Literature DB >> 29137218

Importance of FISH genetics in light chain amyloidosis.

Morie A Gertz1, Angela Dispenzieri1, Eli Muchtar1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  bortezomib; fluorescent in situ hybridization; individualized cancer treatment; light chain amyloidosis

Year:  2017        PMID: 29137218      PMCID: PMC5669844          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


× No keyword cloud information.
Our group led by Muchtar reported on the significance of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in light chain amyloidosis patients treated both with conventional chemotherapy and high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation. We reported a lower deep response rate in patients with t(11;14) that were treated with both bortezomib and immunomodulatory-based regimens when compared to those lacking t(11;14). This finding translated to an inferior overall survival in bortezomib and immunomodulatory-treated patients, and this adverse impact is confirmed in multivariable analysis [1]. This finding strongly suggests that patients with this specific genetic abnormality preferentially receive high-dose therapy with stem cell transplant or melphalan-based chemotherapy, which appears to abrogate this adverse effect. We also note that trisomies are a poor prognostic feature in AL amyloidosis. Abnormal cIg-FISH was significantly associated with advanced cardiac involvement and remained a prognostic factor on multivariate analysis. These findings expand and confirm a report from the Heidelberg Amyloidosis Center [2]. In that study, 101 AL amyloidosis patients uniformly treated with bortezomib-dexamethasone had FISH analysis. Unlike our population, none received high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. There was a lower response rate, shorter progression-free and overall survival in patients with t(11;14). Translocation (11;14) is common in plasma cell disorders, occurring in approximately 17% of patients with multiple myeloma but in 49-60% of light chain amyloidosis patients [3]. Although t(11;14) is considered a standard-risk feature in multiple myeloma, it appears that it bears an inferior outcome compared to other standard-risk markers. Translocation (11;14) in both myeloma and amyloidosis is associated with lower response rates but requires further research to understand the mechanism. It is unclear, given its high prevalence in AL amyloidosis, if t(11;14) is advantageous to the survival of the amyloid clone. Despite the disruption of the IgH locus by this translocation, it does not result in higher production of free light chain compared to AL amyloidosis patients lacking this translocation. The importance of FISH cytogenetics in the management of multiple myeloma is well-defined, and these genetics have now been incorporated into a Revised International Staging System where the presence of t(4;14), del(17p) and/or t(14;16) are associated with higher risk and define Revised International Stage 3 if the serum β2 microglobulin is >5.5 mg/L [4]. These myeloma patients have a five-year progression-free survival of only 24%. Genetic profiling is also used in the mSMART.org risk classification for multiple myeloma. Genetics are used to define the type of maintenance therapy, preferring bortezomib with high-risk FISH features, the duration of maintenance, and the use of tandem transplantation in eligible patients with high-risk FISH genetics. Deletion 17p carries the greatest impact on outcomes in myeloma, and it has been demonstrated that the administration of bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation significantly improves outcomes in patients with this genetic abnormality [5]. The FISH findings are not only prognostic but have important therapeutic implications. Even in MGUS (where a routine marrow examination is not indicated) and smoldering multiple myeloma, FISH abnormalities are predictive of risk of progression to myeloma although are not an indication for intervention. Other hematologic malignancies also have therapy driven by the presence of genetic mutations. In chronic myelogenous leukemia, the T315I mutation in tyrosine kinase predicts resistance to all tyrosine kinase inhibitors with the exception of Ponatinib [6]. As multiple myeloma and amyloidosis are increasingly recognized to be multiclonal diseases with heterogeneous genetic profiles by gene expression profiling and by whole exome sequencing, the ability to develop individualized cancer therapies is becoming a reality. Personalized therapy in multiple myeloma is not only driven by genetics as outlined in mSMART.org but by frailty indices calculated according to patient age and vulnerability with specific guidelines now developed on the dosing of thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide in patients who are fit, frail, or intermediate. The incorporation of disability and comorbidities has become an important consideration for the clinical treatment of elderly patients with multiple myeloma. A similar approach is utilized in the AL amyloidosis population which is oftentimes frail as a result of organ impairment and requires a multidisciplinary approach to coordinate their care. Recently, trials on the use of Venetoclax, an oral B cell lymphoma (BCL)-2 protein inhibitor, has shown specific activity in the myeloma subset of patients with the t(11;14) and heralds a new era of therapy selection specifically based on FISH abnormalities [7]. Hopefully, these results will be reproduced in the AL population, where t(11;14) is far more prevalent. The finding that FISH abnormalities drive therapy selection in light chain amyloidosis as well as myeloma is not a surprise and will certainly be followed by other treatment-specific targeted endpoints.
  7 in total

1.  Administration of bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation improves outcome in multiple myeloma patients with deletion 17p.

