Literature DB >> 29124105

Measuring brain synaptic vesicle protein 2A with positron emission tomography and [18F]UCB-H.

Mohamed Ali Bahri1, Alain Plenevaux1, Joël Aerts1, Christine Bastin1, Guillaume Becker1, Joël Mercier2, Anne Valade2, Tim Buchanan2, Nathalie Mestdagh2, Didier Ledoux3, Alain Seret1, André Luxen1, Eric Salmon1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Brain distribution of synaptic vesicle protein 2A was measured with fluorine-18 UCB-H ([18F]UCB-H) and positron emission tomography (PET).
METHODS: Images of synaptic density were acquired in healthy volunteers (two young participants and two seniors). Input function was measured by arterial blood sampling (arterial input function) and derived from PET images using carotid activity (image-derived input function). Logan graphical analysis was used to estimate regional synaptic vesicle protein 2A distribution volume.
RESULTS: [18F]UCB-H uptake was ubiquitous in cortical and subcortical gray matter. Arterial input function and image-derived input function provided regional distribution volume with a high linear relationship. DISCUSSION: The cerebral distribution of [18F]UCB-H is similar to that recently observed with carbon-11 UCB-J ([11C]UCB-J). An accurate [18F]UCB-H quantification can be performed without invasive arterial blood sampling when no suitable reference region is available, using dynamic PET carotid activity. Brain synaptic density can be studied in vivo in normal and pathological aging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer's disease; Fluorine-18; Neuroimaging; PET; SV2A; Synapse density

Year:  2017        PMID: 29124105      PMCID: PMC5671624          DOI: 10.1016/j.trci.2017.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)        ISSN: 2352-8737


Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by abnormal brain deposits of amyloid β and neurofibrillary tangles with hyperphosphorylated tau and by loss of synapses [1]. There is a complex relationship between brain protein processing and synaptic functioning [2]. New AD models suggest that abnormal protein deposits and synaptic dysfunction occur many years before AD dementia is diagnosed [3], [4]. Different neuroimaging measurements are taken as biomarkers in AD models. Yet a reliable neuroimaging measure of synaptic loss is still needed. Synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) is a glycoprotein present in the membranes of most brain synaptic vesicles. Its physiological role is still debated [5]. SV2A is the therapeutic target of levetiracetam, an antiepileptic drug modifying the natural course of epilepsy in several models [6]. The role of SV2A in AD is particularly interesting. SV2A has been found to be reduced postmortem in the hippocampal structures of patients with dementia [7]. Levetiracetam restored dysfunctional networks in a mouse model of AD [8]. Moreover, it improved cognition and decreased hippocampal hyperactivity in patients in the predementia stage of AD [9]. [18F]UCB-H is an original biomarker showing binding specificity for SV2A ([10], [11]; Supplementary Data). In a rat microPET (micro positron emission tomography) study, the total distribution volume (Vt) of [18F]UCB-H in the brain was calculated and the test-retest reproducibility was about 10% [11]. Levetiracetam induced dose-dependent blocking and displacement of cerebral [18F]UCB-H uptake. Radiodosimetry was performed in mice [12] and humans [13]. In this study of [18F]UCB-H in healthy volunteers, we characterized its blood-brain pharmacokinetics. SV2A is a suitable marker of synaptic density, and we discuss its brain distribution and modeling properties compared to the recently published SV2A tracer [11C]UCB-J [14]. SV2A is ubiquitous in the brain. There is no “reference region” without binding sites for [18F]UCB, and an arterial blood input function (arterial input function [AIF]) is required for quantifying regional distribution of the radiotracer. An original method using image-derived carotid artery activity is shown to be comparable to classical modeling with AIF.

Methods

Participants

Two young (38 and 46 years) and two senior (66 and 69 years) healthy male volunteers participated in this study (EudraCT 2011-003413-42). Subjects' suitability for participation was determined by interview, physical examination, clinical blood laboratory tests, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and urine drug screening (see Supplementary Data for inclusion/exclusion criteria). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Liege University Hospital (Belgium). All participants signed an informed consent form.

