| Literature DB >> 29137627 |
Ayman A Elshayeb1, Abdelazim A Ahmed2,3, Marmar A El Siddig2, Adil A El Hussien2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enteric fever has persistence of great impact in Sudanese public health especially during rainy season when the causative agent Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi possesses pan endemic patterns in most regions of Sudan - Khartoum.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotics; Ciprofloxacin; Prediction; Resistance; Salmonella Typhi
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29137627 PMCID: PMC5686854 DOI: 10.1186/s12941-017-0247-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ISSN: 1476-0711 Impact factor: 3.944
Prediction of antibiotics resistance interpreted of 16 µg/mL
| Incubation |
| Dr 11 | Dr 14 | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual 12 h | 6 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 8 |
| Day 1 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 9 |
| Day 2 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 11 |
| Day 3 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 12 | 12 |
| Day 4 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 12 | 12 |
| Day 5 | 9 | 11 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 11 | 13 | 13 |
| Day 6 | 9 | 12 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 14 | 13 |
| Day 7 | 9 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 16 | 15 | 14 |
Predicting low-level resistance of antibiotics at 16 µg/mL as intermediate dose among S. Typhi is an indicator of treatment failure in the nearest future
Prediction of antibiotics resistance interpreted of 32 µg/mL
| Incubation |
| Dr 11 | Dr 14 | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual 12 h | 1 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Day 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Day 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Day 3 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Day 4 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Day 5 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Day 6 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 7 |
| Day 7 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 8 |
Probabilities of multi drug resistance occurrence
| Interpretation | Ciprofloxacin concentration µg/mL | Probability of resistance occurrence % |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.0 | 0 |
| S≥ | 8.0 | 25 |
| I= | 16.0 | 42 |
| R≤ | 32.0 | 58 |
| R≤ | 64.0 | 75 |
| R≤ | 128.0 | 92 |
Fig. 3Prediction of antibiotics MBC resistance’s trends at 16 µg/mL
Fig. 4Linear predicition of antibiotics MBC resistance’s trends at 32 µg/mL
Results of linear predictive patterns of resistance in Salmonella Typhi
| Sample | 16 µg/mL | 32 µg/mL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exponential trend | Coefficient | Exponential trend | Coefficient | |
|
| y = 6.2391e0.0513x | R2 = 0.7208 | y = 0.5978e0.2636x | R2 = 0.9455 |
| Dr11 | y = 7.621e0.0604x | R2 = 0.7886 | y = 8.0752e0.0458x | R2 = 0.9347 |
| Dr14 | y = 5.2505e0.0676x | R2 = 0.7903 | y = 3.7532e0.1528x | R2 = 0.7738 |
| S1 | y = 4.5725e0.0717x | R2 = 0.9591 | y = 1.153e0.3069x | R2 = 0.8695 |
| S2 | y = 3.2991e0.0977x | R2 = 0.9339 | y = 1.1018e0.2501x | R2 = 0.9066 |
| S3 | y = 2.7596e0.1016x | R2 = 0.9254 | y = 0.7688e0.2367x | R2 = 0.9544 |
| S4 | y = 3.6258e0.1079x | R2 = 0.6979 | y = 0.7328e0.172x | R2 = 0.9362 |
| S5 | y = 4.8046e0.0834x | R2 = 0.958 | y = 1.5462e0.1135x | R2 = 0.7652 |
| S6 | y = 5.5536e0.0552x | R2 = 0.8698 | y = 2.0479e0.1038x | R2 = 0.8484 |
| S7 | y = 5.7606e0.0459x | R2 = 0.884 | y = 1.8061e0.0911x | R2 = 0.9553 |
| S8 | y = 5.7004e0.1168x | R2 = 0.9397 | y = 4.5789e0.0745x | R2 = 0.9477 |
| S9 | y = 8.0663e0.0787x | R2 = 0.9797 | y = 5.2388e0.0759x | R2 = 0.886 |
| S10 | y = 7.7298e0.0796x | R2 = 0.9237 | y = 3.9538e0.0955x | R2 = 0.9566 |
Outbreaks’ simulation system parameters
| Description | Parameter | Estimated value | Simulated value | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial population | N0 | y = n ex | 1.0000 | Cell/mL |
| Bacteria replication time | t | (t > 0) | 30 | min |
| Bacterial replication rate | r | ln x(+a) | 100 | |
| Mortality of bacteria | m | ln x(−b) | 25 | |
| Probability to resist antibiotics | ∆ | 2.00 | ||
| Antibiotics influence dose | α | C16, C32 | 2.0 and 5.0 | µg/mL |
| Final population | Nt | ln x(a−b) | 2.99573 | Cell/mL |
| Resisted individuals (survived) | N | ln (x) | 12 | |
| Prediction of outbreaks | E | − 13.00% |
Fig. 5In silico simulations of MDR Salmonella Typhi outbreaks. The in silico monitoring system is a computational program based on Microsoft Excel sheet describes the predicting statistics was found to be suitable for monitoring the seasonal typhoid incidents during the outbreaks
Fig. 1Antibiogram criteria for multi-drug resistant strains
Fig. 2Antibiotics normal probability plot