Literature DB >> 29125942

Conditions for addressing environmental determinants of health behavior in intersectoral policy networks: A fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis.

D T J M Peters1, S Verweij2, K Grêaux3, K Stronks1, J Harting4.   

Abstract

Improving health requires changes in the social, physical, economic and political determinants of health behavior. For the realization of policies that address these environmental determinants, intersectoral policy networks are considered necessary for the pooling of resources to implement different policy instruments. However, such network diversity may increase network complexity and therefore hamper network performance. Network complexity may be reduced by network management and the provision of financial resources. This study examined whether network diversity - amidst the other conditions - is indeed needed to address environmental determinants of health behavior. We included 25 intersectoral policy networks in Dutch municipalities aimed at reducing overweight, smoking, and alcohol/drugs abuse. For our fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis we used data from three web-based surveys among (a) project leaders regarding network diversity and size (n = 38); (b) project leaders and project partners regarding management (n = 278); and (c) implementation professionals regarding types of environmental determinants addressed (n = 137). Data on budgets were retrieved from project application forms. Contrary to their intentions, most policy networks typically addressed personal determinants. If the environment was addressed too, it was mostly the social environment. To address environmental determinants of health behavior, network diversity (>50% of the actors are non-public health) was necessary in networks that were either small (<16 actors) or had small budgets (<€183,172), when both were intensively managed. Irrespective of network diversity, environmental determinants also were addressed by small networks with large budgets, and by large networks with small budgets, when both provided network management. We conclude that network diversity is important - although not necessary - for resource pooling to address environmental determinants of health behavior, but only effective in the presence of network management. Our findings may support intersectoral policy networks in improving health behaviors by addressing a variety of environmental determinants.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental determinants; Financial resources; Fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis; Health behavior; Intersectoral policy networks; Network diversity; Network management; Network size

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29125942     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  2 in total

1.  Do inhabitants profit from integrating a public health focus in urban renewal programmes? A Dutch case study.

Authors:  Annemarie Ruijsbroek; Albert Wong; Frank den Hertog; Mariël Droomers; Carolien van den Brink; Anton E Kunst; Hans A M van Oers; Karien Stronks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review.

Authors:  Shinjini Mondal; Sara Van Belle; Antonia Maioni
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.344

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.