Sara Lodi1, Huldrych F Günthard2,3, David Dunn4, Federico Garcia5, Roger Logan1, Sophie Jose4, Heiner C Bucher6, Alexandra U Scherrer2,3, Marie-Paule Schneider7,8, Matthias Egger9, Tracy R Glass10,11, Peter Reiss12,13,14, Ard van Sighem12, T Sonia Boender12, Andrew N Phillips4, Kholoud Porter4, David Hawkins15, Santiago Moreno16,17, Susana Monge17,18, Dimitrios Paraskevis19, Metallidis Simeon20, Georgia Vourli19, Caroline Sabin4, Miguel A Hernán1,21. 1. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich. 3. Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 4. University College London, London, UK. 5. Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain. 6. Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel. 7. Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne. 8. Community Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva. 9. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern. 10. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute. 11. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 12. Stichting HIV Monitoring. 13. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam. 14. Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 15. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK. 16. IRYCIS, Ramón y Cajal Hospital. 17. University of Alcalá de Henares. 18. National Centre of Epidemiology - ISCIII, Madrid, Spain. 19. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens. 20. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. 21. Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We estimated and compared the risk of clinically identified acquired drug resistance under immediate initiation [the currently recommended antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation strategy], initiation with CD4 cell count less than 500 cells/μl and initiation with CD4 cell count less than 350 cells/μl. DESIGN: Cohort study based on routinely collected data from the HIV-CAUSAL collaboration. METHODS: For each individual, baseline was the earliest time when all eligibility criteria (ART-naive, AIDS free, and others) were met after 1999. Acquired drug resistance was defined using the Stanford classification as resistance to any antiretroviral drug that was clinically identified at least 6 months after ART initiation. We used the parametric g-formula to adjust for time-varying (CD4 cell count, HIV RNA, AIDS, ART regimen, and drug resistance testing) and baseline (calendar period, mode of acquisition, sex, age, geographical origin, ethnicity and cohort) characteristics. RESULTS: In 50 981 eligible individuals, 10% had CD4 cell count more than 500 cells/μl at baseline, and 63% initiated ART during follow-up. Of 2672 tests for acquired drug resistance, 794 found resistance. The estimated 7-year risk (95% confidence interval) of acquired drug resistance was 3.2% (2.8,3.5) for immediate initiation, 3.1% (2.7,3.3) for initiation with CD4 cell count less than 500 cells/μl, and 2.8% (2.5,3.0) for initiation with CD4 cell count less than 350 cells/μl. In analyses restricted to individuals with baseline in 2005-2015, the corresponding estimates were 1.9% (1.8, 2.5), 1.9% (1.7, 2.4), and 1.8% (1.7, 2.2). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the risk of acquired drug resistance is very low, especially in recent calendar periods, and that immediate ART initiation only slightly increases the risk. It is unlikely that drug resistance will jeopardize the proven benefits of immediate ART initiation.
OBJECTIVE: We estimated and compared the risk of clinically identified acquired drug resistance under immediate initiation [the currently recommended antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation strategy], initiation with CD4 cell count less than 500 cells/μl and initiation with CD4 cell count less than 350 cells/μl. DESIGN: Cohort study based on routinely collected data from the HIV-CAUSAL collaboration. METHODS: For each individual, baseline was the earliest time when all eligibility criteria (ART-naive, AIDS free, and others) were met after 1999. Acquired drug resistance was defined using the Stanford classification as resistance to any antiretroviral drug that was clinically identified at least 6 months after ART initiation. We used the parametric g-formula to adjust for time-varying (CD4 cell count, HIV RNA, AIDS, ART regimen, and drug resistance testing) and baseline (calendar period, mode of acquisition, sex, age, geographical origin, ethnicity and cohort) characteristics. RESULTS: In 50 981 eligible individuals, 10% had CD4 cell count more than 500 cells/μl at baseline, and 63% initiated ART during follow-up. Of 2672 tests for acquired drug resistance, 794 found resistance. The estimated 7-year risk (95% confidence interval) of acquired drug resistance was 3.2% (2.8,3.5) for immediate initiation, 3.1% (2.7,3.3) for initiation with CD4 cell count less than 500 cells/μl, and 2.8% (2.5,3.0) for initiation with CD4 cell count less than 350 cells/μl. In analyses restricted to individuals with baseline in 2005-2015, the corresponding estimates were 1.9% (1.8, 2.5), 1.9% (1.7, 2.4), and 1.8% (1.7, 2.2). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the risk of acquired drug resistance is very low, especially in recent calendar periods, and that immediate ART initiation only slightly increases the risk. It is unlikely that drug resistance will jeopardize the proven benefits of immediate ART initiation.