Image acquisition

Dynamic PET acquisitions were performed using a Siemens/CTI (Knoxville, TN) ECAT HR+ PET scanner. About 170.4 ± 24.9 MBq of [18F]UCB-H was injected as an intravenous bolus. The timeframe of the dynamic PET was 6 × 10, 8 × 30, 5 × 120 and 17 × 300 seconds, resulting in 100-minutes scanning time. All PET images were reconstructed using filtered backprojection including corrections for measured attenuation, dead time, random events, and scatter using standard software (ECAT 7.1, Siemens/CTI, Knoxville, TN). A structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image acquired for each subject a few days before PET study (3–10 days) was used to exclude any brain abnormality and to facilitate coregistration of PET data to the standard Montreal Neurological Institute space for brain structures segmentation. MRI data were acquired on a 3T Allegra Siemens scanner (three-dimensional modified driven equilibrium Fourier transform [MDEFT] sequence) with the following parameters: TR = 7.92 ms, TE = 2.4 ms, TI = 910 ms, FA = 15°, FOV = 256 × 224 × 176 mm3, and isotropic spatial resolution = 1 mm.

Image quantification

In our analysis plan, we first searched for a suitable input function (IF), and we then searched for a suitable modeling approach. To measure AIF, blood samples were collected through a cubital artery cannula. AIF was obtained by correcting plasma data for the unchanged tracer fraction determined using high performance liquid chromatography ([11]; Supplementary Data). However, an arterial cannula cannot be used to study patient cohorts. Since brain SV2A is ubiquitous, it is improbable that a suitable reference region can be found to model radiotracer distribution. Here, we derived IF from dynamic PET images (image-derived input function [IDIF]) using the method described by Schain et al. [15]. The method extracts time series of [18F]UCB-H in the carotid artery by identifying voxels belonging to the carotid. This is based on the computation of the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient between a “seeding region” (a group of voxels in the carotid) and voxels in a mask containing the carotid (except those used as the seeding region). The extracted time series (IDIF) was then scaled to plasma radioactivity using the last three blood samples and corrected using mean unchanged plasma fractions. The detailed method is reported as Supplementary Data. PET data were processed with SPM12 (Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London, UK). For each subject, PET dynamic frames were corrected for movement. The structural MRI image was coregistered to its PET image (sum of the dynamic data) without reslicing. The resulting MRI image was segmented and normalization transformation parameters (forward and inverse: transformation parameters used to bring images to the Montreal Neurological Institute stereotactic space) were calculated. The inverse transformation was used to bring the Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL) human brain atlas into the PET subject space and extract the time activity curves of all AAL brain atlas regions. Kinetic modeling using both AIF and IDIF was done with PMOD (Version 3.7, PMOD Technologies, Zurich, Switzerland). Since the AAL atlas did not contain white matter (WM) regions, a centrum semiovale region was created using SPM WM probability map. This map was thresholded (>99.6%) to obtain only voxels with the highest WM membership.

Statistical analyses

The similarity between AIF and IDIF was assessed by comparing the area under the curve, searching for a ratio around 1. Moreover, IFs were also fitted using a biexponential model, and the slopes of the IFs were compared using a nonparametric Wilcoxon test. Three kinetic models, 1-tissue compartment (1TC), 2-tissue compartment (2TC), and Logan graphical analysis were used to calculate the Vt of [18F]UCB-H in the brain. The three models were compared in terms of stability of estimate over regions (whether the model can fit all regions without failure) and the accuracy of the experimental data fitting (goodness-of-fit: R2; visual comparison: how close the model curve is to the measurement).

Results

PET images averaged over 100 minutes (Fig. 1) revealed a heterogeneous but ubiquitous tracer uptake in subcortical and cortical gray matter regions. [18F]UCB-H brain kinetics were rapid, with an initial high uptake and a standardized uptake value peak (expressed as brain activity normalized to injected dose and body weight) of 5 to 10 across brain regions 10 minutes after injection, followed by rapid decline in regional radioactivity over time (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

PET image of the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A)–specific tracer [18F]UCB-H in a healthy volunteer (average of dynamic images: subject 1, young participant). Radioactivity expressed as standardized uptake value (SUV, normalized to the injected dose and body weight).

