Literature DB >> 29124164

Structural insight into activation of homoserine dehydrogenase from the archaeon Sulfolobus tokodaii via reduction.

Yoshihisa Tomonaga1, Ryosuke Kaneko2, Masaru Goto2, Toshihisa Ohshima3, Kazuaki Yoshimune1.   

Abstract

Homoserine dehydrogenase (HSD; 305 amino acid residues) catalyzes an NAD(P)-dependent reversible reaction between l-homoserine and aspartate 4-semialdehyde and is involved in the aspartate pathway. HSD from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus tokodaii was markedly activated (2.5-fold) by the addition of 0.8 mM dithiothreitol. The crystal structure of the homodimer indicated that the activation was caused by cleavage of the disulfide bond formed between two cysteine residues (C303) in the C-terminal regions of the two subunits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activation; Bis-tris, 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2,2′,2″-nitrilotriethanol; Crystal structure; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; DTT, dithiothreitol; Disulfide bond; HEPES, [4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl] ethanesulfonic acid; HSD, homoserine dehydrogenase; Homoserine dehydrogenase; Hyperthermophilic archaea; IPTG, isopropyl 1-thio-β-d-galactoside; KPB, potassium phosphate buffer; LB medium, Luria-Bertani medium; ORF, open reading frame; PDB, Protein Data Bank; PEG, poly(ethylene glycol); RMSD, root mean square deviation; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; Tricine, N-[tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl]glycine; Tris, tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane; mPMS, 1-methoxy-5-methyl-phenazinium methyl sulfate

Year:  2015        PMID: 29124164      PMCID: PMC5668673          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2015.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep        ISSN: 2405-5808


Introduction

HSD (EC 1.1.1.3) catalyzes the reversible NAD(P)-dependent oxidation of l-homoserine to l-aspartate 4-semialdehyde and NAD(P)H. The reverse reaction is responsible for the production of l-homoserine in the aspartate pathway, which produces four l-amino acids (lysine, threonine, cysteine, and methionine) as final products from l-aspartate [1]. Because its product l-homoserine is a precursor of l-threonine, l-cysteine, and l-methionine and its substrate l-aspartate 4-semialdehyde is a precursor of l-lysine, HSD plays a key regulatory role in the pathway. HSD is found in plants, fungi, and bacteria, but not in animals, indicating that HSD is a good target for new pesticides and antibiotics [2]. l-lysine is synthesized via the l-α-aminoadipate pathway in hyperthermophilic archaea and fungi, though the diaminopimelate pathway is utilized for lysine production in bacteria and plants [3]. HSD is often susceptible to feedback inhibition by end products in the aspartate pathway. HSD from Corynebacterium glutamicum is inhibited by both threonine and methionine [4], and the enzyme from Thermus flavus AT-62 is inhibited by cysteine [5]. The Escherichia coli enzyme is known to exhibit bifunctional activity as both an HSD and an aspartate kinase (EC 2.7.2.4) [6]. The bifunctional HSD catalyzes the first and third steps in the aspartate pathway and is found in bacteria and plants [7]. Usually, the bifunctional enzyme has more than 800 amino acid residues and is much larger than monofunctional HSD, which consists of approximately 300 amino acid residues. Based on their amino acid sequences, HSDs are divided into three groups: a short-chain group and two long-chain groups with extensions at the C-terminus [8]. The latter groups, which possess approximately 70-residue extensions at the C-terminus, are feedback inhibited by threonine or methionine. The biochemical and structural characteristics and regulation mechanisms of HSDs from bacteria, yeasts, plants, and animals have been extensively studied so far, but information on these enzymes from the third domain of life, i.e., the archaea, is extremely scanty. Thus, we screened the HSD gene homologs of archaeal strains in a genome data bank and found a hypothetical HSD gene from the acidophilic and hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus tokodaii (StHSD; 304 amino acids). In this study, we succeeded in overexpression of the gene product in E. coli and found that the purified enzyme is uniquely activated by a reducing agent DTT. In addition, based on structural analyses, we found a novel type of activation mechanism in which the cleavage of an intermolecular disulfide bond between the C-terminal regions of the two subunits is responsible for the enzyme activity.

