Literature DB >> 29124670

Visual working memory can selectively reset a subset of its representations.

Halely Balaban1,2, Trafton Drew3, Roy Luria4,5.   

Abstract

The visual working memory (VWM) resetting process is triggered when the mapping between an object in the environment and its corresponding VWM representation becomes irrelevant. Resetting involves discarding the no longer relevant representations, and encoding novel representations and mappings. We examined how resetting operates on VWM's contents. Specifically, we tested whether losing only part of the encoded mappings led to resetting all of the VWM representations. Subjects monitored moving polygons for an abrupt shape-change. Occasionally, a polygon separated into two halves that continued to move independently, making the original single mapping irrelevant. This loss of mapping triggered a resetting process, producing a performance cost: subjects missed shape-changes when they occurred during resetting, but not when the changes occurred before or after resetting. Critically, the cost was (1) specific to the separated item, (2) larger when more mappings were lost, and (3) unaffected by the set-size. This suggests that resetting is a "local" process: VWM removes only the representations whose mappings are lost.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Correspondence; Resetting; Visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29124670     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1400-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Revisiting confidence intervals for repeated measures designs.

Authors:  Justin G Hollands; Jerzy Jarmasz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

3.  Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural limits to representing objects still within view.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsubomi; Keisuke Fukuda; Katsumi Watanabe; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Object representations in visual working memory change according to the task context.

Authors:  Halely Balaban; Roy Luria
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Neural measures of dynamic changes in attentive tracking load.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The number of objects determines visual working memory capacity allocation for complex items.

Authors:  Halely Balaban; Roy Luria
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Neural and Behavioral Evidence for an Online Resetting Process in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Halely Balaban; Roy Luria
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Direct electrophysiological measurement of attentional templates in visual working memory.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Jason T Arita
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-12-30

Review 10.  The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Halely Balaban; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.