Fig. 2

Time activity curves (TACs) for the selected brain regions of subject 1 (mean left and right hemispheres). Activity expressed as standardized uptake value (SUV).

PET image of the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A)–specific tracer [18F]UCB-H in a healthy volunteer (average of dynamic images: subject 1, young participant). Radioactivity expressed as standardized uptake value (SUV, normalized to the injected dose and body weight). Time activity curves (TACs) for the selected brain regions of subject 1 (mean left and right hemispheres). Activity expressed as standardized uptake value (SUV). Blood data analysis showed a consistent tracer amount in whole blood and plasma indicating low binding to red blood cells. Unchanged [18F]UCB-H fraction in plasma followed a 3-exponential decrease with a starting fraction of 97 ± 2% (mean ± SD) measured 3 minutes after injection. This fraction was subsequently measured at 5, 15, 35, 60, and 90 minutes and decreased to 85 ± 17%, 37 ± 14%, 30 ± 13%, 21 ± 8%, and 17 ± 8%, respectively. Scaled IDIF was found to be very similar to AIF, with a mean ratio of area under the curve of 1.02 ± 0.08. This was true for plasma and whole blood AIF (Table 1). Moreover, the comparison of slope constants of the biexponential fit for the IFs, which provide an indication of the instantaneous level of blood radioactivity, showed similar values for AIF and IDIF, especially for the second slope constant (Z = 1.82, P > .06; Table 2).
Table 1

Area under the curve ratio between manual blood sampling and image-derived carotid blood activity

VariablesSubjects
MeanSDCOV
S1AUCrS2AUCrS3AUCrS4AUCr
Unfitted IF
 Plasma/IDIF0.9810.9231.1191.0511.0180.0858.342
 MFB/IDIF0.9440.9681.0530.9840.9870.0474.752
Fitted IF
 Plasma/IDIF1.0680.9780.9341.0491.0080.0626.189
 MFB/IDIF1.0311.0090.9071.0060.9880.0555.599

Abbreviations: AUCr, area under the curve ratio; COV, coefficient of variation; IF, input function; IDIF, image-derived IF scaled to three plasma last samples; MFB, measured full blood activity; plasma, measured plasma activity; S1 to S4, participants; SD, standard deviation.

Table 2

Biexponential fit slope constants for manually sampled and image-derived input functions

VariablesSubjects
MeanSD
S1S2S3S4
Slope 1
 MFB2.2682.5213.5756.0963.6151.748
 Plasma2.1162.5183.8466.2503.6831.864
 IDIF1.8051.6193.4324.1132.7421.224
Slope 2
 MFB0.0030.0090.0310.0100.0130.012
 Plasma0.0020.0100.0340.0100.0140.014
 IDIF0.0020.0090.0100.0070.0070.004

Abbreviations: IDIF, image-derived input function scaled to last three plasma samples; MFB, measured full blood activity; plasma, measured plasma activity; S1 to S4, participants; SD, standard deviation.

Area under the curve ratio between manual blood sampling and image-derived carotid blood activity Abbreviations: AUCr, area under the curve ratio; COV, coefficient of variation; IF, input function; IDIF, image-derived IF scaled to three plasma last samples; MFB, measured full blood activity; plasma, measured plasma activity; S1 to S4, participants; SD, standard deviation. Biexponential fit slope constants for manually sampled and image-derived input functions Abbreviations: IDIF, image-derived input function scaled to last three plasma samples; MFB, measured full blood activity; plasma, measured plasma activity; S1 to S4, participants; SD, standard deviation. The three kinetic models (1TC, 2TC, and Logan) led to a consistent estimation of Vt. The 1TC gave a weak fitting of the data (measurement did not lie on the model curve, R2: 0.95), whereas the 2TC model fitted the data well (R2: 0.98) and provided total and specific values for distribution volume of the tracer, but not for all regions (few failures to fit experimental data). In contrast, Logan graphical model provided reliable Vt estimates with suitable fits (R2: 0.99) and reasonable start time (t* ranged between 15 and 30 minutes). Thus, Logan graphical model was chosen as the preferential method for analysis of the data using both AIF and IDIF and with a t* of 25 minutes (mean value over all regions and subjects). An estimate of the IF delay was included in the model to optimize its fit. A high linear relationship (R2 > 0.99; slope: 1.013 ± 0.080) was observed between Vt values obtained with AIF and IDIF (Fig. 3). Mean Vt values ranged from 4.3 mL/cm3 in the centrum semiovale to 7.8 mL/cm3 in the gyrus rectus for both AIF and IDIF analyses. The single reserve was that Vt coefficients of variation were moderately higher for IDIF (17± 2%) than for AIF analysis (12 ± 2%). Supplementary Fig. 1 depicts regional Vt in the left cerebral hemisphere. Vt showed increasing values from the WM to the cerebellum, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, parietal cortex, precuneus, frontal regions, amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, and putamen (Fig. 4). Referring to Finnema et al.'s study with [11C]UCB-J [14], we calculated binding potential (BPND) using WM as pseudo-reference (representing nondisplaceable free and nonspecific binding). Unexpectedly, older participants had a higher BPND than younger ones (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3

