Literature DB >> 29120977

Use of A-scan Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography to Differentiate Papilledema From Pseudopapilledema.

Roberto Saenz1, Han Cheng, Thomas C Prager2, Laura J Frishman1, Rosa A Tang1.   

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE: Differentiating papilledema from pseudopapilledema reflecting tilted/crowded optic discs or disc drusen is critical but can be challenging. Our study suggests that spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and retrobulbar optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measured by A-scan ultrasound provide useful information when differentiating the two conditions.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of A-scan ultrasound and spectral-domain OCT retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) in differentiating papilledema associated with idiopathic intracranial hypertension from pseudopapilledema.
METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis included 23 papilledema and 28 pseudopapilledema patients. Ultrasound-measured ONSD at primary gaze, percent change in ONSD at lateral gaze (30° test), and peripapillary RNFLT were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed using one eye from each subject.
RESULTS: Compared with pseudopapilledema, papilledema eyes showed larger mean ONSD (5.4 ± 0.6 vs. 4.0 ± 0.3 mm, P < .0001), greater change of ONSD at lateral gaze (22.4 ± 8.4% vs. 2.8 ± 4.8%, P < .0001), and thicker retinal nerve fiber layer (219.1 ± 104.6 vs. 102.4 ± 20.1 μm, P < .0001). Optic nerve sheath diameter and 30° test had the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.98 and 0.97, respectively; followed by inferior quadrant (0.90) and average RNFLT (0.87). All papilledema eyes with Frisén scale greater than grade II were accurately diagnosed by ONSD, 30° test, or OCT. In mild papilledema (Frisén scale grades I and II, n = 15), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve remained high for ONSD (0.95) and 30° test (0.93) but decreased to 0.61 to 0.71 for RNFLT. At 95% specificity, sensitivities for ONSD, 30° test, and RNFLT were 91.3%, 91.3%, and 56.5%, respectively, for the entire papilledema group and 80.0%, 86.7%, and 13.3% for the mild papilledema subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness can potentially be used to detect moderate to severe papilledema. A-scan may further assist differentiation of mild papilledema from pseudopapilledema.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29120977      PMCID: PMC5726530          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  37 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis of optic disc edema in raised intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Sohan Singh Hayreh
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Optical coherence tomography of the retinal nerve fibre layer in mild papilloedema and pseudopapilloedema.

Authors:  E Z Karam; T R Hedges
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julie Dubourg; Etienne Javouhey; Thomas Geeraerts; Mahmoud Messerer; Behrouz Kassai
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The role of orbital ultrasonography in distinguishing papilledema from pseudopapilledema.

Authors:  S B Carter; M Pistilli; K G Livingston; D R Gold; N J Volpe; K S Shindler; G T Liu; M A Tamhankar
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Optic nerve sheath decompression. Review of 17 cases.

Authors:  S L Hupp; J S Glaser; S Frazier-Byrne
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-03

6.  Accuracy of funduscopy to identify true edema versus pseudoedema of the optic disc.

Authors:  Arturo Carta; Stefania Favilla; Marco Prato; Stefania Bianchi-Marzoli; Alfredo A Sadun; Paolo Mora
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Optical coherence tomography in papilledema: what am I missing?

Authors:  Randy Kardon
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Standardized A-scan echography in optic nerve disease.

Authors:  M S Gans; S F Byrne; J S Glaser
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-09

9.  Revised diagnostic criteria for the pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children.

Authors:  Deborah I Friedman; Grant T Liu; Kathleen B Digre
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Differentiating optic disc edema from optic nerve head drusen on optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Lenworth N Johnson; Meredith L Diehl; Chuck W Hamm; Drew N Sommerville; Gregory F Petroski
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT.

Authors:  Nicola Rosa; Maddalena De Bernardo; Giulia Abbinante; Gianluca Vecchio; Ferdinando Cione; Luigi Capasso
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Ultrasound Detection of Intracranial Hypertension in Brain Injuries.

Authors:  Livio Vitiello; Giulio Salerno; Maddalena De Bernardo; Olga D'Aniello; Luigi Capasso; Giuseppe Marotta; Nicola Rosa
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Accuracy of machine learning for differentiation between optic neuropathies and pseudopapilledema.

Authors:  Jin Mo Ahn; Sangsoo Kim; Kwang-Sung Ahn; Sung-Hoon Cho; Ungsoo S Kim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.209

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.