Alexandre Gosselin-Tardif1, Jessica Lie2, Ioana Nicolau3, Juan Carlos Molina3, Jonathan Cools-Lartigue3, Liane Feldman4, Jonathan Spicer3, Carmen Mueller3, Lorenzo Ferri3. 1. Department of General Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. alexandre.gosselin-tardif@mail.mcgill.ca. 2. Department of General Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. 3. Division of Thoracic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. 4. Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite evidence of oncologic benefits from extended (D2) lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer from many East Asian studies, there is persistent debate over its use in the West, mainly due to perceived high rates of morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of D2 dissection in a high-volume North American center. METHODS: A prospectively entered database of all patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer at a North American referral center from 2005 to 2016 was reviewed. Wedge resections, thoracoabdominal approach, emergency surgery, palliative operations, and non-adenocarcinoma cases were excluded. RESULTS: Of 366 non-bariatric gastrectomies over this period, 175 met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 73 years and 69% were male. One hundred forty-one patients (80%) underwent D2 dissection, the rest having D1. There was no difference in postoperative complications (D1 = 44%: D2 = 42%), anastomotic leaks (D1 = 6%: D2 = 5%), and same-admission or 30-day mortality (D1 = 6%: D2 = 2%). D2 dissection was associated with higher pathological stage (72% > stage 1 vs 38% > stage 1; p < 0.05) and median lymph node yield (30 vs 14; p < 0.05), with no difference in complete resection (R0) rate (D1 = 98% vs D2 = 92%). Laparoscopic approach was employed in 34% (45/141) of D2 cases, resulting in shorter median length of stay (6 days vs 9; p < 0.05) and equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to open D2. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of D2 lymphadenectomy, by either open or laparoscopic approach, in high-volume North American centers as a safe and effective oncologic procedure for gastric cancer, with equivalent complication rates and superior lymph node yield to traditional D1 dissection.
PURPOSE: Despite evidence of oncologic benefits from extended (D2) lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer from many East Asian studies, there is persistent debate over its use in the West, mainly due to perceived high rates of morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of D2 dissection in a high-volume North American center. METHODS: A prospectively entered database of all patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer at a North American referral center from 2005 to 2016 was reviewed. Wedge resections, thoracoabdominal approach, emergency surgery, palliative operations, and non-adenocarcinoma cases were excluded. RESULTS: Of 366 non-bariatric gastrectomies over this period, 175 met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 73 years and 69% were male. One hundred forty-one patients (80%) underwent D2 dissection, the rest having D1. There was no difference in postoperative complications (D1 = 44%: D2 = 42%), anastomotic leaks (D1 = 6%: D2 = 5%), and same-admission or 30-day mortality (D1 = 6%: D2 = 2%). D2 dissection was associated with higher pathological stage (72% > stage 1 vs 38% > stage 1; p < 0.05) and median lymph node yield (30 vs 14; p < 0.05), with no difference in complete resection (R0) rate (D1 = 98% vs D2 = 92%). Laparoscopic approach was employed in 34% (45/141) of D2 cases, resulting in shorter median length of stay (6 days vs 9; p < 0.05) and equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to open D2. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of D2 lymphadenectomy, by either open or laparoscopic approach, in high-volume North American centers as a safe and effective oncologic procedure for gastric cancer, with equivalent complication rates and superior lymph node yield to traditional D1 dissection.
Authors: J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-03-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yinin Hu; Timothy L McMurry; Bernadette Goudreau; Katie M Leick; Tri M Le; Victor M Zaydfudim Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Yinin Hu; Elvira L Vos; Raymond E Baser; Mark A Schattner; Makoto Nishimura; Daniel G Coit; Vivian E Strong Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 5.344