Marta Bogowicz1, Ralph T H Leijenaar2, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang3, Oliver Riesterer3, Martin Pruschy3, Gabriela Studer3, Jan Unkelbach3, Matthias Guckenberger3, Ender Konukoglu4, Philippe Lambin2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: marta.bogowicz@usz.ch. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands; The D-Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland. 4. Computer Vision Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study investigated an association of post-radiochemotherapy (RCT) PET radiomics with local tumor control in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and evaluated the models against two radiomics software implementations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 649 features, available in two radiomics implementations and based on the same definitions, were extracted from HNSCC primary tumor region in 18F-FDG PET scans 3 months post definitive RCT (training cohort n = 128, validation cohort n = 50) and compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Local recurrence models were trained, separately for both implementations, using principal component analysis (PCA) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The reproducibility of the concordance indexes (CI) in univariable Cox regression for features preselected in PCA and the final multivariable models was investigated using respective features from the other implementation. RESULTS: Only 80 PET radiomic features yielded ICC > 0.8 in the comparison between the implementations. The change of implementation caused high variability of CI in the univariable analysis. However, both final multivariable models performed equally well in the training and validation cohorts (CI > 0.7) independent of radiomics implementation. CONCLUSION: The two post-RCT PET radiomic models, based on two different software implementations, were prognostic for local tumor control in HNSCC. However, 88% of the features was not reproducible between the implementations.
PURPOSE: This study investigated an association of post-radiochemotherapy (RCT) PET radiomics with local tumor control in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and evaluated the models against two radiomics software implementations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 649 features, available in two radiomics implementations and based on the same definitions, were extracted from HNSCC primary tumor region in 18F-FDG PET scans 3 months post definitive RCT (training cohort n = 128, validation cohort n = 50) and compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Local recurrence models were trained, separately for both implementations, using principal component analysis (PCA) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The reproducibility of the concordance indexes (CI) in univariable Cox regression for features preselected in PCA and the final multivariable models was investigated using respective features from the other implementation. RESULTS: Only 80 PET radiomic features yielded ICC > 0.8 in the comparison between the implementations. The change of implementation caused high variability of CI in the univariable analysis. However, both final multivariable models performed equally well in the training and validation cohorts (CI > 0.7) independent of radiomics implementation. CONCLUSION: The two post-RCT PET radiomic models, based on two different software implementations, were prognostic for local tumor control in HNSCC. However, 88% of the features was not reproducible between the implementations.
Authors: Anshu K Jain; Sanjay Aneja; Clifton D Fuller; Adam P Dicker; Caroline Chung; Erika Kim; Justin S Kirby; Harry Quon; Clara J K Lam; William C Louv; Chris Ahern; Ying Xiao; Todd R McNutt; Nadine Housri; Ronald D Ennis; John Kang; Ying Tang; Howard Higley; Michelle A Berny-Lang; Kevin A Camphausen Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2020-08
Authors: Robert H Press; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; James M Mountz; Brenda F Kurland; Richard L Wahl; Ella F Jones; Nola M Hylton; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Robert J Nordstrom; Lori Henderson; Karen A Kurdziel; Bhadrasain Vikram; Michael A Jacobs; Matthias Holdhoff; Edward Taylor; David A Jaffray; Lawrence H Schwartz; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan; Hannah M Linden; Philippe Lambin; Thomas J Dilling; Daniel L Rubin; Lubomir Hadjiiski; John M Buatti Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-06-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Maryam Gul; Kimberley-Jane C Bonjoc; David Gorlin; Chi Wah Wong; Amirah Salem; Vincent La; Aleksandr Filippov; Abbas Chaudhry; Muhammad H Imam; Ammar A Chaudhry Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Kyle J Lafata; Yushi Chang; Chunhao Wang; Yvonne M Mowery; Irina Vergalasova; Donna Niedzwiecki; David S Yoo; Jian-Guo Liu; David M Brizel; Fang-Fang Yin Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 4.506
Authors: Alex Zwanenburg; Martin Vallières; Mahmoud A Abdalah; Hugo J W L Aerts; Vincent Andrearczyk; Aditya Apte; Saeed Ashrafinia; Spyridon Bakas; Roelof J Beukinga; Ronald Boellaard; Marta Bogowicz; Luca Boldrini; Irène Buvat; Gary J R Cook; Christos Davatzikos; Adrien Depeursinge; Marie-Charlotte Desseroit; Nicola Dinapoli; Cuong Viet Dinh; Sebastian Echegaray; Issam El Naqa; Andriy Y Fedorov; Roberto Gatta; Robert J Gillies; Vicky Goh; Michael Götz; Matthias Guckenberger; Sung Min Ha; Mathieu Hatt; Fabian Isensee; Philippe Lambin; Stefan Leger; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Jacopo Lenkowicz; Fiona Lippert; Are Losnegård; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Olivier Morin; Henning Müller; Sandy Napel; Christophe Nioche; Fanny Orlhac; Sarthak Pati; Elisabeth A G Pfaehler; Arman Rahmim; Arvind U K Rao; Jonas Scherer; Muhammad Musib Siddique; Nanna M Sijtsema; Jairo Socarras Fernandez; Emiliano Spezi; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Stephanie Tanadini-Lang; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost; Taman Upadhaya; Vincenzo Valentini; Lisanne V van Dijk; Joost van Griethuysen; Floris H P van Velden; Philip Whybra; Christian Richter; Steffen Löck Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 29.146