s disease [5, 6], is associated with a lower likelihood of reaching EL, whereas the ε2-allele seems to show a positive association with EL and is more frequently found in centenarians than in younger controls [7]. Nonetheless, the aforementioned associations can vary by population [7]. Similarly, there is evidence that genetic polymorphisms in the FOXO3A gene can be associated with EL, especially the rs2802292 SNP [8-12], but such an association has not been corroborated in some cohorts [13, 14]. On the other hand, aging is inevitably associated with a decline physical function, especially in muscle mass and function (i.e., sarcopenia), with an acceleration of this process increasing the risk of mortality [15]. As such, there is a rationale for postulating the potential influence on EL of several variations in genes that are candidates to influence physical capacity and muscle function; however, up to date such candidate genes [e.g., α-actinin-3 (ACTN3), thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRHR) or acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 1 (ACSL1)], have not shown individual associations with EL [16, 17]. Epistasis, defined as the effect of one locus on a given phenotype being dependent on the presence of one or more ‘modifier genes’, may contribute to explain the missing heritability of complex phenotypes [18]. Though research on the role of epistasis in EL has been rather limited in the past [19], evidence for an impact of genetic interactions in determining human longevity is quickly growing. For instance, longevity may be partly determined by epistatic interactions involving mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) loci [20]. Also, a combination of functional SNPs within adenosine deaminase (ADA) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) genes can influence life-expectancy in a gender-specific manner [21]. More recently, Tan et al. reported that interactions of SNPs in the FOXO gene family influences longevity [22]. To our knowledge, only two studies have included the APOE gene for evaluating gene x gene effects on longevity [23, 24]. Jazwinski et al. reported that the GTPase HRAS (also known as transforming protein p21, HRAS1) and ceramide synthase 1 (also known as LAG1, longevity assurance homolog, LASS1) genes interact with the APOE gene to reduce age-related increases in lipotoxic events, and haplotypes conformed by the two genes are associated with EL [23]. In the other study, epistasis analysis was performed between APOE haplotypes and haptoglobulin gene (HP) functional polymorphisms, with HP *1/*1 genotype protecting APOE ε4-carriers from age-related negative selection; in light of these results, the authors called for further research on APOE/HP interactions in age-related diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease [24]. Japan has the longest life expectancy in the world, as well as the highest number of individuals reaching EL [25]. Thus, Japanese long-lived people represent an attractive model to study potential genetic contributors to EL. The purpose of the present study was to assess whether the interaction between variants in genes that are candidates to influence physical capacity and energy metabolism [ACTN3, TRHR, ACSL1], interact with APOE and FOXO3A genes, and potentially associate with EL in the Japanese population. We also studied the potential interaction with candidate genes involved in antioxidant defense [glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1), superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2)] and cardiometabolic traits [fibronectin type III domain-containing 5 (FNDC5), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2B antisense noncoding RNA (CDKN2B-AS1)],

Results

The observed genotypic distributions of SNPs were consistent with Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) expectations both in controls and centenarians (P > 0.05). Table 1 shows the single marker allelic association results of the 12 SNPs included in the study. The frequency of the APOE ε2-allele was higher in cases than in controls, whereas ε4-allele frequency was lower in the former (all P < 0.01), as shown previously by us using part of the present cohort [26]. None of the other SNPs, including FOXOA3 rs2802292, was associated with EL, and genotypes did not differ significantly between cases and controls in the recessive, dominant or additive models (all P > 0.05) (data not shown). No significant differences were observed in sex-based analyses (data not shown).
Table 1

Single marker allelic association results of the 12 genetic variants included in the study

ChromosomeSNPGenePositionMinor allelenucleotideMinor allele frequencyPBONF ORlower 95%CIUpper 95%CI
CentenariansControls
1rs16835198 FNDC5 32,861,080G0.480.450.4881.161.001.33
2rs1050450 GPX1 49,357,401T0.080.0810.950.731.25
4rs6552828 ASCL1 1.85E + 08G0.400.4110.950.821.10
6rs4880 SOD2 1.6E + 08G0.130.1410.940.771.16
8rs7832552 TRHR 1.09E + 08T0.500.5010.970.851.12
8rs7460 PTK2 1.41E + 08T0.360.3611.000.8601.15
8rs7843014 PTK2 1.41E + 08A0.250.2710.880.751.04
9rs1333049 CDKN2B-AS1 22,125,504C0.470.4611.050.911.21
9rs2802292 FOXO3A 108,587,315G0.290.2811.050.901.23
11rs1815739 ACTN3 66,560,624C0.460.4710.960.841.11
19rs429358 APOE 44,908,684C0.050.116.19 × 10−10 0.390.290.52
19rs7412 APOE 44,908,882T0.070.040.0021.801.322.46

