Literature DB >> 29128382

Bad news: The influence of news coverage and Google searches on Gardasil adverse event reporting.

Kate Faasse1, Jarry T Porsius2, Jonathan Faasse, Leslie R Martin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human papilloma virus vaccines are a safe and effective tool for reducing HPV infections that can cause cervical cancer. However, uptake of these vaccines has been suboptimal, with many people holding negative beliefs and misconceptions. Such beliefs have been linked with the experience of unpleasant side effects following medical treatment, and media coverage may heighten such concerns.
METHODS: The present study sought to assess the influence of news coverage (number of news articles per month) on adverse event reporting in response to Gardasil vaccination in New Zealand over a 7.5-year period, and whether the influence of news coverage was mediated by internet search activity (Google search volumes). Multiple linear regression analyses and simple mediation analyses were used, controlling for year and number of vaccinations delivered.
RESULTS: News coverage in the previous month, and Google search volumes in the same month, were significant predictors of adverse event reporting, after accounting for vaccination rates and year. Concurrent Google search volumes partially mediated the effect of prior news coverage.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that some of the adverse events reported were not related to the vaccination itself, but to news coverage and internet search volumes, which may have contributed to public concerns about potentially unpleasant or harmful outcomes. These findings have implications for the importance of psychological and social factors in adverse event reporting, and the role of the news media in disseminating health information.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Expectations; Gardasil; Human papilloma virus; News media; Nocebo effect

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29128382     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  10 in total

Review 1.  Addressing HPV vaccine myths: practical information for healthcare providers.

Authors:  Robert A Bednarczyk
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Promoting immunization resiliency in the digital information age.

Authors:  Noni E MacDonald; Eve Dubé
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2020-01-02

3.  Relative contributions of parental intention and provider recommendation style to HPV and meningococcal vaccine receipt.

Authors:  Terresa J Eun; Amresh Hanchate; Anny T Fenton; Jack A Clark; Marisa N Aurora; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Rebecca B Perkins
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  The Effects of Health Anxiety and Litigation Potential on Symptom Endorsement, Cognitive Performance, and Physiological Functioning in the Context of a Food and Drug Administration Drug Recall Announcement.

Authors:  Len Lecci; Gary Ryan Page; Julian R Keith; Sarah Neal; Ashley Ritter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-13

5.  The Effect of Science-Related Populism on Vaccination Attitudes and Decisions.

Authors:  Sarah Kohler; Isabell Koinig
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2022-06-10

6.  Decline in HPV-vaccination uptake in Denmark - the association between HPV-related media coverage and HPV-vaccination.

Authors:  Camilla Hiul Suppli; Niels Dalum Hansen; Mette Rasmussen; Palle Valentiner-Branth; Tyra Grove Krause; Kåre Mølbak
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Changing mindsets about side effects.

Authors:  Kari A Leibowitz; Lauren C Howe; Alia J Crum
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Placebo: a brief updated review.

Authors:  Alfredo Jose Pardo-Cabello; Victoria Manzano-Gamero; Emilio Puche-Cañas
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.195

Review 9.  A systematic review of factors associated with side-effect expectations from medical interventions.

Authors:  Louise E Smith; Rebecca K Webster; G James Rubin
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Characterizing News Report of the Substandard Vaccine Case of Changchun Changsheng in China: A Text Mining Approach.

Authors:  Ping Zhou; Yao He; Chao Lyu; Xiaoguang Yang
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.