Authors: Alexandra U Scherrer; Viktor von Wyl; Wan-Lin Yang; Roger D Kouyos; Jürg Böni; Sabine Yerly; Thomas Klimkait; Vincent Aubert; Matthias Cavassini; Manuel Battegay; Hansjakob Furrer; Alexandra Calmy; Pietro Vernazza; Enos Bernasconi; Huldrych F Günthard; V Aubert; M Battegay; E Bernasconi; J Böni; D L Braun; H C Bucher; C Burton-Jeangros; A Calmy; M Cavassini; G Dollenmaier; M Egger; L Elzi; J Fehr; J Fellay; H Furrer; C A Fux; M Gorgievski; H Günthard; D Haerry; B Hasse; H H Hirsch; M Hoffmann; I Hösli; C Kahlert; L Kaiser; O Keiser; T Klimkait; R Kouyos; H Kovari; B Ledergerber; G Martinetti; B Martinez de Tejada; C Marzolini; K Metzner; N Müller; D Nadal; D Nicca; G Pantaleo; A Rauch; S Regenass; C Rudin; F Schöni-Affolter; P Schmid; R Speck; M Stöckle; P Tarr; A Trkola; P Vernazza; R Weber; S Yerly Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jens D Lundgren; Abdel G Babiker; Fred Gordin; Sean Emery; Birgit Grund; Shweta Sharma; Anchalee Avihingsanon; David A Cooper; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Josep M Llibre; Jean-Michel Molina; Paula Munderi; Mauro Schechter; Robin Wood; Karin L Klingman; Simon Collins; H Clifford Lane; Andrew N Phillips; James D Neaton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: W M El-Sadr; J D Lundgren; J D Neaton; F Gordin; D Abrams; R C Arduino; A Babiker; W Burman; N Clumeck; C J Cohen; D Cohn; D Cooper; J Darbyshire; S Emery; G Fätkenheuer; B Gazzard; B Grund; J Hoy; K Klingman; M Losso; N Markowitz; J Neuhaus; A Phillips; C Rappoport Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-11-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lauren E Cain; Roger Logan; James M Robins; Jonathan A C Sterne; Caroline Sabin; Loveleen Bansi; Amy Justice; Joseph Goulet; Ard van Sighem; Frank de Wolf; Heiner C Bucher; Viktor von Wyl; Anna Esteve; Jordi Casabona; Julia del Amo; Santiago Moreno; Remonie Seng; Laurence Meyer; Santiago Perez-Hoyos; Roberto Muga; Sara Lodi; Emilie Lanoy; Dominique Costagliola; Miguel A Hernan Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-04-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Viktor von Wyl; Thomas Klimkait; Sabine Yerly; Dunja Nicca; Hansjakob Furrer; Matthias Cavassini; Alexandra Calmy; Enos Bernasconi; Jürg Böni; Vincent Aubert; Huldrych F Günthard; Heiner C Bucher; Tracy R Glass Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sara Lodi; Andrew Phillips; Sarah Fidler; David Hawkins; Richard Gilson; Ken McLean; Martin Fisher; Frank Post; Anne M Johnson; Louise Walker-Nthenda; David Dunn; Kholoud Porter Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ellen C Caniglia; James M Robins; Lauren E Cain; Caroline Sabin; Roger Logan; Sophie Abgrall; Michael J Mugavero; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Laurence Meyer; Remonie Seng; Daniel R Drozd; George R Seage Iii; Fabrice Bonnet; Fabien Le Marec; Richard D Moore; Peter Reiss; Ard van Sighem; William C Mathews; Inma Jarrín; Belén Alejos; Steven G Deeks; Roberto Muga; Stephen L Boswell; Elena Ferrer; Joseph J Eron; John Gill; Antonio Pacheco; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Sonia Napravnik; Sophie Jose; Andrew Phillips; Amy Justice; Janet Tate; Heiner C Bucher; Matthias Egger; Hansjakob Furrer; Jose M Miro; Jordi Casabona; Kholoud Porter; Giota Touloumi; Heidi Crane; Dominique Costagliola; Michael Saag; Miguel A Hernán Journal: Stat Med Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Sarah C Conner; Sara Lodi; Kathryn L Lunetta; Juan P Casas; Steven A Lubitz; Patrick T Ellinor; Christopher D Anderson; Qiuxi Huang; Justin Coleman; Wendy B White; Emelia J Benjamin; Ludovic Trinquart Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Soo-Yon Rhee; Dana Clutter; C Bradley Hare; Christophe T Tchakoute; Kristin Sainani; W Jeffrey Fessel; Leo Hurley; Sally Slome; Benjamin A Pinsky; Michael J Silverberg; Robert W Shafer Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Tamara Sonia Boender; Colette Smit; Ard van Sighem; Daniela Bezemer; Catriona J Ester; Sima Zaheri; Ferdinand W N M Wit; Peter Reiss Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 2.692