Materials and methods

All reagents were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, unless otherwise noted. The expression plasmid for StHSD was constructed as follows. The hypothetical HSD gene from S. tokodaii NBRC100140T was amplified using genomic DNA purchased from the National Institute of Technology and Evaluation. The primer set of 5′- CACCATGAAATTATTACTCTTTGGTTATGGAAATG-3′ and 5′- TCATAAGCAATCTCTCTTTAGAAGAATTAAATC-3′ was used for amplification of the ORF. The PCR product obtained was ligated into pET101 according to the manufacturer’s instructions for Champion™ pET Directional TOPO® expression kits (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The ORF in the resultant plasmid, pSTHSD, was confirmed to have the correct sequence. The E. coli BL21(DE3) strain was transformed with the pSTHSD plasmid, cultured at 310 K for 12 h in LB medium supplemented with ampicillin (50 μg/L), and then sonicated in 10 mM KPB (pH 7.0). StHSD was purified by single-column chromatography with DEAE-TOYOPEARL after heat treatment (343 K for 3 h) of the cell extract. The column was washed with 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), and StHSD was eluted with 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) containing 50 mM NaCl. The purified enzyme was dialyzed against 10 mM KPB (pH 7.0) and concentrated with an Amicon Ultra 10 K filter unit (Millipore). The homogeneity of the final StHSD preparation was confirmed by SDS-PAGE. The activation of StHSD by various concentrations of DTT was assayed using WST-1 (Dojindo Laboratories), which is reduced by NADH to form WST-1 formazan in the presence of the electron acceptor mPMS, in a reaction mixture consisting of 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) and 1 mM DTT. The increase of the WST-1 formazan level was monitored at 438 nm. The StHSD activity was calculated using a molar coefficient of 37,000 at 438 nm for WST-1 formazan. The kinetic parameter was determined by measuring the increase in absorbance of the produced NADH at 340 nm (molar coefficient of 6,200) at 303 K in 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0). The oxidized form was prepared by the pre-treatment of StHSD with 0.1 mM potassium ferricyanide for 2 h. The reduced form was prepared by the pre-treatment with 1 mM DTT for 2 h. The protein concentration of the crude cell extract was measured by use of a Pierce® BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific Pierce). Crystals of StHSD were grown at 285 K by the hanging-drop vapor diffusion method with 100 μL of reservoir solution [9.5% (w/v) PEG 3350, 19% (w/v) PEG 400, 0.19 M magnesium chloride, and 2.5% DMSO]. The droplets (pH 4.1) was prepared by mixing 1.5 μL of purified enzyme (5.9 mg/mL) and an equal amount of reservoir solution. The crystals of the reduced form were prepared by soaking crystals in the solution consisting of 3 μl of the reservoir solution and 1 μl of 200 mM DTT for 60 min prior to the first diffraction data collection. The crystals were flash-frozen using liquid nitrogen. Diffraction data were collected at beamlines at the Photon Factory, Tsukuba, Japan. The data sets were collected for the oxidized and reduced forms, respectively, at 95 K. All images were indexed and integrated using the program HKL2000 [9], and the data sets were phased with molecular replacement by using the program Phaser [10]. An initial phasing model was prepared by homology modeling using SWISS-MODEL [11]. The models were built using the program COOT [12] and refined using Refmac5 [13]. The two subunits in the asymmetric units were refined without no crystallographic symmetry restraints. Both the main and the side chains were clearly identified in the 2Fo–Fc electron density map, and the final difference Fourier maps did not contain any significant peaks. The programs RAMPAGE [14] and SFCHECK [15] in the CCP4 package were used for stereochemistry analysis of all models and for calculation of the RMSD as well as the average error by the Luzzati plot. The statistics for data collection and refinement are presented in Table 1. All figures illustrating these structures were prepared using the program CCP4mg [16]. The coordinates of the oxidized and reduced forms have been deposited in the PDB under entry number 4YDR and 5AVO, respectively.
Table 1

