| Literature DB >> 29126767 |
Yavuz Saglam1, Baris Gulenc2, Fevzi Birisik3, Ali Ersen4, Ebru Yilmaz Yalcinkaya5, Onder Yazicioglu6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the patient demographics, etiology of limb loss as well as reporting SF-36 scores for microprocessor prosthesis users in Turkish population.Entities:
Keywords: Microprocessor controlled prosthesis; Physical component summary score; Quality of life analysis; Trans-femoral amputees
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29126767 PMCID: PMC6197582 DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.10.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc ISSN: 1017-995X Impact factor: 1.511
SF-36 sub-dimensions and explanations.
| SF-36 sub-dimensions | Low score | High score |
|---|---|---|
| Physical function | Limitation in all physical activity like dressing or taking a bath | Able to do all physical activities without limitation |
| Limitation of physical function | Role limitations in work and daily activities due to physical health problems | No physical limitation in work and daily activities |
| Pain | Severe and limiting pain | Painless or no limitation due to pain |
| General health perception | Believing in having a bad or worse health | Believing in having an excellent health |
| Mental health | Emotion of being nervous or in depression constantly | Emotion of being calm, relax and happy |
| Limitation of emotion | Role limitations in work and daily activities due to emotional problems | No limitation in work and daily activities due to emotional problems |
| Vitality | Feeling tired and exhausted | Feeling lively and energetic |
| Social function | Limitations in social activities due to physical and emotional problems | No limitation in social activities due to physical and emotional problems |
Mean (SD) scores for eight variables of SF-36 for women and men for Turkish population..
| Variables (N) | Women (n = 670) | Men (n = 609) |
|---|---|---|
| PF (1279) | 80.6 ± 21.7 | 87.2 ± 17.1 |
| RP (1279) | 82.9 ± 28.6 | 89.8 ± 19.3 |
| BP (1279) | 81.0 ± 20.2 | 85.1 ± 16.4 |
| GH (1279) | 69.1 ± 16.9 | 73.6 ± 14.9 |
| VT (1271) | 63.4 ± 13.7 | 65.7 ± 11.9 |
| SF (1279) | 90.1 ± 12.9 | 91.7 ± 12.8 |
| RE (1279) | 89.0 ± 22.5 | 92.8 ± 15.1 |
| MH (1271) | 70.1 ± 11.4 | 71.0 ± 10.6 |
| PCS (1271) | 46.6 ± 9.9 | 49.4 ± 7.4 |
| MCS (1271) | 47.3 ± 9.8 | 48.2 ± 9.1 |
Differences between microprocessor using amputee's and Turkish normal controls for all sub-dimensions of SF-36. Only SF (social functioning) showed significant difference (78.1 ± 19.6 vs. 91.6 ± 12.8, p < 0.001).
Comparison of PCS and MCS scores between genders in microprocessor user amputee's.
| Women | Men | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCS | 43.3 | 48.7 | 0.03 |
| MCS | 46 | 48.2 | 0.13 |
Comparison of SF-36 scores regarding to the amputation age.
| Amputation < 18 years old | Amputation > 18 years old | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SF-36 | 89.3 ± 7.3 | 86.6 ± 7.1 | 0.25 |
Comparison of SF-36 scores regarding to the etiology of amputa.
| Traumatic etiology of amputation | Non- traumatic etiology of amputation | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SF-36 | 90.4 ± 8.8 | 87.5 ± 6.2 | 0.33 |