Authors:  Kai Neben; Henk M Lokhorst; Anna Jauch; Uta Bertsch; Thomas Hielscher; Bronno van der Holt; Hans Salwender; Igor W Blau; Katja Weisel; Michael Pfreundschuh; Christof Scheid; Ulrich Dührsen; Walter Lindemann; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Norma Peter; Christian Teschendorf; Hans Martin; Mathias Haenel; Hans G Derigs; Marc S Raab; Anthony D Ho; Helgi van de Velde; Dirk Hose; Pieter Sonneveld; Hartmut Goldschmidt
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Clinical implications of t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(4;14)(p16.3;q32), and -17p13 in myeloma patients treated with high-dose therapy.

Authors:  Morie A Gertz; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Philip R Greipp; Mark R Litzow; Kimberly J Henderson; Scott A Van Wier; Greg J Ahmann; Rafael Fonseca
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in untreated AL amyloidosis has an independent prognostic impact by abnormality type and treatment category.

Authors:  E Muchtar; A Dispenzieri; S K Kumar; R P Ketterling; D Dingli; M Q Lacy; F K Buadi; S R Hayman; P Kapoor; N Leung; R Chakraborty; W Gonsalves; R Warsame; T V Kourelis; S Russell; J A Lust; Y Lin; R S Go; S Zeldenrust; R A Kyle; S V Rajkumar; M A Gertz
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Translocation t(11;14) is associated with adverse outcome in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis when treated with bortezomib-based regimens.

Authors:  Tilmann Bochtler; Ute Hegenbart; Christina Kunz; Martin Granzow; Axel Benner; Anja Seckinger; Christoph Kimmich; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Anthony D Ho; Dirk Hose; Anna Jauch; Stefan O Schönland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors:  Antonio Palumbo; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Stefania Oliva; Henk M Lokhorst; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Laura Rosinol; Paul Richardson; Simona Caltagirone; Juan José Lahuerta; Thierry Facon; Sara Bringhen; Francesca Gay; Michel Attal; Roberto Passera; Andrew Spencer; Massimo Offidani; Shaji Kumar; Pellegrino Musto; Sagar Lonial; Maria T Petrucci; Robert Z Orlowski; Elena Zamagni; Gareth Morgan; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Brian G M Durie; Kenneth C Anderson; Pieter Sonneveld; Jésus San Miguel; Michele Cavo; S Vincent Rajkumar; Philippe Moreau
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  The use of Imatinib resistance mutation analysis to direct therapy in Philadelphia chromosome/BCR-ABL1 positive chronic myeloid leukaemia patients failing Imatinib treatment, in Patan Hospital, Nepal.

Authors:  Gyan K Kayastha; Nora Ranjitkar; Radha Gurung; Raj Kumar Kc; Sanjit Karki; Roshan Shrestha; Piyush Rajbhandari; Raj K Thapa; Buddhi Poudyal; Paras Acharya; David J Roberts; Bruce Hayes; Mark Zimmerman; Buddha Basnyat
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 7.  New investigational drugs with single-agent activity in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A M Rajan; S Kumar
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 11.037

  7 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis diagnosis and treatment algorithm 2021.

Authors:  M Hasib Sidiqi; Morie A Gertz
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 2.  Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis diagnosis and treatment algorithm 2018.

Authors:  Morie A Gertz
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 11.037

3.  Venetoclax induces deep hematologic remissions in t(11;14) relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis.

Authors:  Vikram J Premkumar; Suzanne Lentzsch; Samuel Pan; Divaya Bhutani; Joshua Richter; Sundar Jagannath; Michaela Liedtke; Arnaud Jaccard; Ashutosh D Wechalekar; Raymond Comenzo; Vaishali Sanchorawala; Bruno Royer; Michael Rosenzweig; Jason Valent; Stefan Schönland; Rafael Fonseca; Sandy Wong; Prashant Kapoor
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 11.037

4.  Analysis of the complete lambda light chain germline usage in patients with AL amyloidosis and dominant heart or kidney involvement.

Authors:  Natalie Berghaus; Sarah Schreiner; Martin Granzow; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Ute Hegenbart; Stefan O Schönland; Stefanie Huhn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.