Literature DB >> 29119728

A framework for designing patient-specific bioprosthetic heart valves using immersogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis.

Fei Xu1, Simone Morganti2, Rana Zakerzadeh3, David Kamensky4, Ferdinando Auricchio5, Alessandro Reali5, Thomas J R Hughes3, Michael S Sacks3, Ming-Chen Hsu1.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have suggested that medical image derived computational mechanics models could be developed to reduce mortality and morbidity due to cardiovascular diseases by allowing for patient-specific surgical planning and customized medical device design. In this work, we present a novel framework for designing prosthetic heart valves using a parametric design platform and immersogeometric fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis. We parameterize the leaflet geometry using several key design parameters. This allows for generating various perturbations of the leaflet design for the patient-specific aortic root reconstructed from the medical image data. Each design is analyzed using our hybrid arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian/immersogeometric FSI methodology, which allows us to efficiently simulate the coupling of the deforming aortic root, the parametrically designed prosthetic valves, and the surrounding blood flow under physiological conditions. A parametric study is performed to investigate the influence of the geometry on heart valve performance, indicated by the effective orifice area and the coaptation area. Finally, the FSI simulation result of a design that balances effective orifice area and coaptation area reasonably well is compared with patient-specific phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging data to demonstrate the qualitative similarity of the flow patterns in the ascending aorta.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioprosthetic heart valves; fluid-structure interaction; immersogeometric analysis; isogeometric analysis; parametric design; patient specific

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29119728      PMCID: PMC5893448          DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2040-7939            Impact factor:   2.747


  60 in total

1.  A fluid-structure interaction model of the aortic valve with coaptation and compliant aortic root.

Authors:  Gil Marom; Rami Haj-Ali; Ehud Raanani; Hans-Joachim Schäfers; Moshe Rosenfeld
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Geometric modeling of functional trileaflet aortic valves: development and clinical applications.

Authors:  Michel R Labrosse; Carsten J Beller; Francis Robicsek; Mano J Thubrikar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Stress variations in the human aortic root and valve: the role of anatomic asymmetry.

Authors:  K J Grande; R P Cochran; P G Reinhall; K S Kunzelman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs.

Authors:  Sean V Murphy; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  The rate of change of left ventricular volume in man. I. Validation and peak systolic ejection rate in health and disease.

Authors:  K E Hammermeister; R C Brooks; J R Warbasse
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: application to bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  David Kamensky; Ming-Chen Hsu; Dominik Schillinger; John A Evans; Ankush Aggarwal; Yuri Bazilevs; Michael S Sacks; Thomas J R Hughes
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 6.756

7.  Determinants and normal values of ascending aortic diameter by age, gender, and race/ethnicity in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Evrim B Turkbey; Aditya Jain; Craig Johnson; Alban Redheuil; Andrew E Arai; Antoinette S Gomes; James Carr; W Gregory Hundley; Gisela Teixido-Tura; John Eng; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Biomechanical Behavior of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Heterograft Tissues: Characterization, Simulation, and Performance.

Authors:  Joao S Soares; Kristen R Feaver; Will Zhang; David Kamensky; Ankush Aggarwal; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.495

Review 9.  Endovascular device design in the future: transformation from trial and error to computational design.

Authors:  Christopher K Zarins; Charles A Taylor
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.487

10.  Rapid B-rep model preprocessing for immersogeometric analysis using analytic surfaces.

Authors:  Chenglong Wang; Fei Xu; Ming-Chen Hsu; Adarsh Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Comput Aided Geom Des       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 1.382

View more
  15 in total

1.  An anisotropic constitutive model for immersogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Michael C H Wu; Rana Zakerzadeh; David Kamensky; Josef Kiendl; Michael S Sacks; Ming-Chen Hsu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Next-generation tissue-engineered heart valves with repair, remodelling and regeneration capacity.

Authors:  Emanuela S Fioretta; Sarah E Motta; Valentina Lintas; Sandra Loerakker; Kevin K Parker; Frank P T Baaijens; Volkmar Falk; Simon P Hoerstrup; Maximilian Y Emmert
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Patient-Specific Quantification of Normal and Bicuspid Aortic Valve Leaflet Deformations from Clinically Derived Images.

Authors:  Bruno V Rego; Alison M Pouch; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  Mechanical considerations for polymeric heart valve development: Biomechanics, materials, design and manufacturing.

Authors:  Richard L Li; Jonathan Russ; Costas Paschalides; Giovanni Ferrari; Haim Waisman; Jeffrey W Kysar; David Kalfa
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Immersed Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction.

Authors:  Boyce E Griffith; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  Annu Rev Fluid Mech       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 18.511

6.  Computational investigation of left ventricular hemodynamics following bioprosthetic aortic and mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Fei Xu; Emily L Johnson; Chenglong Wang; Arian Jafari; Cheng-Hau Yang; Michael S Sacks; Adarsh Krishnamurthy; Ming-Chen Hsu
Journal:  Mech Res Commun       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.254

7.  Parameterization, geometric modeling, and isogeometric analysis of tricuspid valves.

Authors:  Emily L Johnson; Devin W Laurence; Fei Xu; Caroline E Crisp; Arshid Mir; Harold M Burkhart; Chung-Hao Lee; Ming-Chen Hsu
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.588

8.  Thinner biological tissues induce leaflet flutter in aortic heart valve replacements.

Authors:  Emily L Johnson; Michael C H Wu; Fei Xu; Nelson M Wiese; Manoj R Rajanna; Austin J Herrema; Baskar Ganapathysubramanian; Thomas J R Hughes; Michael S Sacks; Ming-Chen Hsu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Morphogeometric analysis for characterization of keratoconus considering the spatial localization and projection of apex and minimum corneal thickness point.

Authors:  Jose S Velázquez; Francisco Cavas; David P Piñero; Francisco J F Cañavate; Jorge Alio Del Barrio; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 10.479

10.  On the shape and structure of the murine pulmonary heart valve.

Authors:  Yifei Liu; Xinzeng Feng; Hao Liu; David W McComb; Christopher K Breuer; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.