Literature DB >> 29130370

Normal adult and adolescent performance on TASIT-S, a short version of The Assessment of Social Inference Test.

Skye McDonald1, Cynthia Honan2, Samantha K Allen1, Rebecca El-Helou1, Michelle Kelly3, Fiona Kumfor4,5, Olivier Piguet4,5, Jessica L Hazelton4, Christine Padgett2, Hannah A D Keage6.   

Abstract

There is a need for short, reliable, sensitive assessment tools to measure social cognition. The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT) is an ecologically valid instrument that uses videos of actors engaged in everyday conversations to assess emotion perception, the ability to detect lies, sarcasm and sincerity, and the ability to judge what others are thinking, intending, feeling, and saying. A recently developed short version of TASIT retains the structure of the original test and its clinical sensitivity. In this paper, we compare TASIT-S performance in healthy adolescents, adults, and older adults as well as the effects of country (U.S.A. and Australia), English familiarity and gender. In this study 616 Australians including 226 adolescents (13-19) and 390 adults aged 20-75 + along with 180 U.S. residents (aged 20-74) completed one, two, or three parts of TASIT-S either face to face (Australians) or on-line (US residents). Results indicated that there were minor differences in TASIT-S performance (Part 3 only) based on country of residence and no significant effects for English familiarity in adolescents (not examined in adults). There were no gender effects. Young and middle aged adults (20-59) tended to perform better than adolescents and older adults on most parts of TASIT-S. In general, TASIT-S scores decreased moderately with advancing age. In conclusion, TASIT-S is a useful screen for social cognitive impairment in English speakers that is appropriate for use from adolescence through to older age. It produces comparable scores in the U.S.A. and Australia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Social cognition; assessment; clinical disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29130370     DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1400106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1385-4046            Impact factor:   3.535


  2 in total

1.  Physician Gender Differences in Processing Surgical Risk Features in Videos of Standardized Patients.

Authors:  Mark K Ferguson; Kristen Wroblewski; Megan Huisingh-Scheetz; Katherine Thompson; Jeanne Farnan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Simon Ducharme; Annemiek Dols; Robert Laforce; Emma Devenney; Fiona Kumfor; Jan van den Stock; Caroline Dallaire-Théroux; Harro Seelaar; Flora Gossink; Everard Vijverberg; Edward Huey; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Mario Masellis; Calvin Trieu; Chiadi Onyike; Paulo Caramelli; Leonardo Cruz de Souza; Alexander Santillo; Maria Landqvist Waldö; Ramon Landin-Romero; Olivier Piguet; Wendy Kelso; Dhamidhu Eratne; Dennis Velakoulis; Manabu Ikeda; David Perry; Peter Pressman; Bradley Boeve; Rik Vandenberghe; Mario Mendez; Carole Azuar; Richard Levy; Isabelle Le Ber; Sandra Baez; Alan Lerner; Ratnavalli Ellajosyula; Florence Pasquier; Daniela Galimberti; Elio Scarpini; John van Swieten; Michael Hornberger; Howard Rosen; John Hodges; Janine Diehl-Schmid; Yolande Pijnenburg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 13.501

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.