Allele frequencies were compared using chi-square statistics; ORs and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated using Plink software

Abbreviations: 95%CI 95% confidence interval, OR odds ratio, P P-value after Bonferroni correction, SNP single nucleotide polymorphism

Single marker allelic association results of the 12 genetic variants included in the study Allele frequencies were compared using chi-square statistics; ORs and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated using Plink software Abbreviations: 95%CI 95% confidence interval, OR odds ratio, P P-value after Bonferroni correction, SNP single nucleotide polymorphism With regards to epistasis, we found a FOXOA3 rs2802292 T-allele-dependent association of fibronectin type III domain-containing 5 (FDNC5) rs16835198 with EL, that is, among individuals with the rs16835198 GG genotype, the frequency of carriers of the FOXOA3 rs2802292 T-allele was significantly higher in cases than in controls (P < 0.05; Table 2). On the other hand, among non-carriers of the APOE ‘risk’ ε4-allele, the frequency of the FDNC5 rs16835198 G-allele was higher in cases than in controls (48.4% vs. 43.6%, P < 0.05; Table 3). In turn, among carriers of the ‘non-risk’ APOE ε2-allele, the frequency of the rs16835198 G-allele was higher in cases than in controls (49% vs. 37.3%, P < 0.05). No other significant gene interaction was found to be associated with EL.
Table 2

Genotypic frequency distribution of FNDC5 rs16835198 according to the FDNC5 rs16835198 T-allele presence

FDNC5 (rs16835198)Genotype FOXO3A Presence of rs2802292 T-allele P-valueOR (95% CI)
Controls (n = 754)Centenarians (n = 668)
GG147 (19.5%)162 (24.3%)0.0351.32 (1.03–1.70)
GT378 (50.1%)323 (48.3%)NS
TT229 (30.4%)183 (27.4%)NS

Abbreviations: 95%CI 95% confidence interval, NS not significant, OR odds ratio

Table 3

Allele frequency distribution of FNDC5 rs16835198 alleles according to APOE ε2/ε4 status in the study population

FNDC5 (rs16835198)alleleAbsence of APOE ε4-allelea Presence of APOE ε4-allelea
Controls (2n = 1306)Centenarians (2n = 1340)Controls (2n = 336)Centenarians (2n = 128)
GN57064816562
%43.6%48.4%49.1%48.4%
P-value0.0167NS
OR (95% CI)1.21 (1.04, 1.41)
TN73669217166
%56.4%51.6%50.9%51.6%
P-value0.0167NS
OR (95% CI)0.83 (0.71–0.96)
FNDC5 (rs16835198)alleleAbsence of APOE ε2-allelea Presence of APOE ε2-allelea
Controls (2n = 1508)Centenarians (2n = 1258)Controls (2n = 134)Centenarians (2n = 210)
Gn68560750103
%45.4%48.3%37.3%49%
P-valueNS0.035
OR (95% CI)1.62 (1.04–2.52)
Tn82365184107
%54.6%51.7%62.7%51%
P-valueNS0.035
OR (95% CI)0.62 (0.40–0.96)

Abbreviations: 95%CI 95% confidence interval, NS not significant, OR odds ratio

aAll individuals underwent genotyping for rs429358 and rs7412. The 3 major isoforms of human APOE gene (E2, E3, and E4) coded by 3 alleles (ε2, ε3, and ε4) differ in amino acid sequence at 2 sites, residue 112 (rs429358) and residue 158 (rs7412)

Genotypic frequency distribution of FNDC5 rs16835198 according to the FDNC5 rs16835198 T-allele presence Abbreviations: 95%CI 95% confidence interval, NS not significant, OR odds ratio Allele frequency distribution of FNDC5 rs16835198 alleles according to APOE ε2/ε4 status in the study population Abbreviations: 95%CI 95% confidence interval, NS not significant, OR odds ratio aAll individuals underwent genotyping for rs429358 and rs7412. The 3 major isoforms of human APOE gene (E2, E3, and E4) coded by 3 alleles (ε2, ε3, and ε4) differ in amino acid sequence at 2 sites, residue 112 (rs429358) and residue 158 (rs7412)

