BACKGROUND: Most clinical guidelines recommend that AIDS-free, HIV-infected persons with CD4 cell counts below 0.350 × 10(9) cells/L initiate combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), but the optimal CD4 cell count at which cART should be initiated remains a matter of debate. OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal CD4 cell count at which cART should be initiated. DESIGN: Prospective observational data from the HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration and dynamic marginal structural models were used to compare cART initiation strategies for CD4 thresholds between 0.200 and 0.500 × 10(9) cells/L. SETTING: HIV clinics in Europe and the Veterans Health Administration system in the United States. PATIENTS: 20, 971 HIV-infected, therapy-naive persons with baseline CD4 cell counts at or above 0.500 × 10(9) cells/L and no previous AIDS-defining illnesses, of whom 8392 had a CD4 cell count that decreased into the range of 0.200 to 0.499 × 10(9) cells/L and were included in the analysis. MEASUREMENTS: Hazard ratios and survival proportions for all-cause mortality and a combined end point of AIDS-defining illness or death. RESULTS: Compared with initiating cART at the CD4 cell count threshold of 0.500 × 10(9) cells/L, the mortality hazard ratio was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.22) for the 0.350 threshold and 1.20 (CI, 0.97 to 1.48) for the 0.200 threshold. The corresponding hazard ratios were 1.38 (CI, 1.23 to 1.56) and 1.90 (CI, 1.67 to 2.15), respectively, for the combined end point of AIDS-defining illness or death. LIMITATIONS: CD4 cell count at cART initiation was not randomized. Residual confounding may exist. CONCLUSION: Initiation of cART at a threshold CD4 count of 0.500 × 10(9) cells/L increases AIDS-free survival. However, mortality did not vary substantially with the use of CD4 thresholds between 0.300 and 0.500 × 10(9) cells/L.
BACKGROUND: Most clinical guidelines recommend that AIDS-free, HIV-infected persons with CD4 cell counts below 0.350 × 10(9) cells/L initiate combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), but the optimal CD4 cell count at which cART should be initiated remains a matter of debate. OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal CD4 cell count at which cART should be initiated. DESIGN: Prospective observational data from the HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration and dynamic marginal structural models were used to compare cART initiation strategies for CD4 thresholds between 0.200 and 0.500 × 10(9) cells/L. SETTING: HIV clinics in Europe and the Veterans Health Administration system in the United States. PATIENTS: 20, 971 HIV-infected, therapy-naive persons with baseline CD4 cell counts at or above 0.500 × 10(9) cells/L and no previous AIDS-defining illnesses, of whom 8392 had a CD4 cell count that decreased into the range of 0.200 to 0.499 × 10(9) cells/L and were included in the analysis. MEASUREMENTS: Hazard ratios and survival proportions for all-cause mortality and a combined end point of AIDS-defining illness or death. RESULTS: Compared with initiating cART at the CD4 cell count threshold of 0.500 × 10(9) cells/L, the mortality hazard ratio was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.22) for the 0.350 threshold and 1.20 (CI, 0.97 to 1.48) for the 0.200 threshold. The corresponding hazard ratios were 1.38 (CI, 1.23 to 1.56) and 1.90 (CI, 1.67 to 2.15), respectively, for the combined end point of AIDS-defining illness or death. LIMITATIONS: CD4 cell count at cART initiation was not randomized. Residual confounding may exist. CONCLUSION: Initiation of cART at a threshold CD4 count of 0.500 × 10(9) cells/L increases AIDS-free survival. However, mortality did not vary substantially with the use of CD4 thresholds between 0.300 and 0.500 × 10(9) cells/L.
Authors: Jonathan A C Sterne; Miguel A Hernán; Bruno Ledergerber; Kate Tilling; Rainer Weber; Pedram Sendi; Martin Rickenbach; James M Robins; Matthias Egger Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jul 30-Aug 5 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: D W Cameron; M Heath-Chiozzi; S Danner; C Cohen; S Kravcik; C Maurath; E Sun; D Henry; R Rode; A Potthoff; J Leonard Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-02-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rainer Weber; Caroline A Sabin; Nina Friis-Møller; Peter Reiss; Wafaa M El-Sadr; Ole Kirk; Francois Dabis; Matthew G Law; Christian Pradier; Stephane De Wit; Börje Akerlund; Gonzalo Calvo; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Martin Rickenbach; Bruno Ledergerber; Andrew N Phillips; Jens D Lundgren Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006 Aug 14-28
Authors: S M Hammer; K E Squires; M D Hughes; J M Grimes; L M Demeter; J S Currier; J J Eron; J E Feinberg; H H Balfour; L R Deyton; J A Chodakewitz; M A Fischl Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-09-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Melanie A Thompson; Judith A Aberg; Pedro Cahn; Julio S G Montaner; Giuliano Rizzardini; Amalio Telenti; José M Gatell; Huldrych F Günthard; Scott M Hammer; Martin S Hirsch; Donna M Jacobsen; Peter Reiss; Douglas D Richman; Paul A Volberding; Patrick Yeni; Robert T Schooley Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Linda Beer; Jennifer L Fagan; Pamela Garland; Eduardo E Valverde; Barbara Bolden; Kathleen A Brady; Maria Courogen; Daniel Hillman; Alan Neaigus; Jeanne Bertolli Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Sara Lodi; Andrew Phillips; Roger Logan; Ashley Olson; Dominique Costagliola; Sophie Abgrall; Ard van Sighem; Peter Reiss; José M Miró; Elena Ferrer; Amy Justice; Neel Gandhi; Heiner C Bucher; Hansjakob Furrer; Santiago Moreno; Susana Monge; Giota Touloumi; Nikos Pantazis; Jonathan Sterne; Jessica G Young; Laurence Meyer; Rémonie Seng; Francois Dabis; Marie-Anne Vandehende; Santiago Pérez-Hoyos; Inma Jarrín; Sophie Jose; Caroline Sabin; Miguel A Hernán Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Rochelle P Walensky; Eric L Ross; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; Robin Wood; Farzad Noubary; A David Paltiel; Yoriko M Nakamura; Sheela V Godbole; Ravindre Panchia; Ian Sanne; Milton C Weinstein; Elena Losina; Kenneth H Mayer; Ying Q Chen; Lei Wang; Marybeth McCauley; Theresa Gamble; George R Seage; Myron S Cohen; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jessie K Edwards; Stephen R Cole; Daniel Westreich; Michael J Mugavero; Joseph J Eron; Richard D Moore; William C Mathews; Peter Hunt; Carolyn Williams Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 9.079