| Literature DB >> 29137321 |
Chih-Jen Wu1,2,3, Cheng-Yi Chen1,4,5, Thung-S Lai6, Pei-Chen Wu1, Chih-Kuang Chuang7,8,9, Fang-Ju Sun4,10, Hsuan-Liang Liu7, Han-Hsiang Chen1,4, Hung-I Yeh11, Chih-Sheng Lin5, Cheng-Jui Lin1,7,4.
Abstract
Renal anemia is a common complication in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. In vitro studies have shown that indoxyl sulfate decreases erythropoietin production. Whether this effect is seen in vivo remains unclear. Our goal was to explore the role of indoxyl sulfate in renal anemia. We found serum indoxyl sulfate levels are significantly and negatively associated with erythropoietin levels in human. A multiple stepwise linear regression analyses after adjustment for other independent parameters revealed that free indoxyl sulfate, and total indoxyl sulfate were significantly associated with erythropoietin levels. In animal studies, erythropoietin gene and protein expression were markedly inhibited in rats with chronic kidney disease; however, this effect was significantly reversed by lowering serum indoxyl sulfate with AST-120. Indoxyl sulfate may also inhibit erythropoietin expression in animal models with chronic kidney disease. These findings further support the role of indoxyl sulfate in the development of renal anemia.Entities:
Keywords: chronic kidney disease; erythropoietin; indoxyl sulfate; renal anemia
Year: 2017 PMID: 29137321 PMCID: PMC5669947 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Baseline characteristics of the study patients.
| Variables | All (n=113) |
|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 57.1 ± 14.4 |
| Male (%) | 50.4 |
| Diabetes Mellitus (%) | 49.6 |
| Hypertension (%) | 48.7 |
| Cardiovascular disease (%) | 42.8 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 144.6 ± 16.1 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 75.7 ± 10.5 |
| CKD stage (%) | |
| 2 | 15.2 |
| 3 | 23.8 |
| 4 | 36.2 |
| 5 | 24.8 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.5 ± 0.5 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 26.8 ± 6.0 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 57.3 ± 22.5 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 3.1 ± 2.4 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2) | 20.9 ± 23.7 |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 9.1 ± 0.8 |
| Phosphate (mg/dL) | 4.3 ± 1.1 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 0.51 ± 0.32 |
| Fe (ug/dL) | 64.3 ± 23.7 |
| Ferritin (ng/mL) | 196.9 ± 95.2 |
| Free IS (mg/L) | 0.2 ± 0.6 |
| Total IS (mg/L) | 15.8 ± 6.9 |
| EPO (mIU/ml) | 12.2 ± 11.9 |
PS: values were expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise defined.
Abbreviation: BUN: blood Urea Nitrogen; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; CRP: C-reactive protein; Fe: ferrous; IS: indoxyl sulfate.; EPO: erythropoietin.
Simple and multiple stepwise linear regression analyses for EPO as a dependent.
| Simple variable analysis | Multiple variables analysis(Model I) | Multiple variables analysis(Model II) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 95% C.I. | B | 95% C.I. | B | 95% C.I. | ||||
| Sex(male/female) | 0.05 | -0.22∼0.33 | 0.693 | ||||||
| Age(y) | -0.01 | -0.01∼0.01 | 0.915 | ||||||
| DM (yes/no) | -0.16 | -0.44∼0.12 | 0.252 | ||||||
| Hypertension(yes/no) | 0.04 | -0.23∼0.31 | 0.771 | ||||||
| CVD(yes/no) | 0.29 | -0.07∼0.65 | 0.114 | ||||||
| CKD stages | -0.10 | -0.22∼0.01 | 0.086 | ||||||
| Hematocrit(%) | 0.02 | 0.00∼0.05 | 0.032 | ||||||
| Albumin (g/dL) | 0.02 | -0.33∼0.38 | 0.906 | ||||||
| BUN(mg/dL) | -0.01 | -0.01∼0.00 | 0.227 | ||||||
| Creatinine(mg/dL) | -0.05 | -0.12∼0.02 | 0.132 | ||||||
| eGFR(ml/min/1.73m2) | 0.01 | 0.00∼0.01 | 0.409 | ||||||
| Sodium (mg/dL) | 0.03 | -0.02∼0.08 | 0.280 | ||||||
| Potassium(mg/dL) | -0.12 | -0.37∼0.13 | 0.335 | ||||||
| Calcium(mg/dL) | 0.06 | -0.14∼0.25 | 0.553 | ||||||
| Phosphate(mg/dL) | -0.08 | -0.24∼0.09 | 0.349 | ||||||
| CRP(mg/dL) | 0.03 | -0.50∼0.56 | 0.904 | ||||||
| Fe(ug/dL) | -0.01 | -0.01∼0.01 | 0.727 | ||||||
| Ferritin(ng/mL) | -0.01 | 0.00∼0.00 | 0.879 | ||||||
| Free IS(mg/L) | -0.50 | -0.92∼-0.08 | 0.021 | -0.55 | -0.96∼-0.15 | 0.008 | |||
| Total IS(mg/L) | -0.03 | -0.06∼0.00 | 0.041 | -0.04 | -0.06∼-0.01 | 0.013 | |||
Figure 1Agreement between EPO and IS analyzed by Pearson’s correlation
(A) ln EPO vs T-IS, r=-0.22, p=0.041 (B) ln EPO vs F-IS, r=-0.25, p=0.021.
Figure 2The EPO expression status in an animal model
(A) Real-time quantitative PCR was performed to assess the change of EPO mRNA expression in control-sham, CKD and CKD+AST-120 group. EPO mRNA was suppressed in CKD rat. It was restored in rats with feeding AST-120 by lowering serum IS. (B) Western blot analysis. EPO protein expression was also decreased significantly in CKD rat. AST-120 could reverse the inhibition of EPO expression in CKD. n=5 for each, #, p<0.01 compared to control-sham group, *, p<0.05 compared CKD group.