| Literature DB >> 27904139 |
E Muchtar1, A Dispenzieri1, S K Kumar1, R P Ketterling2, D Dingli1, M Q Lacy1, F K Buadi1, S R Hayman1, P Kapoor1, N Leung1,3, R Chakraborty1,4, W Gonsalves1, R Warsame1, T V Kourelis1, S Russell1, J A Lust1, Y Lin1, R S Go1, S Zeldenrust1, R A Kyle1, S V Rajkumar1, M A Gertz1.
Abstract
The significance of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) by regimen type was assessed in 692 immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis patients with iFISH at diagnosis. First-line treatment was categorized as stem cell transplant and three non-transplant regimens. The most common abnormality was t(11;14) (49% of patients) followed by monosomy 13/del(13q) (36%) and trisomies (26%). A lower rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better was observed in patients with t(11;14) treated with bortezomib-based (52% vs 77%; P=0.004) and IMiD-based regimens (13% vs 54%; P=0.04) compared with those lacking t(11;14). This corresponded to an inferior overall survival (OS) in t(11;14)-positive bortezomib-treated (median 15 vs 27 months; P=0.05) and IMiD-treated patients (median 12 vs 32 months; P=0.05). The inferior OS associated with t(11;14) bortezomib-treated patients was restricted to patients with favorable disease. Trisomies were associated with a shorter OS (median 29 vs 69 months; P=0.001), reaching statistical significance only for melphalan (median 15 vs 32 months; P=0.02). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent survival impact for trisomies in the entire cohort and for t(11;14) among bortezomib-treated patients. iFISH is prognostic in untreated AL amyloidosis and may influence treatment selection. Patients with t(11;14) should be considered for ASCT or standard-dose melphalan at diagnosis because the survival disadvantage may be abrogated.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27904139 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leukemia ISSN: 0887-6924 Impact factor: 11.528