Brandon J Manley1, Ed Reznik2, Mazyar Ghanaat1, Mahyar Kashan2, Maria F Becerra2, Jozefina Casuscelli3, Daniel Tennenbaum1, Almedina Redzematovic4, Maria I Carlo4, Yusuke Sato5, Maria Arcila6, Martin H Voss4, Darren R Feldman4, Robert J Motzer4, Paul Russo1, Jonathan Coleman1, James J Hsieh7, Ari A Hakimi8. 1. Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL. 2. Department of Medicine, Molecular Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 3. Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. 4. Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 5. Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 6. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 7. Department of Medicine, Molecular Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 8. Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL. Electronic address: hakimia@mskcc.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Small renal masses (SRMs) with evidence of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are understudied. Current algorithms for the management of SRMs include surgical resection, ablation, and active surveillance. We sought to identify genomic biomarkers that could potentially refine the management of ccRCC in SRMs, especially in patients being evaluated for active surveillance. METHODS: We identified patients who had SRMs (4cm or less) at time of surgery, had sequencing performed on their primary tumor and had a diagnosis of ccRCC. Patients were selected from 3 publicly available cohorts, The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 110), University of Tokyo (n = 37), The International Cancer Genome Consortium (n = 31), and from our own institutional prospective database (n = 25). Among this cohort we analyzed mutations present in at least 5% of tumors, assessing for the enrichment of mutations and progression-free survival using the composite endpoint of recurrence or death of disease. Analysis was adjusted for multiple testing. A Cox regression model was used to assess clinical variables with significant mutations. RESULTS: In total, 203 patients were available for analysis. Median follow-up was 43.1 months among survivors. Mutations in VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, BAP1, KDM5C, and MTOR were present in more than 5% of tumors. Twenty-three patients (11.3%) had recurrence or died of their disease. Mutations in KDM5C were associated with inferior survival from either recurrence or death from disease, adjusted P 0.033. CONCLUSIONS: We identified mutations in SRMs in ccRCC that are associated with recurrence and lethality. The strongest association was seen in those with KDM5C mutations. Use of these genomic biomarkers may improve stratification of patients with SRMs and for those who may be appropriate for active surveillance. Prospective evaluation of these markers is needed.
INTRODUCTION: Small renal masses (SRMs) with evidence of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are understudied. Current algorithms for the management of SRMs include surgical resection, ablation, and active surveillance. We sought to identify genomic biomarkers that could potentially refine the management of ccRCC in SRMs, especially in patients being evaluated for active surveillance. METHODS: We identified patients who had SRMs (4cm or less) at time of surgery, had sequencing performed on their primary tumor and had a diagnosis of ccRCC. Patients were selected from 3 publicly available cohorts, The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 110), University of Tokyo (n = 37), The International Cancer Genome Consortium (n = 31), and from our own institutional prospective database (n = 25). Among this cohort we analyzed mutations present in at least 5% of tumors, assessing for the enrichment of mutations and progression-free survival using the composite endpoint of recurrence or death of disease. Analysis was adjusted for multiple testing. A Cox regression model was used to assess clinical variables with significant mutations. RESULTS: In total, 203 patients were available for analysis. Median follow-up was 43.1 months among survivors. Mutations in VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, BAP1, KDM5C, and MTOR were present in more than 5% of tumors. Twenty-three patients (11.3%) had recurrence or died of their disease. Mutations in KDM5C were associated with inferior survival from either recurrence or death from disease, adjusted P 0.033. CONCLUSIONS: We identified mutations in SRMs in ccRCC that are associated with recurrence and lethality. The strongest association was seen in those with KDM5C mutations. Use of these genomic biomarkers may improve stratification of patients with SRMs and for those who may be appropriate for active surveillance. Prospective evaluation of these markers is needed.
Authors: Steven C Campbell; Andrew C Novick; Arie Belldegrun; Michael L Blute; George K Chow; Ithaar H Derweesh; Martha M Faraday; Jihad H Kaouk; Raymond J Leveillee; Surena F Matin; Paul Russo; Robert G Uzzo Journal: J Urol Date: 2009-08-14 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: A Ari Hakimi; Irina Ostrovnaya; Boris Reva; Nikolaus Schultz; Ying-Bei Chen; Mithat Gonen; Han Liu; Shugaku Takeda; Martin H Voss; Satish K Tickoo; Victor E Reuter; Paul Russo; Emily H Cheng; Chris Sander; Robert J Motzer; James J Hsieh Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: A Ari Hakimi; Ying-Bei Chen; James Wren; Mithat Gonen; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Adriana Heguy; Han Liu; Shugaku Takeda; Satish K Tickoo; Victor E Reuter; Martin H Voss; Robert J Motzer; Jonathan A Coleman; Emily H Cheng; Paul Russo; James J Hsieh Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Alexander Kutikov; Lindsay K Fossett; Parvati Ramchandani; John E Tomaszewski; Evan S Siegelman; Marc P Banner; Keith N Van Arsdalen; Alan J Wein; S Bruce Malkowicz Journal: Urology Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Anne-Michelle Noone; Kathleen A Cronin; Sean F Altekruse; Nadia Howlader; Denise R Lewis; Valentina I Petkov; Lynne Penberthy Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Marco Gerlinger; Andrew J Rowan; Stuart Horswell; James Larkin; David Endesfelder; Eva Gronroos; Pierre Martinez; Nicholas Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Charles Swanton; M Math; Patrick Tarpey; Ignacio Varela; Benjamin Phillimore; Sharmin Begum; Neil Q McDonald; Adam Butler; David Jones; Keiran Raine; Calli Latimer; Claudio R Santos; Mahrokh Nohadani; Aron C Eklund; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Graham Clark; Lisa Pickering; Gordon Stamp; Martin Gore; Zoltan Szallasi; Julian Downward; P Andrew Futreal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Wei Jiang; Essel Dulaimi; Karthik Devarajan; Theodore Parsons; Qiong Wang; Lili Liao; Eun-Ah Cho; Raymond O'Neill; Charalambos Solomides; Stephen C Peiper; Joseph R Testa; Robert Uzzo; Haifeng Yang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andrew W Silagy; Alejandro Sanchez; Brandon J Manley; Karim Bensalah; Axel Bex; Jose A Karam; Börje Ljungberg; Brian Shuch; A Ari Hakimi Journal: Eur Urol Focus Date: 2019-04-28
Authors: Roy Mano; Cihan Duzgol; Maz Ganat; Debra A Goldman; Kyle A Blum; Andrew W Silagy; Aleksandra Walasek; Alejandro Sanchez; Renzo G DiNatale; Julian Marcon; Mahyar Kashan; Maria F Becerra; Nicole E Benfante; Jonathan A Coleman; Michael W Kattan; Paul Russo; Oguz Akin; Irina Ostrovnaya; A Ari Hakimi Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2021-09-25 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Jee Soo Park; Hyo Jung Lee; Ahmad Almujalhem; Hatem Hamed Althubiany; Alqahatani Ali A; Won Sik Jang; Jongchan Kim; Seung Hwan Lee; Koon Ho Rha; Won Sik Ham Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 6.639