Input function (IF) evaluation for [18F]UCB-H tracer: (A) [18F]UCB-H in blood (MFB, measured full blood) and in plasma (S1, subject 1). Radioactivity in Becquerel per cubic centimeter (Bq/cc); (B) Mean unchanged [18F]UCB-H in plasma for the four participants. SD, standard deviation; (C) Image-derived input function (IDIF) scaled to match the plasma measures using the last three plasma values and measured plasma IF (plasma; subject 1); (D) Scatter plot representing distribution volumes obtained with image-derived IF (Vt) versus distribution volumes obtained with arterial IF (Vt). S1 to S4 are participants. Distribution volumes were estimated using the Logan graphical analysis method for all Automated Anatomical Labeling brain atlas regions. We could not find any clinical or paraclinical information to explain the difference between S2 and the other volunteers.

Fig. 4

PET quantitative data of [18F]UCB-H tracer in a healthy human brain: (A) regional volumes of distribution (Vt in mL per cubic centimeter) obtained by the Logan graphical analysis model applied to time-activity curves using arterial input function (AIF, means ± SD, n = 2 for each group); (B) BPND values (binding potential calculated using centrum semiovale region with “nondisplaceable” activity) calculated as Vt(region)/Vt(centrum_semiovale)−1.

Input function (IF) evaluation for [18F]UCB-H tracer: (A) [18F]UCB-H in blood (MFB, measured full blood) and in plasma (S1, subject 1). Radioactivity in Becquerel per cubic centimeter (Bq/cc); (B) Mean unchanged [18F]UCB-H in plasma for the four participants. SD, standard deviation; (C) Image-derived input function (IDIF) scaled to match the plasma measures using the last three plasma values and measured plasma IF (plasma; subject 1); (D) Scatter plot representing distribution volumes obtained with image-derived IF (Vt) versus distribution volumes obtained with arterial IF (Vt). S1 to S4 are participants. Distribution volumes were estimated using the Logan graphical analysis method for all Automated Anatomical Labeling brain atlas regions. We could not find any clinical or paraclinical information to explain the difference between S2 and the other volunteers. PET quantitative data of [18F]UCB-H tracer in a healthy human brain: (A) regional volumes of distribution (Vt in mL per cubic centimeter) obtained by the Logan graphical analysis model applied to time-activity curves using arterial input function (AIF, means ± SD, n = 2 for each group); (B) BPND values (binding potential calculated using centrum semiovale region with “nondisplaceable” activity) calculated as Vt(region)/Vt(centrum_semiovale)−1.

