| Literature DB >> 29124240 |
Jack Crozier1, Nathan Papa1, Marlon Perera1, Michael Stewart2, Jeremy Goad2, Shomik Sengupta1,3, Damien Bolton1,3, Nathan Lawrentschuk1,3,4.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the oncological implications of increased nodal dissection in node-negative bladder cancer during radical cystectomy in a contemporary Australian series. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Lymph node excision; Neoplasm staging; Survival; Urinary bladder neoplasms
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29124240 PMCID: PMC5671960 DOI: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.416
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Investig Clin Urol ISSN: 2466-0493
Fig. 1Definitions of pelvic lymph node dissection templates. Limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) (A), standard PLND (B), extended PLND (C), and superextended PLND (D).
Demographic, surgical, and pathological characteristics of the study cohort (n=220)
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
| Age at surgery (y) | 69.5 (60.3–74.9) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 177 (80) |
| Female | 43 (20) |
| Type of surgery | |
| Cystectomy | 36 (16) |
| Cystoprostatectomy | 157 (71) |
| Extended | 27 (12) |
| Number of nodes taken | |
| 1–5 | 58 (26) |
| 6–15 | 99 (45) |
| ≥16 | 63 (29) |
| Highest dissection level | |
| Limited PLND | 130 (59) |
| Standard PLND | 32 (15) |
| Extended PLND | 58 (26) |
| Margin | |
| Negative | 203 (92) |
| Positive | 17 (8) |
| Pathological T stage | |
| T0 | 26 (12) |
| T1 | 28 (13) |
| T2 | 59 (27) |
| T3 | 51 (23) |
| T4 | 14 (6) |
| Ta/Tis | 42 (19) |
Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).
PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection.
Fig. 2Populations of highest dissection level over time.
Fig. 3Populations of number of nodes taken over time.
Fig. 4Kaplan-Meier plots of bladder cancer specific survival grouped by number of nodes harvested with log-rank test.
Multivariable Cox regression mode
| Variable | HR (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Number of nodes taken | ||
| 1–5 | 1.00 | |
| 6–15 | 0.78 (0.43–1.39) | 0.39 |
| ≥16 | 0.31 (0.17–0.57) | <0.001 |
| Sex | ||
| Female | 1.00 | |
| Male | 0.63 (0.23–1.73) | 0.37 |
| Margin | ||
| Negative | 1.00 | |
| Positive | 1.54 (1.25–1.89) | <0.001 |
| T stage | ||
| T0/a/is/1 | 1.00 | |
| T2 | 2.21 (1.03–4.76) | 0.042 |
| T3/4 | 2.31 (1.63–3.28) | <0.001 |
| Age at surgery (per year increase) | 1.04 (0.97–1.10) | 0.26 |
| Year of surgery (per one year later) | 1.16 (1.01–1.34) | 0.040 |
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 5Predicted probability (red line) of bladder cancer death within 2 years of cystectomy and 95% confidence interval. Black dots are patients who died of bladder cancer and blue dots are patients alive at 2. One patient alive at 2 years with 68 nodes harvested not shown.
Fig. 6Predicted probability of bladder cancer death within 2 years of cystectomy versus number of nodes taken at each dissection level.