Katja Spanier1, Elliot Michel2, Elke Peters3, Friedrich Michael Radoschewski2, Matthias Bethge3. 1. Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany. katja.spanier@uksh.de. 2. Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstraße 13 A, Berlin, 10117, Germany. 3. Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to analyze the longitudinal effects of organizational injustice (OIJ) and effort-reward imbalance (ERI) on work ability, emotional role functioning and physical role functioning. METHODS: Longitudinal data with a two-year follow-up of people previously receiving sickness absence benefits were used for analyses. OIJ and ERI were included separately and mutually in logistic regression models. Effects were tested for additivity. All analyses were additionally performed stratified by sex. All models were adjusted for sociodemographics and neuroticism. RESULTS: 1886 participants (44.5% men, mean age: 48 years) were included. When mutually adjusted, OIJ and ERI affected work ability, and OIJ affected emotional role functioning. In stratified analyses, OIJ affected all outcomes in women, and ERI affected work ability in men. Additive effects of OIJ and ERI were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: OIJ and ERI are important risk factors of limited participation. People with experiences of health-related and work-related impairments are in need of reliable structures and just working conditions.
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to analyze the longitudinal effects of organizational injustice (OIJ) and effort-reward imbalance (ERI) on work ability, emotional role functioning and physical role functioning. METHODS: Longitudinal data with a two-year follow-up of people previously receiving sickness absence benefits were used for analyses. OIJ and ERI were included separately and mutually in logistic regression models. Effects were tested for additivity. All analyses were additionally performed stratified by sex. All models were adjusted for sociodemographics and neuroticism. RESULTS: 1886 participants (44.5% men, mean age: 48 years) were included. When mutually adjusted, OIJ and ERI affected work ability, and OIJ affected emotional role functioning. In stratified analyses, OIJ affected all outcomes in women, and ERI affected work ability in men. Additive effects of OIJ and ERI were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: OIJ and ERI are important risk factors of limited participation. People with experiences of health-related and work-related impairments are in need of reliable structures and just working conditions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Effort–reward imbalance; Longitudinal design; Organizational justice; Role functioning; Work ability
Authors: Maria Carmen Martinez; Maria do Rosário Dias de Oliveira Latorre; Frida Marina Fischer Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2015-05-24 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Thomas Lund; Mika Kivimäki; Merete Labriola; Ebbe Villadsen; Karl Bang Christensen Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2007-07-11 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Pernille U Hjarsbech; Karl Bang Christensen; Jakob B Bjorner; Ida E H Madsen; Sannie V Thorsen; Isabella G Carneiro; Ulla Christensen; Reiner Rugulies Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Hermann Burr; Stefanie Lange; Marion Freyer; Maren Formazin; Uwe Rose; Martin Lindhardt Nielsen; Paul Maurice Conway Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2021-06-27 Impact factor: 3.015