| Literature DB >> 26903580 |
Yanfeng Hu1, Changming Huang1, Yihong Sun1, Xiangqian Su1, Hui Cao1, Jiankun Hu1, Yingwei Xue1, Jian Suo1, Kaixiong Tao1, Xianli He1, Hongbo Wei1, Mingang Ying1, Weiguo Hu1, Xiaohui Du1, Pingyan Chen1, Hao Liu1, Chaohui Zheng1, Fenglin Liu1, Jiang Yu1, Ziyu Li1, Gang Zhao1, Xinzu Chen1, Kuan Wang1, Ping Li1, Jiadi Xing1, Guoxin Li2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of radical laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LG) with D2 lymphadenectomy for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remain controversial. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare laparoscopic and conventional open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissections for AGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2012 and December 2014, 1,056 patients with clinical stage T2-4aN0-3M0 gastric cancer were eligible for inclusion. They were randomly assigned to either the LG with D2 lymphadenectomy group (n = 528) or the open gastrectomy (OG) with D2 lymphadenectomy group (n = 528). Fifteen experienced surgeons from 14 institutions in China participated in the study. The morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery between the LG (n = 519) and the OG (n = 520) groups were compared on the basis of the modified intention-to-treat principle. Postoperative complications were stratified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26903580 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Oncol ISSN: 0732-183X Impact factor: 44.544