Discussion

Excluding APOE, the present findings do not show replicable association of individual candidate genes, included those related to physical capacity and muscle function, with EL. However, we also assessed the effects of interactions among candidate polymorphisms on the one hand, and EL, on the other hand. In this regard, we report an association of FDNC5 rs16835198 with EL that seems to depend on the presence of the FOXOA3 rs2802292 T-allele. Moreover, we found a novel association between FNDC5 rs16835198 stratified by the presence of the APOE ε2/ε4-allele, and EL. We believe this is an interesting finding because FNDC5 gene encodes the precursor of irisin which, although there is controversy [27], was recently identified a myokine -that is, a molecule released by muscles [28]. Irisin induces expression of uncoupling protein 1 and other brown adipose tissue-associated genes [partly via increased peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor α (PPAR-α)] in white adipocytes, and thus increases thermogenesis and switching of these cells towards a brown fat-like phenotype [28]. In fact irisin has been postulated as a therapeutic agent against cardiometabolic disorders and a major component of the ‘exercise polypill’ [29]. Several mechanisms may link genetic variations in FOXO3A and FNDC5 genes with EL. For example, dysregulation of the nutrient-sensing somatotropic axis [comprising growth hormone and its secondary mediator, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)] is a major hallmark of human aging [30]. IGF-1 and insulin signaling collectively represent the “insulin and IGF-1 signaling” pathway. Among the multiple targets of this pathway is the FOXO family of transcription factors, which are also involved in aging and show striking evolutionary conservation [31]. High serum irisin levels may contribute to successful aging, with circulating levels of this biomarker being in fact significantly higher in disease-free centenarians than in young healthy controls and being particularly higher than in young patients with acute myocardial infarction [32]. Moreover, genetic variants in the FNDC5 gene have been associated with in vivo insulin sensitivity [33], and aging is associated with alterations in insulin sensitivity/signaling [34]. Irisin might also play a significant role in reducing the risk of obesity or several related diseases [35]. In a previous report, we found no significant association between genotype and allele frequencies of polymorphisms in FNDC5 and EL [36]. However, the rs16835198 G-allele was associated with a trend towards lower luciferase gene repoter activity in vitro [36]. Insulin sensitivity could be a link explaining the association of the combination of the two loci in FOXO3A and FNDC5, as well as in APOE and FNDC5, with EL. Insulin metabolism as well as insulin-altering therapies in Alzheimer’s disease are modulated by APOE status [37, 38], while irisin reduces diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance in vivo [28]. The FNDC5 rs16835198 G-allele could favor longevity in combination with the APOE ε2-variant, contributing to situations in which rs16835198 SNP distribution is found among long-lived subjects in proportions similar to those found in younger controls. Thus, the conditional effects of genes on the phenotype of aging could play a role in longevity. Most studies show a lower frequency of the APOE ε4-allele in centenarians than in younger controls, while the APOE ε2-allele might be more frequent in centenarians than in younger controls [7]. A “gene x gene” interaction would introduce a modifying allele in another locus, changing the impact of the risk/protective allele from deleterious to beneficial, or vice versa. Here, we report a significant effect of the rs16835198-G allele in the FNDC5 gene on the association between APOE ε2 carriage/non-carriage and EL. There are some limitations in our study. First, our results should be ideally replicated in one or more ethnically and geographically-independent cohorts to account for potential differences in ‘gene x environment’ interactions. Another drawback of case: control designs as the present one is the choice of an appropriate control group, with demographic factors, notably differences in year of birth between centenarians and controls, being potential confounders (e.g., the centenarians and controls of our study were born in the early 1900s and after 1930, respectively) [39]. Differences in gender distribution between cases and controls are also to be accounted for because genetic factors influence survival at advanced age in a sex-specific manner [40]. In this regard, the potential demographic biases of cross-sectional comparisons of genotype/allele frequencies between controls and long lived individuals could be overcome by adding more complete demographic information to genetic data, allowing for estimation of survival rates related to candidate genes [40-42]. Because we have only analyzed one SNP within the FOXO3A and FNDC5 genes, further research with different variants of this or other genes involved in insulin-IGF-1, and insulin signaling collectively representing the “insulin and IGF-1 signaling” pathway, must be undertaken. On the other hand, the need for using independent populations for replication may generate some controversy. Some variants may have opposing consequences on the phenotype of interest, and the effect of gene x gene interactions on human health and lifespan might depend on several factors (e.g., internal and external exposure, including medication or different genetic backgrounds of individuals comprising the populations).

