Literature DB >> 29136154

The number of oocytes retrieved during IVF: a balance between efficacy and safety.

Åsa Magnusson1, Karin Källen2, Ann Thurin-Kjellberg1, Christina Bergh1.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What is the relationship between the number of oocytes collected in fresh IVF treatments and the likelihood of cumulative delivery rate (fresh and frozen) per oocyte aspiration, severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and thromboembolic events? SUMMARY ANSWER: Cumulative delivery rate per aspiration increases up to 20 oocytes retrieved and then evens out while the incidence of severe OHSS increases more rapidly from around 18 oocytes and thromboembolic events, although rare, occurs in particular if 15 or more oocytes are retrieved. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?: Previous studies have shown that the number of oocytes retrieved for IVF is a positive predictor of live birth in fresh cycles. Few studies have investigated cumulative live birth rates and OHSS in relation to the number of aspirated oocytes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective population-based registry study including 39 387 women undergoing 77 956 fresh IVF cycles in the period 2007-2013 and 36 270 consecutive transfers of frozen/thawed embryos in the period 2007-2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Data from The Swedish National Quality Registry of Assisted Reproduction (Q-IVF) including all IVF cycles with oocyte retrieval performed in public or private infertility clinics during the study period, was cross-linked to the National Patient Register regarding diagnostic codes (ICD 10) for severe (OHSS) and thromboembolic events. Oocyte donation cycles were excluded. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Live birth delivery rate in fresh cycles increased up to 11 oocytes retrieved and then evened out, where the live birth rate was 30.3% for a 34-year-old woman. The cumulative delivery rate per aspiration, including fresh transfer and all subsequent transfers of frozen-thawed embryos (FET cycles) per oocyte retrieval, increased up to approximately 20 oocytes where it reached 45.8%. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for live birth by the number of oocytes was 1.064 (95% CI: 1.061; 1.067). The incidence of severe OHSS increased significantly by the number of oocytes, particularly if more than 18 oocytes were retrieved. The AOR for OHSS by the number of oocytes was 1.122 (95% CI: 1.08; 1.137). Thromboembolic events were rare, a total of 16 events in 14 patients were observed, and occurred in particular if 15 or more oocytes were retrieved. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: All FET cycles might not be included. Some embryos cryopreserved between 2010 and 2013 might still result in additional births until 2018. Furthermore the gonadotrophin dose was not included in the Q-IVF Registry in the study period, thus adjustment for dose was not possible. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The results suggest a shift at approximately 18-20 oocytes where the cumulative delivery rate per aspiration levels off and, at the same time, the incidence of severe OHSS increases more rapidly. Thromboembolic events, although rare, should also be taken into consideration at stimulation regimes for IVF. Evaluating data taking both efficacy and the most serious safety aspects into account, is a new approach and of crucial importance both for patients undergoing IVF and their physicians. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST: Financial support was received through an agreement relating to research and the education of doctors (ALFGBG-70 940) and grant from the Hjalmar Svensson Research Foundation. None of the authors declares any conflict of interest.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF outcome; OHSS; cumulative delivery rate; ovarian stimulation; thromboembolic events

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29136154     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  30 in total

1.  Can Ratios Between Prognostic Factors Predict the Clinical Pregnancy Rate in an IVF/ICSI Program with a GnRH Agonist-FSH/hMG Protocol? An Assessment of 2421 Embryo Transfers, and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Philippe Merviel; Michel Menard; Rosalie Cabry; Florence Scheffler; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Marie-Thérèse Le Martelot; Sylvie Roche; Jean-Jacques Chabaud; Henri Copin; Hortense Drapier; Moncef Benkhalifa; Damien Beauvillard
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  Can polymorphisms of AMH/AMHR2 affect ovarian stimulation outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Di Chen; Xiangyu Zhu; Jielei Wu
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.234

3.  Second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle: an option to fully-personalize the treatment in poor prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A.

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Gianluca Gennarelli; Maurizio Guido; Carlo Alviggi; Alessandro Conforti; Claudia Livi; Alberto Revelli; Silvia Colamaria; Cindy Argento; Maddalena Giuliani; Carlo De Angelis; Maria Matteo; Stefano Canosa; Angela D'Alfonso; Valentino Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  AMH-based ovarian stimulation versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Cui; Yonghong Lin; Jinli Lin; Fang Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Effect of oocyte donor stimulation on recipient outcomes: data from a US national donor oocyte bank.

Authors:  H S Hipp; A J Gaskins; Z P Nagy; S M Capelouto; D B Shapiro; J B Spencer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Optimal Oocyte Number in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist/Antagonist and Day 3 Fresh Embryo Transfer.

Authors:  Hoon Kim; Soo Jin Han; Yun Soo Hong; Sung Woo Kim; Seung-Yup Ku; Chang Suk Suh; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.060

7.  A mathematical model for predicting the number of transferable blastocysts in next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Yunni Cai; Min Ding; YuTing Zhang; Yanxin Sun; Fei Lin; Zhenyu Diao; Jianjun Zhou
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  Predicting the Likelihood of Live Birth in Assisted Reproductive Technology According to the Number of Oocytes Retrieved and Female Age Using a Generalized Additive Model: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 17,948 Cycles.

Authors:  Haiyan Zhu; Chenqiong Zhao; Peiwen Xiao; Songying Zhang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Clinical and perinatal outcomes of fresh single-blastocyst-transfer cycles under an early follicular phase prolonged protocol according to day of trigger estradiol levels.

Authors:  Yingfen Ying; Xiaosheng Lu; Huina Zhang; Samuel Kofi Arhin; Xiaohong Hou; Zefan Wang; Han Wu; Jieqiang Lu; Yunbing Tang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Effects of immediate versus delayed frozen embryo transfer in high responder patients undergoing freeze-all cycles.

Authors:  Na Zuo; Yingzhuo Gao; Ningning Zhang; Da Li; Xiuxia Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.