Swarup S Swaminathan1, Matthew G Field1,2, David Sant3, Gaofeng Wang1,3, Anat Galor1,4, Sander R Dubovy1,5, J William Harbour1,2, Carol L Karp1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 2. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 3. John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Miami Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Miami, Florida 5. Florida Lions Ocular Pathology Laboratory, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
Abstract
Importance: Conjunctival melanoma (CM) is a highly aggressive ocular cancer for which treatment options are limited; the molecular pathogenesis is poorly understood. Objective: To identify the molecular characteristics of CM using next-generation whole-exome sequencing (WES). Design, Setting, and Participants: Whole-exome sequencing was performed on tumor DNA extracted from the archived specimens of 5 patients with CM who had been treated with surgical excision between 2006 and 2011. These samples were analyzed at a tertiary academic ocular oncology referral center using a customized bioinformatic pipeline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sample analyses were designed to detect driver mutations, chromosome copy number aberrations, and mutation signatures. Results: The study’s 5 patients ranged in age from 51 to 77 years. Four of the 5 were female, and all were white. Mutations were detected in known oncogenes, including BRAF, NRAS, NF1, EGFR, ALK, TERT, and APC. None of the mutations associated with uveal melanoma were found. All samples demonstrated a C→T mutation signature typical of UV-induced DNA damage. The most common CNA was a gain in chromosome 6p. Conclusions and Relevance: In these 5 patients, WES allowed identification of mutations that can be targeted with therapy and supported the role of UV light in CM pathogenesis. These findings indicate a need for larger studies to evaluate the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic value of WES for CM.
Importance: Conjunctival melanoma (CM) is a highly aggressive ocular cancer for which treatment options are limited; the molecular pathogenesis is poorly understood. Objective: To identify the molecular characteristics of CM using next-generation whole-exome sequencing (WES). Design, Setting, and Participants: Whole-exome sequencing was performed on tumor DNA extracted from the archived specimens of 5 patients with CM who had been treated with surgical excision between 2006 and 2011. These samples were analyzed at a tertiary academic ocular oncology referral center using a customized bioinformatic pipeline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sample analyses were designed to detect driver mutations, chromosome copy number aberrations, and mutation signatures. Results: The study’s 5 patients ranged in age from 51 to 77 years. Four of the 5 were female, and all were white. Mutations were detected in known oncogenes, including BRAF, NRAS, NF1, EGFR, ALK, TERT, and APC. None of the mutations associated with uveal melanoma were found. All samples demonstrated a C→T mutation signature typical of UV-induced DNA damage. The most common CNA was a gain in chromosome 6p. Conclusions and Relevance: In these 5 patients, WES allowed identification of mutations that can be targeted with therapy and supported the role of UV light in CM pathogenesis. These findings indicate a need for larger studies to evaluate the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic value of WES for CM.
Authors: Anna E Koopmans; Kimberley Ober; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Dion Paridaens; Nicole C Naus; Stephan Belunek; Bart Krist; Edward Post; Ellen C Zwarthoff; Annelies de Klein; Robert M Verdijk Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-08-26 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Alexander Drilon; Salvatore Siena; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Manish Patel; Myung Ju Ahn; Jeeyun Lee; Todd M Bauer; Anna F Farago; Jennifer J Wheler; Stephen V Liu; Robert Doebele; Laura Giannetta; Giulio Cerea; Giovanna Marrapese; Michele Schirru; Alessio Amatu; Katia Bencardino; Laura Palmeri; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Angelo Vanzulli; Sara Cresta; Silvia Damian; Matteo Duca; Elena Ardini; Gang Li; Jason Christiansen; Karey Kowalski; Ann D Johnson; Rupal Patel; David Luo; Edna Chow-Maneval; Zachary Hornby; Pratik S Multani; Alice T Shaw; Filippo G De Braud Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: J William Harbour; Michael D Onken; Elisha D O Roberson; Shenghui Duan; Li Cao; Lori A Worley; M Laurin Council; Katie A Matatall; Cynthia Helms; Anne M Bowcock Journal: Science Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Simon J Furney; Samra Turajlic; Gordon Stamp; Mahrokh Nohadani; Anna Carlisle; J Meirion Thomas; Andrew Hayes; Dirk Strauss; Martin Gore; Joost van den Oord; James Larkin; Richard Marais Journal: J Pathol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Christina L Decatur; Erin Ong; Nisha Garg; Hima Anbunathan; Anne M Bowcock; Matthew G Field; J William Harbour Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Klaus G Griewank; Henrike Westekemper; Rajmohan Murali; Monika Mach; Bastian Schilling; Thomas Wiesner; Tobias Schimming; Elisabeth Livingstone; Antje Sucker; Florian Grabellus; Claudia Metz; Daniela Süsskind; Uwe Hillen; Michael R Speicher; Scott E Woodman; Klaus-Peter Steuhl; Dirk Schadendorf Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lauge H Mikkelsen; Ann-Cathrine Larsen; Christian von Buchwald; Krzysztof T Drzewiecki; Jan U Prause; Steffen Heegaard Journal: APMIS Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Nihal Kenawy; Helen Kalirai; Joseph J Sacco; Sarah L Lake; Steffen Heegaard; Ann-Cathrine Larsen; Paul T Finger; Tatyana Milman; Kimberly Chin; Carlo Mosci; Francesco Lanza; Alexandre Moulin; Caroline A Schmitt; Jean Pierre Caujolle; Célia Maschi; Marina Marinkovic; Azzam F Taktak; Heinrich Heimann; Bertil E Damato; Sarah E Coupland Journal: Pigment Cell Melanoma Res Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 4.693
Authors: Katarina Cisarova; Marc Folcher; Ikram El Zaoui; Rosanna Pescini-Gobert; Virginie G Peter; Beryl Royer-Bertrand; Leonidas Zografos; Ann Schalenbourg; Michael Nicolas; Donata Rimoldi; Serge Leyvraz; Nicolò Riggi; Alexandre P Moulin; Carlo Rivolta Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 5.917