James L Gentry1, David Carruthers1, Parag H Joshi1, Christopher D Maroules1, Colby R Ayers1, James A de Lemos1, Philip Aagaard1, Rory Hachamovitch1, Milind Y Desai1, Eric E Roselli1, Reginald E Dunn1, Kezia Alexander1, Andrew E Lincoln1, Andrew M Tucker1, Dermot M Phelan2. 1. From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH (J.L.G., P.A., R.H., M.Y.D., E.E.R., D.M.P.); Division of Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (D.C., P.H.J., C.D.M., C.R.A., J.A.d.L.); Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD (P.H.J.); and MedStar Sports Medicine Research Center, Baltimore, MD (R.E.D., K.A., A.E.L., A.M.T.). 2. From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH (J.L.G., P.A., R.H., M.Y.D., E.E.R., D.M.P.); Division of Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (D.C., P.H.J., C.D.M., C.R.A., J.A.d.L.); Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD (P.H.J.); and MedStar Sports Medicine Research Center, Baltimore, MD (R.E.D., K.A., A.E.L., A.M.T.). pheland@ccf.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ascending aortic dimensions are slightly larger in young competitive athletes compared with sedentary controls, but rarely >40 mm. Whether this finding translates to aortic enlargement in older, former athletes is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This cross-sectional study involved a sample of 206 former National Football League (NFL) athletes compared with 759 male subjects from the DHS-2 (Dallas Heart Study-2; mean age of 57.1 and 53.6 years, respectively, P<0.0001; body surface area of 2.4 and 2.1 m2, respectively, P<0.0001). Midascending aortic dimensions were obtained from computed tomographic scans performed as part of a NFL screening protocol or as part of the DHS. Compared with a population-based control group, former NFL athletes had significantly larger ascending aortic diameters (38±5 versus 34±4 mm; P<0.0001). A significantly higher proportion of former NFL athletes had an aorta of >40 mm (29.6% versus 8.6%; P<0.0001). After adjusting for age, race, body surface area, systolic blood pressure, history of hypertension, current smoking, diabetes mellitus, and lipid profile, the former NFL athletes still had significantly larger ascending aortas (P<0.0001). Former NFL athletes were twice as likely to have an aorta >40 mm after adjusting for the same parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Ascending aortic dimensions were significantly larger in a sample of former NFL athletes after adjusting for their size, age, race, and cardiac risk factors. Whether this translates to an increased risk is unknown and requires further evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Ascending aortic dimensions are slightly larger in young competitive athletes compared with sedentary controls, but rarely >40 mm. Whether this finding translates to aortic enlargement in older, former athletes is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This cross-sectional study involved a sample of 206 former National Football League (NFL) athletes compared with 759 male subjects from the DHS-2 (Dallas Heart Study-2; mean age of 57.1 and 53.6 years, respectively, P<0.0001; body surface area of 2.4 and 2.1 m2, respectively, P<0.0001). Midascending aortic dimensions were obtained from computed tomographic scans performed as part of a NFL screening protocol or as part of the DHS. Compared with a population-based control group, former NFL athletes had significantly larger ascending aortic diameters (38±5 versus 34±4 mm; P<0.0001). A significantly higher proportion of former NFL athletes had an aorta of >40 mm (29.6% versus 8.6%; P<0.0001). After adjusting for age, race, body surface area, systolic blood pressure, history of hypertension, current smoking, diabetes mellitus, and lipid profile, the former NFL athletes still had significantly larger ascending aortas (P<0.0001). Former NFL athletes were twice as likely to have an aorta >40 mm after adjusting for the same parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Ascending aortic dimensions were significantly larger in a sample of former NFL athletes after adjusting for their size, age, race, and cardiac risk factors. Whether this translates to an increased risk is unknown and requires further evaluation.
Authors: Victor Utomi; David Oxborough; Greg P Whyte; John Somauroo; Sanjay Sharma; Rob Shave; Greg Atkinson; Keith George Journal: Heart Date: 2013-03-09 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Stefano Caselli; Antonia Vaquer Segui; Filippo Quattrini; Barbara Di Gacinto; Alberto Milan; Riccardo Assorgi; Luisa Verdile; Antonio Spataro; Antonio Pelliccia Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2016-04-30 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Rory B Weiner; Francis Wang; Stephanie K Isaacs; Rajeev Malhotra; Brant Berkstresser; Jonathan H Kim; Adolph M Hutter; Michael H Picard; Thomas J Wang; Aaron L Baggish Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Timothy W Churchill; Supriya Krishnan; Marc Weisskopf; Brandon A Yates; Frank E Speizer; Jonathan H Kim; Lee E Nadler; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Ross Zafonte; Aaron L Baggish Journal: Am J Med Date: 2018-08-11 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Jason Tso; Casey Hollowed; Chang Liu; Ayman Alkhoder; Morgan Dommisse; Zaina Gowani; Arthur Miller; Grace Nguyen; Parker Nguyen; Ganesh Prabakaran; Mohamad Wehbe; Angelo Galante; Carla R Gilson; Craig Clark; Thomas Marshall; Gene Patterson; Arshed A Quyyumi; Aaron L Baggish; Jonathan H Kim Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2020-12
Authors: Philip Aagaard; Shishir Sharma; David A McNamara; Parag Joshi; Colby R Ayers; James A de Lemos; Andrew E Lincoln; Bryan Baranowski; Kyle Mandsager; Elizabeth Hill; Lon Castle; James Gentry; Richard Lang; Reginald E Dunn; Kezia Alexander; Andrew M Tucker; Dermot Phelan Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Jonathan H Kim; Ross Zafonte; Alvaro Pascuale-Leon; Lee M Nadler; Marc Weisskopf; Frank E Speizer; Herman A Taylor; Aaron L Baggish Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 5.501