Priscilla E Springer1, Amy L Slogrove1,2, Barbara Laughton3, Julie A Bettinger4, Henriëtte H Saunders1, Christopher D Molteno5, Mariana Kruger1. 1. Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. 2. Ukwanda Centre for Rural Health, Worcester, South Africa. 3. Family Clinical Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. 4. Vaccine Evaluation Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare neurodevelopmental outcomes of HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) and HIV-unexposed uninfected (HUU) infants in a peri-urban South African population. HEU infants living in Africa face unique biological and environmental risks, but uncertainty remains regarding their neurodevelopmental outcome. This is partly due to lack of well-matched HUU comparison groups needed to adjust for confounding factors. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of infants enrolled at birth from a low-risk midwife obstetric facility. At 12 months of age, HEU and HUU infant growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes were compared. Growth was evaluated as WHO weight-for-age, length-for-age, weight-for-length and head-circumference-for-age Z-scores. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were evaluated using the Bayley scales of Infant Development III (BSID) and Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB). RESULTS: Fifty-eight HEU and 38 HUU infants were evaluated at 11-14 months of age. Performance on the BSID did not differ in any of the domains between HEU and HUU infants. The cognitive, language and motor scores were within the average range (US standardised norms). Seven (12%) HEU and 1 (2.6%) HUU infant showed social withdrawal on the ADBB (P = 0.10), while 15 (26%) HEU and 4 (11%) HUU infants showed decreased vocalisation (P = 0.06). There were no growth differences. Three HEU and one HUU infant had minor neurological signs, while eight HEU and two HUU infants had macrocephaly. CONCLUSIONS: Although findings on the early neurodevelopmental outcome of HEU infants are reassuring, minor differences in vocalisation and on neurological examination indicate a need for reassessment at a later age.
OBJECTIVES: To compare neurodevelopmental outcomes of HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) and HIV-unexposed uninfected (HUU) infants in a peri-urban South African population. HEU infants living in Africa face unique biological and environmental risks, but uncertainty remains regarding their neurodevelopmental outcome. This is partly due to lack of well-matched HUU comparison groups needed to adjust for confounding factors. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of infants enrolled at birth from a low-risk midwife obstetric facility. At 12 months of age, HEU and HUU infant growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes were compared. Growth was evaluated as WHO weight-for-age, length-for-age, weight-for-length and head-circumference-for-age Z-scores. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were evaluated using the Bayley scales of Infant Development III (BSID) and Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB). RESULTS: Fifty-eight HEU and 38 HUU infants were evaluated at 11-14 months of age. Performance on the BSID did not differ in any of the domains between HEU and HUU infants. The cognitive, language and motor scores were within the average range (US standardised norms). Seven (12%) HEU and 1 (2.6%) HUU infant showed social withdrawal on the ADBB (P = 0.10), while 15 (26%) HEU and 4 (11%) HUU infants showed decreased vocalisation (P = 0.06). There were no growth differences. Three HEU and one HUU infant had minor neurological signs, while eight HEU and two HUU infants had macrocephaly. CONCLUSIONS: Although findings on the early neurodevelopmental outcome of HEU infants are reassuring, minor differences in vocalisation and on neurological examination indicate a need for reassessment at a later age.
Keywords:
Afrique du Sud; HIV-exposed uninfected infants; South Africa; croissance infantile; infant growth; low- and middle-income countries; neurodevelopmental outcome; nourrissons exposés au VIH non infectés; pays à revenu faible et moyen; résultats neuro-développementaux
Authors: Stanzi M le Roux; Kirsten A Donald; Kirsty Brittain; Tamsin K Phillips; Allison Zerbe; Kelly K Nguyen; Andrea Strandvik; Max Kroon; Elaine J Abrams; Landon Myer Journal: AIDS Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Rachel S Gruver; Sumaya Mall; Jane D Kvalsvig; Justin R Knox; Claude A Mellins; Chris Desmond; Shuaib Kauchali; Stephen M Arpadi; Myra Taylor; Leslie L Davidson Journal: New Dir Child Adolesc Dev Date: 2020-07-03
Authors: Thomas Struyf; Queen Dube; Elizabeth A Cromwell; Anna D Sheahan; Robert S Heyderman; Annelies Van Rie Journal: Eur J Paediatr Neurol Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 3.140
Authors: Matthew A Budd; Kristina Calli; Lindy Samson; Jennifer Bowes; Anthony Y Y Hsieh; John C Forbes; Ari Bitnun; Joel Singer; Fatima Kakkar; Ariane Alimenti; Evelyn J Maan; M E Suzanne Lewis; Carole Gentile; Hélène C F Côté; Jason C Brophy Journal: Viruses Date: 2018-02-11 Impact factor: 5.048
Authors: Megan S McHenry; Kayode A Balogun; Brenna C McDonald; Rachel C Vreeman; Elizabeth C Whipple; Lena Serghides Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 6.707
Authors: Suzanne T Anderson; Felicia C Chow; Angharad G Davis; Sam Nightingale; Priscilla E Springer; Regan Solomons; Ana Arenivas; Robert J Wilkinson Journal: Wellcome Open Res Date: 2019-11-13