Discussion

[18F]UCB-H has been used as a biomarker for SV2A [11]. A recent publication using [11C]UCB-J (a similar derivative of levetiracetam) showed a correlation between in vivo brain radiotracer binding and postmortem measures of brain SV2A in a baboon study [14]. Full quantification of [18F]UCB-H binding through kinetic modeling was possible in the absence of a reference region devoid of specific tracer binding [16]. [18F]UCB-H was shown to have negligible amount of radiometabolites in the rat brain [17]. Although [18F]UCB-H uptake observed in WM is relatively low, making it a candidate for a reference region in young people [14], WM is altered by AD [18], [19], calling into question the value of WM as a pseudo-reference for older participants. Moreover, [18F]UCB-H binding in pons was displaced with levetiracetam at 10 mg/kg in rats [11]. Therefore, an image-derived carotid signal was preferred as the IF for complete kinetic modeling. The IDIF result closely matched the result derived by manual arterial blood sampling (the “gold standard”). [18F]UCB-H brain uptake confirmed the ubiquitous cerebral distribution of SV2A [11], [14], [20]. A Logan graphical model was used to describe brain accumulation, whereas a 1TC was chosen for modeling [11C]UCB-J [14]. Although the two tracers are quite similar, Vt values are higher with [11C]UCB-J (5–22 ml/cc) than with [18F]UCB-H (3–10 ml/cc), whereas [18F]UCB-H has a longer half-life for performing population studies. Investigation of [18F]UCB-H distribution in medial temporal structures, the default mode network, and the anterior cingulate cortex would be particularly interesting to explore the temporal relationship between brain amyloid and tau pathology and brain synaptic loss in AD [4], [21] or study frontotemporal dementia [22]. Owing to the demanding PET protocol (arterial blood sampling, very selective inclusion criteria), only four subjects were recruited for this study. The mean parent fraction was used to correct IFs for metabolites, and this profile should be measured in venous blood for different patient groups. The time activity curves suggest that scan duration, another limitation, might be reduced to 50 minutes while retaining appropriate “Logan-modeling” properties. Finally, image correction for partial volume effects should be discussed in any patient study. In conclusion, our results suggest that [18F]UCB-H is a good candidate as radiotracer for brain SV2A and can be used for human studies. IDIF was showed to be useful for quantitative studies without the need to arterial blood sampling. Systematic review: Brain synapses can be measured using a PET radiotracer specific to synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A). [18F]UCB-H brain distribution was quantified in healthy volunteers and compared to recently published data on [11C]UCB-J. Interpretation: SV2A was seen in all subcortical and cortical cerebral gray matter structures. Temporal structures were particularly well delineated with [18F]UCB-H as with [11C]UCB-J. Volumes of distribution could be obtained using an input function derived from PET dynamic activity in carotid, with results similar to a standard arterial blood input function. Future directions: [18F]UCB-H is suitable to non-invasively explore human brain synaptic density in normal and pathological conditions, such as very early Alzheimer's disease.
  22 in total

Review 1.  Synaptic vesicle protein 2A: basic facts and role in synaptic function.

Authors:  Julieta Griselda Mendoza-Torreblanca; América Vanoye-Carlo; Bryan Víctor Phillips-Farfán; Liliana Carmona-Aparicio; Gisela Gómez-Lira
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies.

Authors:  A A Lammertsma; S P Hume
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Discovery of heterocyclic nonacetamide synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) ligands with single-digit nanomolar potency: opening avenues towards the first SV2A positron emission tomography (PET) ligands.

Authors:  Joël Mercier; Laurence Archen; Véronique Bollu; Stéphane Carré; Yves Evrard; Eric Jnoff; Benoît Kenda; Bénédicte Lallemand; Philippe Michel; Florian Montel; Florence Moureau; Nathalie Price; Yannick Quesnel; Xavier Sauvage; Anne Valade; Laurent Provins
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Divergent network connectivity changes in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; Michael D Greicius; Efstathios D Gennatas; Matthew E Growdon; Jung Y Jang; Gil D Rabinovici; Joel H Kramer; Michael Weiner; Bruce L Miller; William W Seeley
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Imaging synaptic density in the living human brain.

Authors:  Sjoerd J Finnema; Nabeel B Nabulsi; Tore Eid; Kamil Detyniecki; Shu-Fei Lin; Ming-Kai Chen; Roni Dhaher; David Matuskey; Evan Baum; Daniel Holden; Dennis D Spencer; Joël Mercier; Jonas Hannestad; Yiyun Huang; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  Differential expression of synaptic vesicle protein 2 (SV2) isoforms.

Authors:  S M Bajjalieh; G D Frantz; J M Weimann; S K McConnell; R H Scheller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Perforant path synaptic loss correlates with cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease in the oldest-old.