Conclusion

We found an association between FDNC5 rs16835198 stratified by the presence of the FOXOA3 rs2802292 T-allele, and EL, as well as between FNDC5 rs16835198 stratified by the presence of the APOE alleles, and EL. Our results suggest the need for further investigation on the possible influence of FOXO3A/FNDC5 interactions and APOE/FNDC5 interactions with EL, but also with other age-related diseases such as atherosclerosis, Alzheimer’s, or Parkinson’s disease. Moreover, identification of gene x gene and gene x environmental factors effects on lifespan may significantly improve our understanding of the association between genetic and non-genetic regulators of aging.

Methods

Study population

A total of 1565 individuals were recruited: 822 controls (aged 23–65 years; 604 women, 218 men) and 743 cases (centenarians aged 100–115 years; 623 women, 1120 men). The controls were enrolled from the Nutrition and EXercise Intervention Study (NEXIS) registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT 00926744). Inclusion criteria for the control group were being a man or woman aged 23–65 years with no history of stroke, cardiovascular disease, chronic renal failure, or walking difficulties related to knee or back pain [43]. Cases were collected from two cohorts that have been described in detail elsewhere [44]: the Tokyo Centenarians Study (TCS) and the Semi-Supercentenarians Study in Japan (SSC-J). The prevalence rates of hypertension, coronary artery disease and dementia in the Japanese centenarians were 63.6, 28.8 and 59.4%, respectively [26].

Genotyping

Total DNA was extracted from venous blood with the QIAamp DNA Blood Maxi Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). SNP genotyping was performed using the following TaqMan® genotyping assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA): C__34204885_10 for rs16835198, Custom TaMan® Assay for rs1050450, C__30469648_10 for rs6552828, C___8709053_10 for rs4880, C__29085798_10 for rs7832552, C____243385_10 for rs7460, C__11605645_10 for rs7843014, C___1754666_10 for rs1333049, C___1841568_10 for rs2802292, C____590093_1 for rs1815739, C____904973_10 for rs7412 and C___3084793_20 for rs429358. Several quality control procedures, such as repeating the genotyping on a random 10% of the samples were carried out to assure no discrepant results in samples.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of high-density SNP genotyping data was carried out as follows: allele frequencies in cases and controls were compared using chi-square statistics, and odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using Plink software [45]. Bonferroni correction was applied by dividing the P-value by the number of SNPs tested to give the corrected P-value. Allele frequencies obtained for each SNP were tested for deviations from HWE expectations. The combined effects of APOE and FOXO3A alleles and SNPs studied on the risk of EL were analyzed by binary logistic regression with SPSS v.22 statistical software (IBM, Somers, NY, USA) and OR and P values were calculated.
  45 in total

1.  Sex and age specificity of susceptibility genes modulating survival at old age.

Authors:  Giuseppe Passarino; Alberto Montesanto; Serena Dato; Sabrina Giordano; Filippo Domma; Vincenzo Mari; Emidio Feraco; Giovanna De Benedictis
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 2.  Exercise is the real polypill.

Authors:  Carmen Fiuza-Luces; Nuria Garatachea; Nathan A Berger; Alejandro Lucia
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-09

3.  Four Genome-Wide Association Studies Identify New Extreme Longevity Variants.

Authors:  Paola Sebastiani; Anastasia Gurinovich; Harold Bae; Stacy Andersen; Alberto Malovini; Gil Atzmon; Francesco Villa; Aldi T Kraja; Danny Ben-Avraham; Nir Barzilai; Annibale Puca; Thomas T Perls
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  The apolipoprotein E polymorphism and cardiovascular diseases--an autopsy study.

