Literature DB >> 29134243

[Implants for genital prolapse : Pro mesh surgery].

J Neymeyer1,2, D-E Moldovan3, K Kornienko3, K Miller3, A Weichert3.   

Abstract

There has been an overall increase in pelvic organ prolapse due to demographic changes (increased life expectancy). Increasing sociocultural demands of women require treatments that are more effective with methods that are more successful. In the treatment of pelvic floor insufficiency and uterovaginal prolapse, pelvic floor reconstructions with mesh implants have proven to be superior to conventional methods such as the classic colporrhaphy, reconstructions with biomaterial, and native tissue repair in appropriately selected patients and when applying exact operation techniques, especially because of good long-term results and low recurrence rates. When making a systematic therapy plan, one should adhere to certain steps, for example, a pelvic floor reconstruction should be undertaken before performing the corrective procedure for incontinence. The approach, if vaginal, laparoscopic, or abdominal should be chosen wisely, taking into consideration the required space of action, in such a way that none or only minimal collateral damage related to the operation occurs. The use of instrumental suturing techniques and operation robots are advantageous in the case of difficult approaches and limited anatomical spaces. In principle, the surgeon who implants meshes should be able to explant them! The surgical concept of mesh-related interventions in the pelvis must meet established rules. "Implant as little mesh as possible and only as much suitable (!) mesh as absolutely necessary!" In the case of apical direct fixations, a therapeutically relevant target variable is the elevation angle of vagina (EAV). Established anatomical fixation points are preferable. A safe distance between implants and vulnerable tissue is to be maintained. Mesh-based prolapse repairs are indicated in recurrences, in primary situations, in combined defects of the anterior compartment, in central defects of multimorbid and elderly patients, and above all, when organ preservation is wanted. Native connective tissue structures are to be preserved, strengthened and reconstructed to restore altered functions. Practical skills for highly specialized mesh-based operations as well as effective techniques for complication management should be taught in interdisciplinary specialist courses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Descensus; Elevation angle of vagina (EAV); Mesh; Sacropexy; Triplefixation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29134243     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0540-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  10 in total

1.  Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: "UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse".

Authors:  Miles Murphy; Adam Holzberg; Heather van Raalte; Neeraj Kohli; Howard B Goldman; Vincent Lucente
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Long-term outcomes of TVT and IVS operations for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: monofilament vs. multifilament polypropylene tape.

Authors:  Jens Christian Prien-Larsen; Lars Hemmingsen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-10

3.  Words of wisdom. Re: FDA public health notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Firouz Daneshgari
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  TVT vs. TOT: a comparison in terms of continence results, complications and quality of life after a median follow-up of 48 months.

Authors:  Vahudin Zugor; Apostolos P Labanaris; Mohammad-Reza Rezaei-Jafari; Peter Hammerer; Joachim Dembowski; Jörn Witt; Wigand Wucherpfennig
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Different surgical approaches for stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  J Mischinger; B Amend; C Reisenauer; J Bedke; G Naumann; M Germann; S Kruck; L F Arenas Desilva; H Wallwiener; H Koelbl; V Nitti; K D Sievert
Journal:  Minerva Ginecol       Date:  2013-02

Review 6.  The investigation and treatment of female pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Katharina Jundt; Ursula Peschers; Heribert Kentenich
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Mesh erosion after pelvic reconstructive surgeries.

Authors:  Yan Ren; Li Hong; Xue-xian Xu; Xiao-ying Qi
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  A qualitative study of women's preferences for treatment of pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  M Basu; B Wise; J Duckett
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 9.  Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Corina Christmann-Schmid; Nir Haya; Jane Marjoribanks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-09

Review 10.  To mesh or not to mesh: a review of pelvic organ reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Patrick Dällenbach
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-04-01
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Function, quality-of-life and complications after sacrospinous ligament fixation using an antegrade reusable suturing device (ARSD-Ney) at 6 and 12 months: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Mingyue Li; Huating Sun; Liping Ni; Honghong Cai; Wen Fan; Jinhua Zhou; Juan Wang; Hongmei Ding; Youguo Chen; Fangrong Shen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.