Authors:  John L Robinson; Laura Molina-Porcel; Maria M Corrada; Kevin Raible; Edward B Lee; Virginia M-Y Lee; Claudia H Kawas; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Levetiracetam suppresses neuronal network dysfunction and reverses synaptic and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer's disease model.

Authors:  Pascal E Sanchez; Lei Zhu; Laure Verret; Keith A Vossel; Anna G Orr; John R Cirrito; Nino Devidze; Kaitlyn Ho; Gui-Qiu Yu; Jorge J Palop; Lennart Mucke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Arterial input function derived from pairwise correlations between PET-image voxels.

Authors:  Martin Schain; Simon Benjaminsson; Katarina Varnäs; Anton Forsberg; Christer Halldin; Anders Lansner; Lars Farde; Andrea Varrone
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  A white matter disorder in dementia of the Alzheimer type: a pathoanatomical study.

Authors:  A Brun; E Englund
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  14 in total

1.  Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of [18F]UCB-J for PET imaging of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A).

Authors:  Songye Li; Zhengxin Cai; Wenjie Zhang; Daniel Holden; Shu-Fei Lin; Sjoerd J Finnema; Anupama Shirali; Jim Ropchan; Stephane Carre; Joel Mercier; Richard E Carson; Nabeel Nabulsi; Yiyun Huang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  In vivo imaging of synaptic loss in Alzheimer's disease with [18F]UCB-H positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Christine Bastin; Mohamed Ali Bahri; François Meyer; Marine Manard; Emma Delhaye; Alain Plenevaux; Guillaume Becker; Alain Seret; Christine Mella; Fabrice Giacomelli; Christian Degueldre; Evelyne Balteau; André Luxen; Eric Salmon
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Quantification of [18F]UCB-H Binding in the Rat Brain: From Kinetic Modelling to Standardised Uptake Value.

Authors:  Maria Elisa Serrano; Mohamed Ali Bahri; Guillaume Becker; Alain Seret; Frédéric Mievis; Fabrice Giacomelli; Christian Lemaire; Eric Salmon; André Luxen; Alain Plenevaux
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Novel Tracers and Radionuclides in PET Imaging.

Authors:  Christian Mason; Grayson R Gimblet; Suzanne E Lapi; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.947

5.  [18F]BIBD-181: A Novel Positron Emission Tomography Tracer Specific for Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A.

Authors:  Zeng Jiang; Xuebo Cheng; Hualong Chen; Wei Zheng; Yuli Sun; Ziyue Yu; Tingyu Yang; Lu Zhang; Di Fan; Zhihao Yang; Yajing Liu; Lin Ai; Zehui Wu
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.632

Review 6.  PET imaging of synaptic density: A new tool for investigation of neuropsychiatric diseases.

Authors:  Zhengxin Cai; Songye Li; David Matuskey; Nabeel Nabulsi; Yiyun Huang
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Development and In Vivo Preclinical Imaging of Fluorine-18-Labeled Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2A (SV2A) PET Tracers.

Authors:  Cristian C Constantinescu; Cedric Tresse; MingQiang Zheng; Alexandra Gouasmat; Vincent M Carroll; Laetitia Mistico; David Alagille; Christine M Sandiego; Caroline Papin; Kenneth Marek; John P Seibyl; Gilles D Tamagnan; Olivier Barret
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  The Rise of Synaptic Density PET Imaging.

Authors:  Guillaume Becker; Sylvestre Dammicco; Mohamed Ali Bahri; Eric Salmon
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Evaluating the In Vivo Specificity of [18F]UCB-H for the SV2A Protein, Compared with SV2B and SV2C in Rats Using microPET.

Authors:  Maria Elisa Serrano; Guillaume Becker; Mohamed Ali Bahri; Alain Seret; Nathalie Mestdagh; Joël Mercier; Frédéric Mievis; Fabrice Giacomelli; Christian Lemaire; Eric Salmon; André Luxen; Alain Plenevaux
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Advances in CNS PET: the state-of-the-art for new imaging targets for pathophysiology and drug development.

Authors:  Stuart P McCluskey; Christophe Plisson; Eugenii A Rabiner; Oliver Howes
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.