Literature DB >> 29128764

Synthetic and non-synthetic anthropogenic fibers in a river under the impact of Paris Megacity: Sampling methodological aspects and flux estimations.

Rachid Dris1, Johnny Gasperi2, Vincent Rocher3, Bruno Tassin1.   

Abstract

Processed fibers are highly present in our daily life and can be either natural, artificial (regenerated cellulose) and synthetic (made with petrochemicals). Their widespread use lead inevitably to a high contamination of environment. Previous studies focus on plastic particles regardless of their type or shape as long as they are comprised between 330μm and 5mm. On the contrary, this study focuses exclusively on fibers using a smaller mesh size net (80μm) to sample freshwater. Moreover, all processed organic fibers are considered, irrespective to their nature. First, the short term temporal variability of the fibers in the environment was assessed. While exposing the sampling net during 1min a coefficient of variation of approx. 45% (with n=6) was determined. It was of only 26% (n=6) when the exposure was of 3min. The assessment of the distribution through the section showed a possible difference in concentrations between the middle of the water surface and the river banks which could be attributed to the intense river traffic within the Paris Megacity. The vertical variability seems negligible as turbulence and current conditions homogenize the distribution of the fibers. A monthly monitoring showed concentrations of 100.6±99.9fibers·m-3 in the Marne River and of: 48.5±98.5, 27.9±26.3, 27.9±40.3 and 22.1±25.3fibers·m-3 from the upstream to downstream points in the Seine River. Once these concentrations are converted into fluxes, it seems that the impact generated by the Paris Megacity cannot be distinguished. Investigations on the role of sedimentation and deposition on the banks are required. This study helped fill some major knowledge gaps regarding the fibers in rivers, their sampling, occurrence, spatial-temporal distribution and fluxes. It is encouraged that future studies include both synthetic and none synthetic fibers.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fibers; Freshwater; Microplastic sampling; Microplastics; Synthetic fibers

Year:  2017        PMID: 29128764     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  18 in total

1.  Variation in the presence and abundance of anthropogenic microfibers in the Cumberland River in Nashville, TN, USA.

Authors:  Lina Said; Matthew J Heard
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Identification and removal of micro- and nano-plastics: Efficient and cost-effective methods.

Authors:  Aayushi Kundu; Nagaraj P Shetti; Soumen Basu; Kakarla Raghava Reddy; Mallikarjuna N Nadagouda; Tejraj M Aminabhavi
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 16.744

Review 3.  Microplastic sampling techniques in freshwaters and sediments: a review.

Authors:  Nastaran Razeghi; Amir Hossein Hamidian; Chenxi Wu; Yu Zhang; Min Yang
Journal:  Environ Chem Lett       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 9.027

4.  The imprint of microfibres in southern European deep seas.

Authors:  Anna Sanchez-Vidal; Richard C Thompson; Miquel Canals; William P de Haan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: Critical review and assessment of data quality.

Authors:  Albert A Koelmans; Nur Hazimah Mohamed Nor; Enya Hermsen; Merel Kooi; Svenja M Mintenig; Jennifer De France
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 6.  Analysis and Prevention of Microplastics Pollution in Water: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Yolanda Picó; Damià Barceló
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-04-12

7.  Seasonality of riverine macroplastic transport.

Authors:  Tim van Emmerik; Emilie Strady; Thuy-Chung Kieu-Le; Luan Nguyen; Nicolas Gratiot
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Plastic microfibre pollution: how important is clothes' laundering?

Authors:  Christine Gaylarde; Jose Antonio Baptista-Neto; Estefan Monteiro da Fonseca
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-05-25

9.  Distribution and Seasonal Variation of Microplastics in Tallo River, Makassar, Eastern Indonesia.

Authors:  Ega Adhi Wicaksono; Shinta Werorilangi; Tamara S Galloway; Akbar Tahir
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-06-01

10.  Chronic microfiber exposure in adult Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes).

Authors:  Lingling Hu; Melissa Chernick; Anna M Lewis; P Lee Ferguson; David E Hinton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.