Literature DB >> 29119650

Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence in a Y3 N@C80 Endohedral Fullerene: Time-Resolved Luminescence and EPR Studies.

Michal Zalibera1,2, Denis S Krylov3, Dimitrios Karagiannis3,4, Paul-Anton Will4, Frank Ziegs3, Sandra Schiemenz3, Wolfgang Lubitz1, Sebastian Reineke4, Anton Savitsky1, Alexey A Popov3.   

Abstract

The endohedral fullerene Y3 N@C80 exhibits luminescence with reasonable quantum yield and extraordinary long lifetime. By variable-temperature steady-state and time-resolved luminescence spectroscopy, it is demonstrated that above 60 K the Y3 N@C80 exhibits thermally activated delayed fluorescence with maximum emission at 120 K and a negligible prompt fluorescence. Below 60 K, a phosphorescence with a lifetime of 192±1 ms is observed. Spin distribution and dynamics in the triplet excited state is investigated with X- and W-band EPR and ENDOR spectroscopies and DFT computations. Finally, electroluminescence of the Y3 N@C80 /PFO film is demonstrated opening the possibility for red-emitting fullerene-based organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs).
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EPR/ENDOR; OLEDs; delayed fluorescence; endohedral fullerenes; luminescence

Year:  2017        PMID: 29119650      PMCID: PMC5751888          DOI: 10.1002/anie.201710637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl        ISSN: 1433-7851            Impact factor:   15.336


Fullerenes usually exhibit low quantum yields (QY) of fluorescence (in the range of 10−4) owing to the slow radiative decay and a fast and efficient inter‐system crossing (ISC), leading to an almost quantitative formation of triplet states with slow non‐radiative decay. Exohedral chemical derivatization can substantially modify the π‐system of fullerenes and produce highly luminescent multi‐adducts.1 Another way to enhance the quantum yield of luminescence of fullerenes is based on the thermal repopulation of the S1 state, via the T1 state, if the S1–T1 gap is sufficiently small. This process is known as thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) and has been found to increase the fluorescence quantum yield of C70 up to 0.08 at high temperatures.2 TADF is currently an extensively examined phenomenon in the field of organic light‐emitting diodes (OLEDs) as it allows to harvest up to 100 % of electrically formed excitons.3 With the exception of several Er‐ and Tm‐based endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs),4 with metal‐based emission, EMFs are also non‐luminescent.5 The internal heavy‐atom effect leads to even faster ISC in EMFs than in empty fullerenes. The lifetime of the S1 state in Sc3N@C80 is only 48 ps.6 Surprisingly, Y3N@C80 exhibits luminescence with reasonable quantum yield of ca 1 % or even 8 % in a cycloadduct,7 and an unusually long luminescence lifetime of 200–800 ns at room temperature. Herein, we explore the photoemission mechanism of Y3N@C80 with variable‐temperature time‐resolved luminescence spectroscopy and EPR spectroscopy. The former reveals the evolution of the emission spectra and lifetimes with temperature, whereas the latter provides information on relaxation dynamics and spin density distribution in the triplet state of Y3N@C80. We show that efficient photoemission of Y3N@C80 is caused by the small S1–T1 gap leading to TADF above 60 K. In a blend with polyfluorene (PFO), Y3N@C80 exhibits electroluminescence, which suggests that after suitable optimization and boost of the QY, Y3N@C80 may be used for red or NIR‐emitting OLEDs. In deoxygenated toluene solution, Y3N@C80 exhibits luminescence with a QY of 1.7 % and lifetime of 0.95 μs at 296 K. Saturation with air leads to a threefold reduction of the QY and appearance of singlet oxygen emission at 1270 nm. In iodobenzene, which dramatically reduces the fluorescence QY of fullerenes due to the external heavy‐atom effect, only a small decrease of the QY of Y3N@C80 was found. The very long luminescence lifetime, dependence of the QY on oxygen, and negligible effect of the heavy atom all indicate that emission of Y3N@C80 is not a standard fluorescence. Luminescence was then measured in toluene solution or in a polystyrene film at different temperatures down to 10 K. Cooling the sample from 296 K to 120 K increased the integral emission intensity (that is, the luminescence QY) more than 20‐fold, but did not change the shape of the spectrum, comprising the main band at 701 nm and lower‐energy vibronic bands (Figure 1 a). With further cooling, a drop of the emission intensity at 701 nm was observed, and the band disappeared below 60 K (Figure 1 b). At the same time, the band at 739 nm increased and became the main emission signal at low temperatures. The spectral pattern observed at 60 K remained unaltered down to 10 K (Figure 1 c). The luminescence lifetime of Y3N@C80 dispersed in a polystyrene is gradually increasing with cooling from 1.08 μs at 296 K, to 1.05 ms at 140 K, and further to ca 192 ms below 60 K (Figure 1 d). A dramatic increase of the lifetime between 120 and 60 K as well as the saturation behaviour at lower temperatures parallels the changes in the emission spectra at these temperatures.
Figure 1