Data collection and refinement statistics.a

Oxidized formReduced form
Data collection statistics
BeamlineNE3A (PF-AR)NE3A (PF-AR)
Wavelength (Å)1.00001.0000
Resolution (Å)50.0–1.60 (1.63–1.60)50.0–1.80 (1.83–1.80)
No. of reflections (measured/unique)345,770/74,576119,944/47,593
Rmergeb (%)7.8 (29.5)6.2 (26.1)
Completeness (%)99.2 (100)90.6 (94.8)
Multiplicity (%)4.6 (4.9)2.5 (2.4)
No. of crystals11
Space groupP21P21
Unit –cell constants
 a (Å)57.40157.818
 b (Å)79.47278.909
 c (Å)65.89965.814
 α (deg)9090
 β (deg)107.16105.79
 γ (deg)9090







Refinement statistics
Resolution range (Å)28.5–1.6050.0–1.80
No. of reflections70,67045,154
Rfactor for 95% datac0.1970.211
Free Rfactor for 5% data0.2280.247
No. of atoms
 Protein4,5764,500
 Water402195
 Sodium ion10
RMSD from ideality
 Bond lengths (Å)0.00780.0075
 Bond angles (°)1.29331.2445
Ramachandran analysis
 Favored (%)96.597.3
 Allowed (%)3.52.7
 Disallowed (%)00

Values in parentheses are statistics for the highest-resolution shell, whose range is 1.63–1.60  Å.

Rmerge=ΣhklΣi|I,−〈I〉|/ΣhklΣiI where I=observed intensity and 〈I〉=average intensity for multiple measurements.

Rfree was monitored with 5% of the reflection data excluded from the refinement.

Data collection and refinement statistics.a Values in parentheses are statistics for the highest-resolution shell, whose range is 1.63–1.60  Å. Rmerge=ΣhklΣi|I,−〈I〉|/ΣhklΣiI where I=observed intensity and 〈I〉=average intensity for multiple measurements. Rfree was monitored with 5% of the reflection data excluded from the refinement.

Results and discussion

A comparative analysis of amino acid sequences of archaeal HSDs showed that StHSD is 304 amino acids long and that the gene is likely to start with a UUG initiation codon. This initiation codon usage is rarely found in S. tokodaii [17]. The hypothetical initiation codon (UUG) was mutated to AUG, and the resultant ORF was overproduced in E. coli. The crude enzyme showed a specific activity of 0.020 U/mg. The activity of purified StHSD increased up to 2.5-fold with the increase of DTT concentration (Fig. 1). There was no significant dose-dependent effect on the activity in the presence of more than 0.8 mM DTT. The addition of more than 0.1 mM DTT gave a small, nonenzymatic increase of the background absorbance. Such background absorbance can probably be attributed to the reduction of WST-1 by DTT to form WST-1 formazan. The comparison of kinetic parameters between the oxidized and reduced enzymes showed that the reduction increased the Km and Vmax values for l-homoserine, but gave relatively small effect on Km and the Vmax values for NAD (Table 2). Since StHSD (304 total amino acid residues) has only one cysteine residue (C303), near the C-terminus, we postulated that the activation of enzyme is induced by reductive cleavage of an interchain disulfide bond between the two subunits. Alteration of activity by reductive cleavage of an intrachain disulfide bond by DTT has been found in the bifunctional HSD from E. coli K-12 [18]. In this case, the addition of DTT activates the enzyme and increases the sensitivity of HSD to inhibition by the feedback modifier l-threonine.
Fig. 1

Activation of StHSD. The activity of StHSD was assayed in the presence of various concentrations of DTT. The error bars represent the standard deviations of the measurements. One unit of the enzyme was defined as the amount of the enzyme that produced 1 μmol of WST-1 formazan at 303 K in 1 min.

