Literature DB >> 29143085

Clinical Significance of New Magnetic Resonance Thoracic Ductography Before Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Junya Oguma1, Soji Ozawa2, Akihito Kazuno1, Miho Nitta1, Yamato Ninomiya1, Kentaro Yatabe1, Tetsu Niwa3, Takakiyo Nomura3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative simulation of the thoracic duct using magnetic resonance thoracic ductography (MRTD) would enable a safe lymph node dissection near the thoracic duct and the prevention of chylothorax after an esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to determine whether MRTD is useful for preventing injury to the thoracic duct during surgery and for reducing the incidence of chylothorax after surgery.
METHODS: We evaluated 130 patients who underwent preoperative MRTD followed by a thoracoscopic esophagectomy for the treatment of thoracic esophageal cancer between August 2014 and April 2017 (MRTD group). These patients were then compared with 160 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent a thoracoscopic esophagectomy without preoperative MRTD (non-MRTD group).
RESULTS: Four patients in the non-MRTD group developed Type IIIB chylothorax (International Consensus on Standardization), while none of the patients in the MRTD group developed Type III chylothorax. Some type of abnormal finding was found during MRTD in 24 patients (18.5%). Among them, 13 patients (10.0%) exhibited abnormal divergence, which was the most frequent finding, followed by 5 patients (3.8%) with window formation and 2 patients (1.5%) with stitch formation.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed the frequencies of abnormal findings of the thoracic duct and of patients with false-negative MRTD findings. Injury to the thoracic duct can be avoided through the use of appropriate care during procedures performed in patients with abnormal findings on preoperative MRTD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29143085     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4372-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  24 in total

Review 1.  Management of thoracic duct injuries after oesophagectomy.

Authors:  S A Wemyss-Holden; B Launois; G J Maddern
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  THE MANAGEMENT OF CHYLOTHORAX.

Authors:  K R WILLIAMS; T H BURFORD
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Thoracic duct injury during esophagectomy: 20 years experience at a tertiary care center in a developing country.

Authors:  D V L N Rao; S P Chava; P Sahni; T K Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG).

Authors:  Donald E Low; Derek Alderson; Ivan Cecconello; Andrew C Chang; Gail E Darling; Xavier Benoit DʼJourno; S Michael Griffin; Arnulf H Hölscher; Wayne L Hofstetter; Blair A Jobe; Yuko Kitagawa; John C Kucharczuk; Simon Ying Kit Law; Toni E Lerut; Nick Maynard; Manuel Pera; Jeffrey H Peters; C S Pramesh; John V Reynolds; B Mark Smithers; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Postesophagectomy chylothorax: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Rachit D Shah; James D Luketich; Matthew J Schuchert; Neil A Christie; Arjun Pennathur; Rodney J Landreneau; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Prevention of chylothorax complicating extensive esophageal resection by mass ligation of thoracic duct: a random control study.

Authors:  Fan-Cai Lai; Long Chen; Yuan-Rong Tu; Min Lin; Xu Li
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Postoperative chylothorax.

Authors:  R J Cerfolio; M S Allen; C Deschamps; V F Trastek; P C Pairolero
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  S P Dexter; I G Martin; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Thoracic duct injury following esophagectomy in carcinoma of the esophagus: ligation by the abdominal approach.

Authors:  Pramod Kumar Mishra; Sundeep Singh Saluja; Dinesh Ramaswamy; Satinderpal Singh Bains; Parvez David Haque
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Combining non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance thoracic ductography with vascular contrast-enhanced computed tomography to identify the canine thoracic duct.

Authors:  Kenji Kutara; Teppei Kanda; Noritaka Maeta; Yohei Mochizuki; Fumiko Ono; Yoshiki Itoh; Taketoshi Asanuma
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2020-03-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.