a),b) Luminescence spectra of Y3N@C80 in polystyrene film measured at 10 K steps during cooling from a) 290 K to 120 K, and b) from 120 K to 20 K; excitation at λ=405 nm. The inset in (a) shows molecular structure of Y3N@C80; the inset in (b) shows a photograph of the red‐emitting film at 120 K (bright spot in the centre is due to the laser). c) Temperature profiles of the relative integral emission intensity (black dots) and relative peak intensities at 701 and 739 nm (dashed lines); the values are referred to 290 K, ranges with different emission mechanisms are marked (P=phosphorescence, TADF=thermally activated delayed fluorescence); d) luminescence lifetimes of Y3N@C80 in polystyrene at different temperatures (the inset shows the same on a logarithmic scale); blue line is a fit to Equation (1).

a),b) Luminescence spectra of Y3N@C80 in polystyrene film measured at 10 K steps during cooling from a) 290 K to 120 K, and b) from 120 K to 20 K; excitation at λ=405 nm. The inset in (a) shows molecular structure of Y3N@C80; the inset in (b) shows a photograph of the red‐emitting film at 120 K (bright spot in the centre is due to the laser). c) Temperature profiles of the relative integral emission intensity (black dots) and relative peak intensities at 701 and 739 nm (dashed lines); the values are referred to 290 K, ranges with different emission mechanisms are marked (P=phosphorescence, TADF=thermally activated delayed fluorescence); d) luminescence lifetimes of Y3N@C80 in polystyrene at different temperatures (the inset shows the same on a logarithmic scale); blue line is a fit to Equation (1). The low‐temperature emission with the 192 ms lifetime is ascribed to a phosphorescence (further corroborated by EPR as discussed below). The thermally populated emission state above 60 K is then assigned to the first excited singlet state S1. Transient absorption studies for Y3N@C80 have not been reported, but very fast ISC may be expected based on the 48 ps lifetime of the S1 state in Sc3N@C80.6 With such a short S1 lifetime, it is questionable whether the prompt fluorescence of EMFs can be observed. The almost complete quenching of the fluorescence below 60 K, when thermal T1→S1 excitation vanishes, agrees with this reasoning and shows that prompt fluorescence of Y3N@C80 is negligible. Thus, the luminescence of Y3N@C80 above 120 K is predominantly a thermally activated delayed fluorescence, TADF. Both TADF and phosphorescence can be detected in the intermediate regime (60–120 K), whereas only phosphorescence remains below 60 K (Figure 1 c). The S1–T1 energy gap, ΔE ST=0.09 eV, is determined directly from the emission spectra as the energy difference between the peaks at 701 and 739 nm. Alternatively, the ΔE ST gap can be estimated by fitting the temperature dependence of the luminescence lifetimes with Equation (1) (Figure 1 d):8 which gives ΔE ST=0.08±0.01 eV, intrinsic phosphorescence lifetime =192±1 ms, and =1.7±1.3 μs. TADF has been described for empty fullerenes, and is particularly well studied for C70.2, 9 In comparison to Y3N@C80, empty fullerenes have much higher ΔE ST values (0.25–0.30 eV), which result in higher temperatures, at which TADF is efficient (for example, above 250 K in C70). To understand the origin of the small ΔE ST gap in Y3N@C80, we performed DFT calculations.10 In the lowest energy configuration of Y3N@C80, Y atoms coordinate cage hexagons in η6‐manner (Figure 2). The HOMO of the molecule is localized on the poles, whereas the LUMO has the largest contributions near the Y‐coordinated hexagons. Time‐dependent DFT calculations show that S0→S1 excitation is predominantly the HOMO–LUMO transition and can be described as the intramolecular electron transfer from the poles to the equator (see the difference electron density in Figure 2 c). The spatial separation of the “donor” and “acceptor” parts causes the low S1–T1 gap (0.079 eV at the TD‐PBE/TZ2P level). Importantly, Y3N cluster has a negligible contribution to the S0→S1 excitation. Likewise, the spin density in the T1 triplet state is localized on the carbon cage with very small spin populations on Y and N (Figure 2 d).
Figure 2

