| Literature DB >> 29123583 |
Miguel A Gómez-Álvarez1, Leonardo S Lino-Silva2, Rosa A Salcedo-Hernández1, Alejandro Padilla-Rosciano1, Erika B Ruiz-García3, Horacio N López-Basave1, German Calderillo-Ruiz3, José M Aguilar-Romero4, Jorge A Domínguez-Rodríguez4, Ángel Herrera-Gómez1, Abelardo Meneses-García2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Colorectal medullary carcinoma (MC) is a rare subtype of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA) with unclear prognostic significance. Microsatellite instable (MSI) colorectal carcinomas have demonstrated better prognosis in clinical stage II. AIM: To analyze the survival and clinicopathological characteristics of MCs versus PDAs with MSI in clinical stage III.Entities:
Keywords: cancer; colorectal; medullary carcinoma; microsatellite instability; survival
Year: 2016 PMID: 29123583 PMCID: PMC5672702 DOI: 10.5114/pg.2016.64740
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prz Gastroenterol ISSN: 1895-5770
Figure 1Morphologic characteristics of medullary carcinoma. Architectural solid nest of neoplastic cells (A) with round nuclei with coarse chromatin (B)
Antibodies used in the immunohistochemical studies
| Antibody (Clone) | Source | Dilution | Antigen retrieval |
|---|---|---|---|
| MLH1 (ES05) | Dako, Carpintera, CA | 1 : 50 | Heat (EDTA), 15 min |
| MSH2 (FE11) | Dako, Carpintera, CA | 1 : 50 | Heat (EDTA), 15 min |
| MSH6 (EP49) | Dako, Carpintera, CA | 1 : 50 | Heat (EDTA), 15 min |
| PSM2 (EP51) | Dako, Carpintera, CA | 1 : 40 | Heat (EDTA), 15 min |
| P53 (DO07) | Dako, Carpintera, CA | 1 : 100 | Heat (EDTA), 15 min |
Clinicopathologic characteristics of medullary carcinomas compared with conventional adenocarcinomas
| Parameter | Medullary carcinoma, | Conventional adenocarcinoma, |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender: | 0.409 | ||
| Female | 3 (30) | 10 (45.5) | |
| Male | 7 (70) | 12 (54.5) | |
| CEA seric level: | 0.811 | ||
| Normal | 5 (50) | 12 (54.5) | |
| Elevated | 5 (50) | 10 (45.5) | |
| Site: | 0.050 | ||
| Right colon | 9 (90) | 12 (54.5) | |
| Transverse/left colon | 1 (10) | 10 (45.5) | |
| Tumor invasion: | 0.056 | ||
| pT2 | 2 (20) | 0 | |
| pT3 | 5 (50) | 15 (68.2) | |
| pT4a | 3 (30) | 3 (13.6) | |
| pT4b | 0 | 4 (18.2) | |
| Lymph node stage: | 0.160 | ||
| pN0 | 3 (30) | 1 (4.5) | |
| pN1a | 1 (10) | 5 (22.7) | |
| pN1b | 4 (40) | 7 (31.8) | |
| pN2a | 0 | 5 (22.7) | |
| pN2b | 2 (20) | 4 (18.2) | |
| Lymph node metastasis: | 0.044 | ||
| No | 3 (30) | 1 (4.5) | |
| Yes | 7 (70) | 21 (95.5) | |
| Lymphovascular invasion: | 0.044 | ||
| No | 3 (30) | 15 (68.2) | |
| Yes | 7 (70) | 7 (31.8) | |
| Vascular invasion: | 0.354 | ||
| No | 10 (100) | 18 (81.8) | |
| Yes | 0 | 4 (18.2) | |
| Perineural invasión: | 0.325 | ||
| No | 10 (100) | 20 (90.9) | |
| Yes | 0 | 2 (9.1) | |
| Resection: | 0.777 | ||
| R0 | 9 (90) | 19 (86.4) | |
| R1 | 1 (10) | 3 (13.6) | |
| Recurrence: | 0.660 | ||
| No | 8 (80) | 16 (72.7) | |
| Yes | 2 (20) | 6 (27.3) | |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy: | 0.094 | ||
| No | 4 (40) | 3 (13.6) | |
| Yes | 6 (60) | 19 (86.4) | |
| Progression: | 0.488 | ||
| No | 7 (70) | 17 (77.3) | |
| Yes | 3 (30) | 5 (22.7) | |
| Death: | 0.660 | ||
| No | 7 (70) | 17 (77.3) | |
| Yes | 3 (30) | 5 (22.7) | |
| 5-year overall survival (%) | 42.9 | 76.6 | 0.048 |
| Age [years] | 57.8 ±5.6 | 75 ±16.1 | 0.074 |
| Tumor size [cm] | 9.6 ±4.1 | 6.4 ±3.2 | 0.035 |
CEA – carcinoembrionic antigen.
Figure 2Overall survival comparison between medullary carcinomas and poorly differentiated carcinomas
Figure 3Survival curves for recurrence (Kaplan-Meier method)
Univariate survival analysis
| Variable | χ2 value |
| Confident interval |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recurrence | 11.629 | 0.001 | 4.68–15.35 |
| Medullary type | 3.404 | 0.043 | 2.5–4.21 |
| Female sex | 3.176 | 0.075 | 1.5–3.0 |
| Right colon location | 3.0629 | 0.057 | 1.05–2.58 |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.109 | 0.741 | 0.58–1.36 |
| CEA level (high) | 0.788 | 0.375 | 0.53–1.02 |