Literature DB >> 29138087

Beyond modularity: Fine-scale mechanisms and rules for brain network reconfiguration.

Ankit N Khambhati1, Marcelo G Mattar2, Nicholas F Wymbs3, Scott T Grafton4, Danielle S Bassett5.   

Abstract

The human brain is in constant flux, as distinct areas engage in transient communication to support basic behaviors as well as complex cognition. The collection of interactions between cortical and subcortical areas forms a functional brain network whose topology evolves with time. Despite the nontrivial dynamics that are germane to this networked system, experimental evidence demonstrates that functional interactions organize into putative brain systems that facilitate different facets of cognitive computation. We hypothesize that such dynamic functional networks are organized around a set of rules that constrain their spatial architecture - which brain regions may functionally interact - and their temporal architecture - how these interactions fluctuate over time. To objectively uncover these organizing principles, we apply an unsupervised machine learning approach called non-negative matrix factorization to time-evolving, resting state functional networks in 20 healthy subjects. This machine learning approach automatically groups temporally co-varying functional interactions into subgraphs that represent putative topological modes of dynamic functional architecture. We find that subgraphs are stratified based on both the underlying modular organization and the topographical distance of their strongest interactions: while many subgraphs are largely contained within modules, others span between modules and are expressed differently over time. The relationship between dynamic subgraphs and modular architecture is further highlighted by the ability of time-varying subgraph expression to explain inter-individual differences in module reorganization. Collectively, these results point to the critical role that subgraphs play in constraining the topography and topology of functional brain networks. More broadly, this machine learning approach opens a new door for understanding the architecture of dynamic functional networks during both task and rest states, and for probing alterations of that architecture in disease.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive control; Community detection; Functional connectivity; Network neuroscience; Non-negative matrix factorization; Subgraph

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29138087     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

1.  Learning in brain-computer interface control evidenced by joint decomposition of brain and behavior.

Authors:  Jennifer Stiso; Marie-Constance Corsi; Jean M Vettel; Javier Garcia; Fabio Pasqualetti; Fabrizio De Vico Fallani; Timothy H Lucas; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 2.  Memory systems 2018 - Towards a new paradigm.

Authors:  J Ferbinteanu
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  LRRK2 and GBA Variants Exert Distinct Influences on Parkinson's Disease-Specific Metabolic Networks.

Authors:  Katharina A Schindlbeck; An Vo; Nha Nguyen; Chris C Tang; Martin Niethammer; Vijay Dhawan; Vicky Brandt; Rachel Saunders-Pullman; Susan B Bressman; David Eidelberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Modeling and interpreting mesoscale network dynamics.

Authors:  Ankit N Khambhati; Ann E Sizemore; Richard F Betzel; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Subgraphs of functional brain networks identify dynamical constraints of cognitive control.

Authors:  Ankit N Khambhati; John D Medaglia; Elisabeth A Karuza; Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Early childhood developmental functional connectivity of autistic brains with non-negative matrix factorization.

Authors:  Tianyi Zhou; Jiannan Kang; Fengyu Cong; Dr Xiaoli Li
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates brain functional connectivity in autism.

Authors:  Tianyi Zhou; Jiannan Kang; Zheng Li; He Chen; Xiaoli Li
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Roles of the prefrontal cortex in learning to time the onset of pre-existing motor programs.

Authors:  Beom-Chan Lee; Jongkwan Choi; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience.

Authors:  Steve Tompson; Emily B Falk; Jean M Vettel; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Personal Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-02

10.  Functional brain network reconfiguration during learning in a dynamic environment.

Authors:  Chang-Hao Kao; Ankit N Khambhati; Danielle S Bassett; Matthew R Nassar; Joseph T McGuire; Joshua I Gold; Joseph W Kable
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.