Table 2

Kinetic parameters of the oxidized and the reduced forms.

Substratel-Homoserine
NAD
Km (mM)Vmax (U/mg)Km (mM)Vmax (U/mg)
Oxidized form0.210.810.311.0
Reduced form0.541.80.331.3

The oxidized and the reduced forms were prepared by the pre-treatment of StHSD with 0.1 mM potassium ferricyanide or 1 mM DTT, respectively, for 2 h. The values are calculated based on Lineweaver–Burk plot. One unit of the enzyme was defined as the amount of the enzyme that produced 1 μmol of NADH at 323 K in 1 min.

Activation of StHSD. The activity of StHSD was assayed in the presence of various concentrations of DTT. The error bars represent the standard deviations of the measurements. One unit of the enzyme was defined as the amount of the enzyme that produced 1 μmol of WST-1 formazan at 303 K in 1 min. Kinetic parameters of the oxidized and the reduced forms. The oxidized and the reduced forms were prepared by the pre-treatment of StHSD with 0.1 mM potassium ferricyanide or 1 mM DTT, respectively, for 2 h. The values are calculated based on Lineweaver–Burk plot. One unit of the enzyme was defined as the amount of the enzyme that produced 1 μmol of NADH at 323 K in 1 min. The crystal analysis of StHSD showed the overall structure of a homodimer with one disulfide bond in the asymmetric unit (Fig. 2). Each monomer of StHSD is composed of the nucleotide-binding region (amino acid residues 1–130 and 285–304), the dimerization region (residues 131–145 and 256–284), and the catalytic region (residues 146–255), as in the HSD from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (PDB entry 1EBU) [19]. The nucleotide-binding and catalytic regions are structurally well conserved among the equivalent regions of structurally characterized HSDs, although no significant structural homolog of the dimerization region was detected using the DALI database. A trigonal-bipyramidally coordinated sodium ion was located between the subunits of the oxidized form, though this location is apart from the equivalent position of the metal-binding site in HSD from S. cerevisiae[19].
Fig. 2

The structure of StHSD in the dimeric form. The nucleotide-binding region (residues 1–130 and 285–304), the dimerization region (residues 131–145 and 256–284), and the catalytic region (residues 146–255) are shown in yellow, magenta, and cyan, respectively. The other monomer is shown in gray. The disulfide bond between the two cysteine 303 residues is shown as red spheres. The sodium ion is shown as a gray sphere.

The structure of StHSD in the dimeric form. The nucleotide-binding region (residues 1–130 and 285–304), the dimerization region (residues 131–145 and 256–284), and the catalytic region (residues 146–255) are shown in yellow, magenta, and cyan, respectively. The other monomer is shown in gray. The disulfide bond between the two cysteine 303 residues is shown as red spheres. The sodium ion is shown as a gray sphere. In the crystal, an intermolecular disulfide bond was found to be formed between the cysteine 303 residues in the C-terminal regions of the monomers. In contrast, the cleavage of the disulfide bond in the reduced form of StHSD was observed (Fig. 3). The sulfur atoms of C303 in the reduced form refined at 1.80 Å resolution are separated by the distance of 2.9 Å which is significantly larger than the distance between the sulfur atoms of the disulfide bond (2.2 Å) in the oxidized form refined at 1.60 Å. Considering that the reducing reagent DTT activates StHSD by decreasing the Km value for l-homoserine, the activation may be due to increased flexibility in the structure of the subunit, especially in the l-homoserine-binding site.
Fig. 3

Cleavage of the disulfide bond. The disulfide bond between residues C303 was found without the oxidation by the addition of 0.1 mM potassium ferricyanide. The bond was cleavaged by the soaking in the presence of 50 mM DTT for 60 min prior to the first diffraction data collection.

