Maryam Ghashghaei1,2, Tamim M Niazi1,2,3, Mitra Heravi1, Hamed Bekerat3, Mark Trifiro1,4, Miltiadis Paliouras1,2, Thierry Muanza1,2,3. 1. Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2. Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Quebec, Canada. 4. Division of Endocrinology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a progressive disease and the most diagnosed cancer in men. The current standard of care for high-risk localized PCa is a combination of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation (XRT). The majority of these patients however become resistant due to incomplete responses to ADT as a result of selective cells maintaining androgen receptor (AR) activity. Improvement can be made if increasing radiosensitivity is realized. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of the next-generation PCa drug Enzalutamide (ENZA), as a radiosensitizer in XRT therapy. METHODS: Using a number of androgen-dependent (LNCaP, PC3-T877A) and androgen-independent (C4-2, 22RV1, PC3, PC3-AR V7) cell lines, the effect of ENZA as a radiosensitizer was studied alone or in combination with ADT and/or XRT. Cell viability and cell survival were assessed, along with determination of cell cycle arrest, DNA damage response and repair, apoptosis and senescence. RESULTS: Our results indicated that either ENZA alone (in AR positive, androgen-dependent PCa cells) or in combination with ADT (in AR positive, hormone-insensitive PCa cells) potentiates radiation response [Dose enhancement factor (DEF) of 1.75 in LNCAP and 1.35 in C4-2] stronger than ADT + XRT conditions. Additionally, ENZA sensitized androgen dependent PCa cells to XRT in a schedule-dependent manner, where concurrent administration of ENZA and radiation lead to a maximal radiosensitization when compared to either drug administration prior or after XRT. In LNCaP cells, ENZA treatment significantly prolonged the presence of XRT-induced phospho-γH2AX up to 24 h after treatment; suggesting enhanced DNA damage. It also significantly increased XRT-induced apoptosis and senescence. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicates that ENZA acts as a much stronger radiosensitizer compared to ADT. We have also observed that its efficacy is schedule dependent and related to increased levels of DNA damage and a delay of DNA repair processes. Finally, the initial abrogation of DNA-PKcs activity by AR inhibition and its subsequent recovery might represent an important mechanism by which PCa cells acquire resistance to combined anti-androgen and XRT treatment. This work suggests a new use of ENZA in combination with XRT that could be applicable in clinical trial settings for patients with early and intermediate hormone responsive disease.
BACKGROUND:Prostate cancer (PCa) is a progressive disease and the most diagnosed cancer in men. The current standard of care for high-risk localized PCa is a combination of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation (XRT). The majority of these patients however become resistant due to incomplete responses to ADT as a result of selective cells maintaining androgen receptor (AR) activity. Improvement can be made if increasing radiosensitivity is realized. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of the next-generation PCa drug Enzalutamide (ENZA), as a radiosensitizer in XRT therapy. METHODS: Using a number of androgen-dependent (LNCaP, PC3-T877A) and androgen-independent (C4-2, 22RV1, PC3, PC3-AR V7) cell lines, the effect of ENZA as a radiosensitizer was studied alone or in combination with ADT and/or XRT. Cell viability and cell survival were assessed, along with determination of cell cycle arrest, DNA damage response and repair, apoptosis and senescence. RESULTS: Our results indicated that either ENZA alone (in AR positive, androgen-dependent PCa cells) or in combination with ADT (in AR positive, hormone-insensitive PCa cells) potentiates radiation response [Dose enhancement factor (DEF) of 1.75 in LNCAP and 1.35 in C4-2] stronger than ADT + XRT conditions. Additionally, ENZA sensitized androgen dependent PCa cells to XRT in a schedule-dependent manner, where concurrent administration of ENZA and radiation lead to a maximal radiosensitization when compared to either drug administration prior or after XRT. In LNCaP cells, ENZA treatment significantly prolonged the presence of XRT-induced phospho-γH2AX up to 24 h after treatment; suggesting enhanced DNA damage. It also significantly increased XRT-induced apoptosis and senescence. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicates that ENZA acts as a much stronger radiosensitizer compared to ADT. We have also observed that its efficacy is schedule dependent and related to increased levels of DNA damage and a delay of DNA repair processes. Finally, the initial abrogation of DNA-PKcs activity by AR inhibition and its subsequent recovery might represent an important mechanism by which PCa cells acquire resistance to combined anti-androgen and XRT treatment. This work suggests a new use of ENZA in combination with XRT that could be applicable in clinical trial settings for patients with early and intermediate hormone responsive disease.
Authors: Marta Barrado; Idoia Blanco-Luquin; Paola Andrea Navarrete; Ignacio Visus; David Guerrero-Setas; David Escors; Grazyna Kochan; Fernando Arias Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2019-02-22
Authors: Christos Kakouratos; Dimitra Kalamida; Ioannis Lamprou; Erasmia Xanthopoulou; Christos Nanos; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Michael I Koukourakis Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 9.075
Authors: Nicolas Malaquin; Arthur Vancayseele; Sophie Gilbert; Laureen Antenor-Habazac; Marc-Alexandre Olivier; Zakia Ait Ali Brahem; Fred Saad; Guila Delouya; Francis Rodier Journal: Cells Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Roche Kapoor; Matthew P Deek; Riley McIntyre; Natasha Raman; Megan Kummerlowe; Iyah Chen; Matt Gaver; Hao Wang; Sam Denmeade; Tamara Lotan; Channing Paller; Mark Markowski; Michael Carducci; Mario Eisenberger; Tomasz M Beer; Daniel Y Song; Theodore L DeWeese; Jason W Hearn; Stephen Greco; Curtiland DeVille; Neil B Desai; Elisabeth I Heath; Stanley Liauw; Daniel E Spratt; Arthur Y Hung; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Phuoc T Tran Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Katharina Lückerath; Liu Wei; Wolfgang P Fendler; Susan Evans-Axelsson; Andreea D Stuparu; Roger Slavik; Christine E Mona; Jeremie Calais; Matthew Rettig; Robert E Reiter; Ken Herrmann; Caius G Radu; Johannes Czernin; Matthias Eiber Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 3.138