a) HOMO and b) LUMO of Y3N@C80 with C 3‐configuraton (plane of the cluster and C 3 axis are normal and parallel to the paper plane, respectively); c) TD‐DFT computed difference electron density for the S0→S1 excitation (purple “+”/blue “−”); d) Spin density distribution in the T1 triplet state of Y3N@C80. Carbon atoms are grey except for metal‐coordinated hexagons shown in orange, Y green, N blue.

a) HOMO and b) LUMO of Y3N@C80 with C 3‐configuraton (plane of the cluster and C 3 axis are normal and parallel to the paper plane, respectively); c) TD‐DFT computed difference electron density for the S0→S1 excitation (purple “+”/blue “−”); d) Spin density distribution in the T1 triplet state of Y3N@C80. Carbon atoms are grey except for metal‐coordinated hexagons shown in orange, Y green, N blue. Y3N@C80 was further studied by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. The long triplet lifetime enables the use of light‐induced EPR to study the spin density distribution and relaxation dynamics of the triplet 3Y3N@C80*. Under continuous laser illumination below 120 K in frozen toluene or polystyrene film, a continuous wave (CW) EPR signal of the 3Y3N@C80* triplet is measured (Supporting Information, Figure S1), which also features a half‐field signal at helium temperatures (Supporting Information, Figure S1). A further characterization of 3Y3N@C80* was achieved in a multifrequency pulsed EPR study. Figure 3 shows the time‐resolved electron spin echo detected EPR (TR‐ESE‐EPR) spectra of the Y3N@C80 triplet at X‐ and W‐band microwave frequencies. Shortly after the laser flash (Figure 3 a,d) the spectra exhibit polarized character owing to the non‐equilibrium population of the triplet energy levels generated during the intersystem crossing from the S1 state.11 The polarization pattern is described as EE/AA at both microwave frequencies (emission/absorption). The polarization pattern is opposite to that observed for the empty fullerene excited triplets 3C60*, 3C70* (AA/EE).12 The equilibrium population of the triplet energy levels is accomplished via spin lattice relaxation approximately 500 μs after the laser flash at 20 K (Figure 3 g, T 1 of 74 μs and 91 μs at X‐ and W‐band, respectively). EPR spectra recorded with longer delay after flash (t DAF) correspond to the Boltzmann population at the corresponding temperature (Figure 3 b,e), and are reproduced in a simulation with a rhombic g tensor (g=2.0004, g=2.0008, g=2.0030) and an axially symmetric zero field splitting tensor (ZFS, D=+128 MHz, E=0). The positive sign of D is determined by utilizing the enhanced thermal spin polarization in W‐band EPR (Supporting Information, Figures S2, S3). The g tensor of 3Y3N@C80* is more asymmetric and the ZFS is smaller than in the case of the empty fullerene 3C60* (D/E=−340/+15 MHz),12a 3C70* (D/E=+153/+5–42 MHz)12b,12c and monometallo endohedral fullerenes 3Sr@C74* (|D|/|E|=260/35 MHz), 3Ba@C74* (|D|/|E|=250/47 MHz),13 and non‐metal endofullerene 3H2@C60* (D/E≈−340/+15 MHz).14 The small ZFS in 3Y3N@C80* points to a negligible impact of the spin orbit coupling and is thus in line with the dominant spin density distribution on the carbon cage (Figure 2 d). It also reflects the larger size of the cage and thus formally larger spin‐spin distance between the unpaired electrons.
Figure 3

