Literature DB >> 29124779

Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure and cancer risk in women.

Rebecca Troisi1, Elizabeth E Hatch2, Linda Titus3, William Strohsnitter4, Mitchell H Gail1, Dezheng Huo5, Ervin Adam6, Stanley J Robboy7, Marianne Hyer8, Robert N Hoover1, Julie R Palmer9.   

Abstract

In the Diethylstilbestrol [DES] Combined Cohort Follow-up, the age- and calendar-year specific standardized incidence ratio [SIR] for clear cell adenocarcinoma [CCA] was 27.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.51-70.6) for the exposed women. The SIR for breast cancer was 1.17 (95% CI 1.01-1.36) and the hazard ratio [HR] adjusted for birth year and cohort for comparison with the unexposed was 1.05 (95% CI 0.79-1.41). The SIR for pancreatic cancer was 2.43 (95% CI 1.21-4.34) and the adjusted HR for comparison with unexposed women was 7.16 (95% CI 0.84-61.5). There was little evidence of excess risk for other sites. There appeared to be a deficit in risk for endometrial cancer among the exposed (SIR 0.61; 95% CI 0.35-0.98), and an excess in the unexposed (SIR 1.55; 95% CI 0.95-2.40); the adjusted HR was 0.45 (95% CI 0.22-0.93) for the internal comparison. There was no overall excess cancer risk in exposed women compared with general population rates (1.06; 95% CI 0.95-1.17) or with unexposed participants (adjusted HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.84-1.25). These data do not support the suggestion that there is a diathesis of cancers in DES exposed female offspring The excess risk of breast and pancreatic cancers that we observed is concerning and warrants continued follow-up and mechanistic investigation. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 60:395-403, 2019. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DES; cancer; diethylstilbestrol; endocrine disruptors; estrogen

Year:  2017        PMID: 29124779     DOI: 10.1002/em.22155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  11 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the Public Health Implications of the Food Preservative Propylparaben: Has This Chemical Been Safely Used for Decades.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Jennifer Bugos
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2021-01-08

2.  Introduction: Special Issue on Transplacental/Transgenerational Mutagenesis and Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Suryanarayana V Vulimiri; Ofelia Olivero
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Risk of clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix among US women with potential exposure to diethylstilbestrol in utero.

Authors:  Mary C White; Hannah K Weir; Ashwini V Soman; Lucy A Peipins; Trevor D Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.532

4.  In utero exposure to 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate and risk of cancer in offspring.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Piera M Cirillo; Nickilou Y Krigbaum; Barbara A Cohn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 10.693

Review 5.  Cancer Progress and Priorities: Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Serena C Houghton; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.090

Review 6.  Effects of environmental stressors on stem cells.

Authors:  Jessica R Worley; Graham C Parker
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  In utero Exposure to Genotoxicants Leading to Genetic Mosaicism: An Overlooked Window of Susceptibility in Genetic Toxicology Testing?

Authors:  Roger W L Godschalk; Carole L Yauk; Jan van Benthem; George R Douglas; Francesco Marchetti
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 8.  Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louisane Eve; Béatrice Fervers; Muriel Le Romancer; Nelly Etienne-Selloum
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Are the Effects of DES Over? A Tragic Lesson from the Past.

Authors:  Pilar Zamora-León
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure and risk of diabetes, gallbladder disease, and pancreatic disorders and malignancies.

Authors:  Rebecca Troisi; Marianne Hyer; Linda Titus; Julie R Palmer; Elizabeth E Hatch; Dezheng Huo; Kjersti M Aagaard; William C Strohsnitter; Robert N Hoover
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.