Authors:  Neena Theresa Kumar; Knut Liestøl; Else Marit Løberg; Henrik Mikael Reims; Sverre-Henning Brorson; Jan Maehlen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Pathol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.185

5.  ApoE gene and exceptional longevity: Insights from three independent cohorts.

Authors:  Nuria Garatachea; Enzo Emanuele; Miguel Calero; Noriyuki Fuku; Yasumichi Arai; Yukiko Abe; Haruka Murakami; Motohiko Miyachi; Thomas Yvert; Zoraida Verde; Ma Ascensión Zea; Letizia Venturini; Catalina Santiago; Alejandro Santos-Lozano; Gabriel Rodríguez-Romo; Giovanni Ricevuti; Nobuyoshi Hirose; Alberto Rábano; Alejandro Lucia
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 4.032

6.  Functional status of centenarians in Tokyo, Japan: developing better phenotypes of exceptional longevity.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Gondo; Nobuyoshi Hirose; Yasumichi Arai; Hiroki Inagaki; Yukie Masui; Ken Yamamura; Ken-ichirou Shimizu; Michiyo Takayama; Yoshinori Ebihara; Susumu Nakazawa; Koji Kitagawa
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  HRAS1 and LASS1 with APOE are associated with human longevity and healthy aging.

Authors:  S Michal Jazwinski; Sangkyu Kim; Jianliang Dai; Li Li; Xiuhua Bi; James C Jiang; Jonathan Arnold; Mark A Batzer; Jerilyn A Walker; David A Welsh; Christina M Lefante; Julia Volaufova; Leann Myers; L Joseph Su; Dorothy B Hausman; Michael V Miceli; Eric Ravussin; Leonard W Poon; Katie E Cherry; Michael A Welsch
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 9.304

8.  Insulin effects on glucose metabolism, memory, and plasma amyloid precursor protein in Alzheimer's disease differ according to apolipoprotein-E genotype.

Authors:  S Craft; S Asthana; G Schellenberg; L Baker; M Cherrier; A A Boyt; R N Martins; M Raskind; E Peskind; S Plymate
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  A novel permutation test for case-only analysis identifies epistatic effects on human longevity in the FOXO gene family.

Authors:  Qihua Tan; Mette Soerensen; Torben A Kruse; Kaare Christensen; Lene Christiansen
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 9.304

10.  Is irisin a human exercise gene?

Authors:  James A Timmons; Keith Baar; Peter K Davidsen; Philip J Atherton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 69.504

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Genetic and epigenetic regulation of human aging and longevity.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Bradley J Willcox; Timothy A Donlon
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 5.187

2.  Fibronectin type III domain-containing 5 in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases: a promising biomarker and therapeutic target.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Can Hu; Hai-Ming Wu; Zhen-Guo Ma; Qi-Zhu Tang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 7.169

Review 3.  How Important Are Genes to Achieve Longevity?

Authors:  Calogero Caruso; Mattia Emanuela Ligotti; Giulia Accardi; Anna Aiello; Giovanni Duro; Damiano Galimberti; Giuseppina Candore
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 4.  The Genetic Variability of APOE in Different Human Populations and Its Implications for Longevity.

Authors:  Paolo Abondio; Marco Sazzini; Paolo Garagnani; Alessio Boattini; Daniela Monti; Claudio Franceschi; Donata Luiselli; Cristina Giuliani
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Interactions Between Genes From Aging Pathways May Influence Human Lifespan and Improve Animal to Human Translation.

Authors:  Svetlana Ukraintseva; Matt Duan; Konstantin Arbeev; Deqing Wu; Olivia Bagley; Arseniy P Yashkin; Galina Gorbunova; Igor Akushevich; Alexander Kulminski; Anatoliy Yashin
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-08-19

6.  ApoE-associated modulation of neuroprotection from Aβ-mediated neurodegeneration in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Edward F Griffin; Samuel E Scopel; Cayman A Stephen; Adam C Holzhauer; Madeline A Vaji; Ryan A Tuckey; Laura A Berkowitz; Kim A Caldwell; Guy A Caldwell
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.758

Review 7.  The Controversial Role of Irisin in Clinical Management of Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Wen-Lu Ou-Yang; Bei Guo; Feng Xu; Xiao Lin; Fu-Xing-Zi Li; Su-Kang Shan; Feng Wu; Yi Wang; Ming-Hui Zheng; Qiu-Shuang Xu; Ling-Qing Yuan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.