a)–c) X‐band and d)–f) W‐band ESE detected EPR spectra of the Y3N@C80 excited triplet (3Y3N@C80*) in frozen [D8]toluene solution at 20 K: a),d) with delay after the 488 nm laser pulse t DAF=500 ns, b),e) t DAF=15 ms, and c),f) continuous 510 nm laser illumination. Red lines represent EPR spectra calculated using the spin Hamiltonian parameters discussed in the text. g),h) ESE intensity of the emissive polarized signal of the 3Y3N@C80* at X‐ and W‐band at 20 K as a function of t DAF (arrows in (a) and (d) mark the field position of time recordings). The polarization of the signal decays with the spin lattice relaxation time T 1 (g) followed by the decay of the Boltzmann‐population signal according to the triplet lifetime (h). values differ in protonated (180 ms) and deuterated (240 ms) toluene matrix.

a)–c) X‐band and d)–f) W‐band ESE detected EPR spectra of the Y3N@C80 excited triplet (3Y3N@C80*) in frozen [D8]toluene solution at 20 K: a),d) with delay after the 488 nm laser pulse t DAF=500 ns, b),e) t DAF=15 ms, and c),f) continuous 510 nm laser illumination. Red lines represent EPR spectra calculated using the spin Hamiltonian parameters discussed in the text. g),h) ESE intensity of the emissive polarized signal of the 3Y3N@C80* at X‐ and W‐band at 20 K as a function of t DAF (arrows in (a) and (d) mark the field position of time recordings). The polarization of the signal decays with the spin lattice relaxation time T 1 (g) followed by the decay of the Boltzmann‐population signal according to the triplet lifetime (h). values differ in protonated (180 ms) and deuterated (240 ms) toluene matrix. TR‐ESE‐EPR shows that the 3Y3N@C80* exhibits a long lifetime depending on the deuteration level of toluene (Figure 3 h; 240 ms in [D8]toluene and 180 ms in [H8]toluene at 20 K). Thus, the values determined by TR‐ESE‐EPR are in good agreement with the lifetime obtained from the luminescence (192 ms in polystyrene). Owing to the long lifetime of the T1 at 20 K, the pulsed EPR spectra obtained under continuous irradiation (Figure 3 c,f) correspond to the signals with equilibrium population of the triplet energy levels, and can be well simulated using the spin Hamiltonian parameters derived above. The X‐band spectra (Figure 3 b,c) exhibit an additional narrow hole in the centre of the spectrum, which can be traced back to the simultaneous excitation of both allowed electron spin transitions of the triplet (T0↔T+ and T0↔T−) as described for 3C70.12c The detailed image of the spin density distribution in the T1 state is encoded in the hyperfine interactions of the electrons with the nearby nuclei, and can be extracted using hyperfine spectroscopy methods such as electron nuclear double resonance (ENDOR).15 ENDOR proved very powerful in investigations of paramagnetic endohedral fullerenes La@C82,16 N@C60,17 N@C70,18 and the triplet excited state of H2@C60.14 For light excited triplets ENDOR studies are scarce and often hampered by the short and/or short T 1 relaxation times. Here, the long of 3Y3N@C80* allowed for a detailed ENDOR investigation. W‐band ENDOR spectra recorded at different field positions corresponding to the turning points of the ZFS pattern, are shown in Figure 4. The trace in Figure 4 a shows intense sharp lines around 7 MHz, 21.9 MHz and 35.9 MHz, at the Larmor frequencies of the 89Y, 2H and 13C nuclei. These signals are characteristic for the triplet states and originate from degenerate NMR transitions within the zero level electron spin manifold m=0. The additional broader lines at frequencies below 13.0 MHz reflect the hyperfine and quadrupole couplings of the cluster nuclei, 89Y and 14N (Figure 4 c,d; Supporting Information, Figure S4). The orientation selection achieved in the W‐band ENDOR spectra reveal a predominantly isotropic character of the 89Y hyperfine interaction, with a small positive A iso(89Y) hyperfine coupling (hfc) constant of +1.02 MHz, (for details, see the Supporting Information). The three Y nuclei in the cluster are magnetically equivalent. A small positive axial hfc with A ∥(14N)=+0.62 MHz, A ⊥(14N)=+0.15 MHz (A iso(14N)= +0.46 MHz), and a somewhat larger nuclear quadrupole coupling of |e 2  Q  q/h|=1.46 MHz (asymmetry η≈0), is found for the central 14N atom. Experimental hfc values are in reasonable agreement with the results of DFT calculations in the Supporting Information.
Figure 4

