Literature DB >> 2913461

The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.

M S Weldon, H L Roediger, B H Challis.   

Abstract

In three experiments, we examined why pictures are remembered better than words on explicit memory tests like recall and recognition, whereas words produce more priming than pictures on some implicit tests, such as word-fragment and word-stem completion (e.g., completing -l-ph-nt or ele----- as elephant). One possibility is that pictures are always more accessible than words if subjects are given explicit retrieval instructions. An alternative possibility is that the properties of the retrieval cues themselves constrain the retrieval processes engaged; word fragments might induce data-driven (perceptually based) retrieval, which favors words regardless of the retrieval instructions. Experiment 1 demonstrated that words were remembered better than pictures on both the word-fragment and word-stem completion tasks under both implicit and explicit retrieval conditions. In Experiment 2, pictures were recalled better than words with semantically related extralist cues. In Experiment 3, when semantic cues were combined with word fragments, pictures and words were recalled equally well under explicit retrieval conditions, but words were superior to pictures under implicit instructions. Thus, the inherently data-limited properties of fragmented words limit their use in accessing conceptual codes. Overall, the results indicate that retrieval operations are largely determined by properties of the retrieval cues under both implicit and explicit retrieval conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2913461     DOI: 10.3758/bf03199561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Time to understand pictures and words.

Authors:  M C Potter; B A Faulconer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Levels of processing and picture memory: the physical superiority effect.

Authors:  H Intraub; S Nicklos
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.

Authors:  D L Nelson; J J Canas; M T Bajo; P D Keelean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect.

Authors:  M S Weldon; H L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-07

5.  The effects of priming on picture recognition.

Authors:  C Warren; J Morton
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1982-02

6.  Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.

Authors:  M C Smith; L E Magee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12

7.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

8.  Strength and duration of priming effects in normal subjects and amnesic patients.

Authors:  L R Squire; A P Shimamura; P Graf
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.

Authors:  L L Jacoby; M Dallas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1981-09
  9 in total
  17 in total

1.  Direct comparison of auditory implicit memory tests.

Authors:  M Pilotti; E T Bergman; D A Gallo; M Sommers; H L Roediger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

2.  Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition.

Authors:  Deanne L Westerman; Jeremy K Miller; Marianne E Lloyd
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

3.  Preserved conceptual implicit memory for pictures in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Rebecca G Deason; Erin P Hussey; Sean Flannery; Brandon A Ally
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Reversing the picture superiority effect: a speed-accuracy trade-off study of recognition memory.

Authors:  Angela Boldini; Riccardo Russo; Sahiba Punia; S E Avons
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

5.  The picture superiority effect in associative recognition.

Authors:  William E Hockley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

6.  An auditory analog of the picture superiority effect.

Authors:  Robert J Crutcher; Jenay M Beer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

7.  Prospective remembering: perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes?

Authors:  M A McDaniel; B Robinson-Riegler; G O Einstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

8.  High-priority event instructions affect implicit and explicit memory tests.

Authors:  M J Guynn; H L Roediger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1995

9.  Priming on verbal perceptual tests: roles of lexical, surface, and conceptual processes.

Authors:  W Wippich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1995

10.  Why do pictures produce priming on the word-fragment completion test? A study of encoding and retrieval factors.

Authors:  M S Weldon; J L Jackson-Barrett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.