Cleavage of the disulfide bond. The disulfide bond between residues C303 was found without the oxidation by the addition of 0.1 mM potassium ferricyanide. The bond was cleavaged by the soaking in the presence of 50 mM DTT for 60 min prior to the first diffraction data collection. The C-terminal region of the long-chain group of HSDs from C. glutamicum is necessary for its allosteric inhibition by l-threonine [4]. Although StHSD has no extension at the C-terminus and belongs to the short-chain group, the activity of StHSD may be affected by the conformation of the C-terminal region. This hypothesis is consistent with the fact that the nucleotide-binding region including the C-terminal region of the HSD from S. cerevisiae slightly alters the active site geometry upon cofactor binding for the appearance of activity [19]. Among the known primary sequences of HSDs, the cysteine residue near the C-terminus is present in only the Sulfolobus solfataricus and Sulfolobus islandicus enzymes, indicating that these two archaeal HSDs may form intermolecular disulfide bonds and be activated by the addition of reducing agents, such as DTT, though the physiological implication of this observation remains unknown.
  19 in total

1.  SFCHECK: a unified set of procedures for evaluating the quality of macromolecular structure-factor data and their agreement with the atomic model.

Authors:  A A Vaguine; J Richelle; S J Wodak
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  1999-01-01

2.  Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation.

Authors:  Simon C Lovell; Ian W Davis; W Bryan Arendall; Paul I W de Bakker; J Michael Word; Michael G Prisant; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-02-15

3.  Crystal structures of homoserine dehydrogenase suggest a novel catalytic mechanism for oxidoreductases.

Authors:  B DeLaBarre; P R Thompson; G D Wright; A M Berghuis
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-03

4.  Divergent transcriptional and translational signals in Archaea.

Authors:  Elfar Torarinsson; Hans-Peter Klenk; Roger A Garrett
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 5.  Cohesion group approach for evolutionary analysis of aspartokinase, an enzyme that feeds a branched network of many biochemical pathways.

Authors:  Chien-Chi Lo; Carol A Bonner; Gary Xie; Mark D'Souza; Roy A Jensen
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Lysine and arginine biosyntheses mediated by a common carrier protein in Sulfolobus.

Authors:  Takuya Ouchi; Takeo Tomita; Akira Horie; Ayako Yoshida; Kento Takahashi; Hiromi Nishida; Kerstin Lassak; Hikari Taka; Reiko Mineki; Tsutomu Fujimura; Saori Kosono; Chiharu Nishiyama; Ryoji Masui; Seiki Kuramitsu; Sonja-Verena Albers; Tomohisa Kuzuyama; Makoto Nishiyama
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 15.040

7.  Studies on homoserine dehydrogenase from an extreme thermophile, Thermus flavus AT-62. Partial purification and properties.

Authors:  T Saiki; H Shinshi; K Arima
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 3.387

Review 8.  Molecular control mechanisms of lysine and threonine biosynthesis in amino acid-producing corynebacteria: redirecting carbon flow.

Authors:  M Malumbres; J F Martín
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  A C-terminal deletion in Corynebacterium glutamicum homoserine dehydrogenase abolishes allosteric inhibition by L-threonine.

Authors:  J A Archer; D E Solow-Cordero; A J Sinskey
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1991-10-30       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  phenix.mr_rosetta: molecular replacement and model rebuilding with Phenix and Rosetta.

Authors:  Thomas C Terwilliger; Frank Dimaio; Randy J Read; David Baker; Gábor Bunkóczi; Paul D Adams; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Pavel V Afonine; Nathaniel Echols
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2012-03-15
View more
  2 in total

1.  Conformational changes in the catalytic region are responsible for heat-induced activation of hyperthermophilic homoserine dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kubota; Erika Kurihara; Kazuya Watanabe; Kohei Ogata; Ryosuke Kaneko; Masaru Goto; Toshihisa Ohshima; Kazuaki Yoshimune
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-07-14

2.  Inhibition of homoserine dehydrogenase by formation of a cysteine-NAD covalent complex.

Authors:  Kohei Ogata; Yui Yajima; Sanenori Nakamura; Ryosuke Kaneko; Masaru Goto; Toshihisa Ohshima; Kazuaki Yoshimune
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.