a) W‐band 14N Mims‐ENDOR spectrum of 3Y3N@C80* recorded under continuous illumination (510 nm) at 20 K. The Larmor frequencies of nuclei in the system are labelled by arrows (* marks an artefact line). The spectrum was obtained at the field position marked by the blue arrow in the ESE detected EPR spectrum shown in (b). c),d) The orientation selected 89Y (c) and 14N (d) ENDOR spectra obtained at field positions marked by identically coloured arrows in (b). Grey lines show spectra calculated using the spin Hamiltonian parameters from the Supporting Information, Table S1. The splitting due to the corresponding hyperfine (A) and quadrupolar (P) interactions are indicated.

a) W‐band 14N Mims‐ENDOR spectrum of 3Y3N@C80* recorded under continuous illumination (510 nm) at 20 K. The Larmor frequencies of nuclei in the system are labelled by arrows (* marks an artefact line). The spectrum was obtained at the field position marked by the blue arrow in the ESE detected EPR spectrum shown in (b). c),d) The orientation selected 89Y (c) and 14N (d) ENDOR spectra obtained at field positions marked by identically coloured arrows in (b). Grey lines show spectra calculated using the spin Hamiltonian parameters from the Supporting Information, Table S1. The splitting due to the corresponding hyperfine (A) and quadrupolar (P) interactions are indicated. The isotropic hfc constants translate to about 0.082 % s‐spin population at each Y atom and 0.025 % s‐spin population on the nitrogen, respectively, in line with the negligible spin density delocalization on the cluster (Figure 2 d). In the family of Y‐containing EMF‐radicals a similar situation is found for Y@C82 with A iso(89Y) of 1.33 MHz (0.1 % s‐spin pop.).19 Somewhat larger metal contributions are found in the radical anion of Y3N@C80 (32 MHz) and its pyrrolidine adduct (17.5 and 2×3.8 MHz).20 A strikingly different situation is found for the unpaired electron delocalized between two Y atoms in Y2@C79N and Y2@C80(CH2C6H5) with A iso(89Y) close to 220 MHz (17.6 % s‐spin pop. for each Y).21 A iso(14N) values reported earlier for nitride clusterfullerenes are 3.7 MHz in the anion radical of Y3N@C80 and 1.4 MHz in its pyrrolidine adduct.20 TADF has recently been proposed as third generation emitter concept since it allows all triplets to be harvested radiatively and thus the internal quantum efficiency approaches 100 %. To verify the applicability of EMFs such as Y3N@C80 in TADF‐OLEDs, we prepared a simple solution‐processed device using Y3N@C80‐embedded in a polyfluorene (PFO) as an active material (Figure 5). The poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) and PFO:Y3N@C80 layers were prepared sequentially by spin‐coating onto indium tin oxide (ITO) electrodes. The device was then transferred into a vacuum chamber for Al deposition. Figure 5 shows that PFO with 10 % mass of Y3N@C80 has a new band at 708 nm owing to the electroluminescence of Y3N@C80, which is absent in the device made from pure PFO. The quantum yield of Y3N@C80 is rather low at room temperature for an efficient application, but a further increase of the QY may be achieved via derivatization,7b by changing the temperature (Figure 1), or by supramolecular assemblies.22 A co‐existence of PFO fluorescence and Y3N@C80 luminescence in Figure 5 also indicates that the energy transfer in this device is not very efficient and needs further optimization.
Figure 5

Principle of the OLED device (left) and comparison of the electroluminescence of the PFO and PFO:Y3N@C80 films (right) at room temperature.

