Literature DB >> 29124889

The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting - a prospective observational comparative study.

George Mirmilstein1, Bhavan Prasad Rai1, Olayinka Gbolahan1, Vinaya Srirangam1, Ashish Narula1, Samita Agarwal1, Tim M Lane1, Nikhil Vasdev1, James Adshead1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) technique in a British setting in men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) . PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed our prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent RALP between November 2008 and February 2017. We examined preoperative pathological and functional parameters, intraoperative nerve sparing (NS), postoperative histology, as well as functional and oncological follow-up. We compared those who had a NeuroSAFE approach and those who had NS without NeuroSAFE. We also compared all the RALPs before and after the introduction of NeuroSAFE. Statistical analysis was done using the two-tailed t-test and chi-squared analysis.
RESULTS: This single surgeon series included 417 RALPs, including 120 NeuroSAFEs. The NeuroSAFE cohort had a greater proportion of D'Amico high-risk disease (30.8% vs 9.6%, P < 0.001), higher Gleason scores and higher pT stage compared to the non-NeuroSAFE NS cohort. After the introduction of NeuroSAFE, more preoperatively potent men underwent bilateral NS with pT2 disease (84.6% vs 66.3%, P = 0.002) and more overall NS were performed in patients with pT3 disease (65.1% vs 36.7%, P = 0.012). Overall positive surgical margin (PSM) rates were lower in the NeuroSAFE cohort compared to those who had NS without NeuroSAFE (9.2% vs 17.8%, P = 0.04). The 12-month potency rates were also higher in the NeuroSAFE cohort for both bilateral (77.3% vs 50.9%, P = 0.009) and unilateral (70.6% vs 40%, P = 0.04) NS. Pad-free continence was also higher in the NeuroSAFE group (85.7% vs 70.9%, P = 0.019), but there was no significant difference between those who were wearing ≤1 safety pad. Although we only had short-term oncological follow-up, it did not significantly differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Adoption of NeuroSAFE allowed us to offer NS in higher risk patients, whilst reducing PSM rates and at the same time improving potency at 12 months.
© 2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NeuroSAFE; frozen section; nerve sparing; potency; prostate cancer; prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29124889     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  9 in total

1.  Re: What is the role of NeuroSAFE in robotic radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Eoin Dinneen; A Haider; J Grierson; T Briggs; R Persad; N Oakley; A Freeman; G Shaw
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-04-12

2.  What is the role of Neurosafe in robotic radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  S S Goonewardene; D Cahill
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-10

Review 3.  Impact of human placental derivative allografts on functional and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a literature review.

Authors:  Jonathan Noël; Subuhee Ahmed; Anya Mascarenhas; Daniel Stirt; Marcio Moschovas; Ela Patel; Sunil Reddy; Seetharam Bhat; Travis Rogers; Vipul Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-06-18

Review 4.  Techniques of robotic radical prostatectomy for the management of prostate cancer: which one, when and why.

Authors:  Shuo Liu; Ashok Hemal
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

5.  NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Eoin Dinneen; Aiman Haider; Clare Allen; Alex Freeman; Tim Briggs; Senthil Nathan; Chris Brew-Graves; Jack Grierson; Norman R Williams; Raj Persad; Neil Oakley; Jim M Adshead; Hartwig Huland; Alexander Haese; Greg Shaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Intraoperative assessment and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens to guide nerve-sparing surgery in prostate cancer patients (NeuroSAFE).

Authors:  Margaretha A van der Slot; Michael A den Bakker; Sjoerd Klaver; Mike Kliffen; Martijn B Busstra; John B W Rietbergen; Melanie Gan; Karen E Hamoen; Leo M Budel; Natascha N T Goemaere; Chris H Bangma; Jozien Helleman; Monique J Roobol; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Concordance between Preoperative mpMRI and Pathological Stage and Its Influence on Nerve-Sparing Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Clara Humke; Benedikt Hoeh; Felix Preisser; Mike Wenzel; Maria N Welte; Lena Theissen; Boris Bodelle; Jens Koellermann; Thomas Steuber; Alexander Haese; Frederik Roos; Luis Alex Kluth; Andreas Becker; Felix K H Chun; Philipp Mandel
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eoin Dinneen; Jack Grierson; Ricardo Almeida-Magana; Rosie Clow; Aiman Haider; Clare Allen; Daniel Heffernan-Ho; Alex Freeman; Tim Briggs; Senthil Nathan; Susan Mallett; Chris Brew-Graves; Nicola Muirhead; Norman R Williams; Elena Pizzo; Raj Persad; Jon Aning; Lyndsey Johnson; Jon Oxley; Neil Oakley; Susan Morgan; Fawzia Tahir; Imran Ahmad; Lorenzo Dutto; Jonathan M Salmond; Anand Kelkar; John Kelly; Greg Shaw
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.728

9.  Practice Patterns of Korean Urologists Regarding Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy: a Survey and Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Ryu; Yun Beom Kim; Tae Young Jung; Woo Jin Ko; Sun Il Kim; Dongdeuk Kwon; Duk Yoon Kim; Tae Hee Oh; Tag Keun Yoo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.153

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.