Principle of the OLED device (left) and comparison of the electroluminescence of the PFO and PFO:Y3N@C80 films (right) at room temperature. To summarize, we have discovered that Y3N@C80 has a small S1‐T1 gap of 0.08–0.09 eV and exhibits thermally activated delayed fluorescence above 60 K, with a quantum yield increasing from about 1 % at room temperature to the maximum value of about 22 % at 120 K. Below 60 K, phosphorescence with a long lifetime of 192±1 ms is exclusively observed. The triplet state of Y3N@C80 is extensively characterized by time‐resolved EPR and ENDOR spectroscopy, providing information on the dynamics, hyperfine structure, and spin density distribution in the T1 state.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  25 in total

1.  Squeezing of nitrogen atomic orbitals in a chemical trap

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-08-14       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Efficient and accurate approximations to the molecular spin-orbit coupling operator and their use in molecular g-tensor calculations.

Authors:  Frank Neese
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Davies electron-nuclear double resonance revisited: enhanced sensitivity and nuclear spin relaxation.

Authors:  Alexei M Tyryshkin; John J L Morton; Arzhang Ardavan; S A Lyon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Thermally activated delayed fluorescence in fullerenes.

Authors:  Carlos Baleizão; Mário N Berberan-Santos
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Synthesis of C70 -Based Fluorophores through Sequential Functionalization to Form Isomerically Pure Multiadducts.

Authors:  Ning Lou; Yanbang Li; Liangbing Gan
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Highly efficient organic light-emitting diodes from delayed fluorescence.

Authors:  Hiroki Uoyama; Kenichi Goushi; Katsuyuki Shizu; Hiroko Nomura; Chihaya Adachi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Sensing and imaging of oxygen with parts per billion limits of detection and based on the quenching of the delayed fluorescence of (13)C70 fullerene in polymer hosts.

Authors:  Sven Kochmann; Carlos Baleizão; Mário N Berberan-Santos; Otto S Wolfbeis
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Metal nitride cluster fullerene M3N@C80 (M=Y, Sc) based dyads: synthesis, and electrochemical, theoretical and photophysical studies.

Authors:  Julio R Pinzón; Claudia M Cardona; Maria Angeles Herranz; Marta E Plonska-Brzezinska; Amit Palkar; Andreas J Athans; Nazario Martín; Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea; Josep M Poblet; Giovanni Bottari; Tomás Torres; S Shankara Gayathri; Dirk M Guldi; Luis Echegoyen
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.236

9.  Enhanced 1520 nm photoluminescence from Er3+ ions in di-erbium-carbide metallofullerenes (Er2C2)@C82 (isomers I, II, and III).

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ito; Toshiya Okazaki; Shingo Okubo; Masahiro Akachi; Yutaka Ohno; Takashi Mizutani; Tetsuya Nakamura; Ryo Kitaura; Toshiki Sugai; Hisanori Shinohara
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 15.881

10.  Probing the C₆₀ triplet state coupling to nuclear spins inside and out.

Authors:  Vasileia Filidou; Salvatore Mamone; Stephanie Simmons; Steven D Karlen; Harry L Anderson; Christopher W M Kay; Alessandro Bagno; Federico Rastrelli; Yasujiro Murata; Koichi Komatsu; Xuegong Lei; Yongjun Li; Nicholas J Turro; Malcolm H Levitt; John J L Morton
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  1 in total

1.  Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence in a Y3 N@C80 Endohedral Fullerene: Time-Resolved Luminescence and EPR Studies.

Authors:  Michal Zalibera; Denis S Krylov; Dimitrios Karagiannis; Paul-Anton Will; Frank Ziegs; Sandra Schiemenz; Wolfgang Lubitz; Sebastian Reineke; Anton Savitsky; Alexey A Popov
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 15.336

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.